no No NOOOOO
Are you kidding me? The first one was god awful already...please someone kill me. PLEASE! I BEG OF YOU!
Sweet Jeepers...
You will need to state your dislike in a more PROFESSIONAL and ANALYTICAL response, man. Everyone may be entitled to their own opinions, but exaggerating in an immature, ridiculous response of how you hate it is NOT valid enough.
So SHUT UP and give a more civilized reason.
Why does this piece of *beep* need a sequel? It was unoriginal, had bland characters, was not funny at all and it had a rapping cockatoo singing about poop.
It used the same *beep* plot as many many movies before it. Like Toy Story, Brother Bear, Bolt, Alpha & Omega and so on.
Two characters that dont like each other / dont get along are stranded somewhere and they have to work together to find their way home. On the journey they meet comic reliefs (in this case, the second worst I've ever seen). In the end there is a huge showdown in which on of them almost dies, but we all know there will be a happy ending and they fall in love / become friends.
Oh...but its so original because it takes place in Rio, right? Yeah...thats totally fresh. Doesnt make the movie better though.
How can anyone like this? How does this get a sequel. Please...anybody...tell me!
Sweet Jeepers...
Rio literally has no similarities to any of those movies you listed
shareNo. Of course not. Its just the same plot in a different location with different characters. What would I expect from someone who likes Alpha & Omega, which is an even worse movie
Sweet Jeepers...
I have to agree with AlphaandOmegafan. I literally don't see the similarities in those other films.
You're only right about one thing, Reineke86. There are a few similarities in Rio that were used in previous animated films and it could've been improved a little more. 'Alpha and Omega' does seem to match scenarios and that film was lackluster to the critics due to it being predictable and looking it was desparately trying to fit the mold of the more successful computer animation studios (i.e. Pixar, DreamWorks, Blue Sky).
However, it all depends on how the story plays out well in the end in terms of character development, chemistry, and such, no matter how many times it uses recycled plots that have been used countless times in other animated movies with different settings and characters.
Usually, I read/listen to top critic reviews and then go off to see the movie myself if they were right. And it usually ends with me mostly agreeing with them, a few times not.
For RIO in a critic's consensus: it has an eco-sensitive storyline with stunning colorful visuals, talented vocal cast, and a few characters that can let audiences relate to in real-life.
Wow, I can't believe you wrote a long, detailed response actually defending Rio. It was a painfully by-the-numbers animated flick with little substance. As for character development, if you can even call it that in Rio, was extremely shallow and forced; pasted on just because the movie HAD to end with Blu and Jewel getting along.
sharesequels suck! that is what i got to say and you are right the first movie was not even good to make a sequel for it and again sequels suck!
shareRiene, There are only about 10 basic plots/stories in Existence. There will always be similarities and Overlap among any movies. the simplicity in most children films eggagrate the problem as a sore throat does to my spelling errors
Oh GOOD!,my dog found the chainsaw