Not necessarily. You have to remember that Litchfield's admin leaves a lot to be desired and was pretty corrupt, with a lot of "CYA" going on by the administration.
Let's suppose the local police *did* call Litchfield, asking about Morello (not likely, given they know she was supposed to be in prison, but let's say they did just to satisfy Christopher.)
Litchfield's admin, not wanting to get themselves into trouble, would have probably played it cool, just telling the police, "The inmate was on work detail at that time." Unless the police tell them outright that they have evidence linking Morello to the crime (and Litchfield admin knows enough to know the police probably *didn't* check for prints, given the details--if they had, they wouldn't have just called Litchfield, they would have come for Morello outright), Litchfield's not going to volunteer anything further--such as Morello's work detail was driving the prison van. The police go to Christopher and tell him, "We called the prison, they said she was on work detail at the time this happened. We understand your concern, but this was a random act unrelated to her."
Christopher knows better, and the audience knows better. But for lack of evidence, time, money, and manpower, the police let it go.
And I might be misremembering, but wasn't it about this time that another guard who *did* check on the van once an hour (the way they were supposed to, and didn't?) start? And wasn't this also about the time Pensatucky started driving the van? Which makes me think Litchfield was onto Morello, and again, just covered their own asses in this and pulled her off van detail to make sure it didn't happen again.
reply
share