Was Jasmine a victim, or part of the problem? (SPOILERS)
I was talking about this movie with a couple of friends. It's been a while since I've seen it, but my recollection is that throughout the movie, an appearance (at least) is given to the audience that Jasmine is a victim. Her husband turned out to be a criminal and a fraud, as well as a philanderer. But then at the end, Jasmine says and does some things that revealed, to me, that she had known about the fraud all along, and had in fact supported it, since it was the basis of their wealth, which Jasmine was very much about.
My friends disagreed, saying that she had not known about the fraud, and that it was a total surprise to her, when it was revealed.
I guess I need to watch this again to refresh my memory, but in the meantime, can someone clarify that for me? Didn't Jasmine say or do something near the end that revealed (if you're really listening to what she's saying) she had known all along about the fraud that gave them their wealth? Or am I misremembering?
My friends said that, no, Jasmine remained a victim to the end. She had no knowledge that her wealth came from fraud.
I even have a faint recollection that her son (stepson?) was mean to her at the end, and realizing that was because he knew that she had known or participated in wrongdoing but portrayed herself to others as a victim.