MovieChat Forums > Mary Queen of Scots (2018) Discussion > Not quite as bad as I feared, although a...

Not quite as bad as I feared, although as historically inaccurate... (spoilers)


Notes:

- Saoirse Ronan did a great job. It's a shame she couldn't have been Mary in a better film and a better director

- The revisionist casting with black and Asian characters was totally superfluous. It added nothing to the film and only really hurt the suspension of disbelief. And the little flirtation with Mary's lady was utterly pointless.

- The meeting between Mary and Elizabeth was probably was the worst part, it felt the movie was dragging at that point. The way it was done with the laundry sheets and no guards or courtiers was absurd.

- David Rizzio was rumored to be a homosexual, but since he was hated, its not surprising. That's the way it went. Every sovereign and every courtier had gossip spread about them. It certainly wasn't done openly like that with Mary and her ladies.

- I was pleasantly surprised at how her relationship with Bothwell was handled. I feared another revisionist love story between them at first, but they didn't go that route and did a better job with it than other films about Mary have.

reply

I stopped watching after seeing the multiracial cast of lords and maids.


This is ridiculous and pathetic. Social Justice Warriors are ruining everything. I guess this is the end of historical movies in the west.

reply

Alarm bells started sounding when Mary first spoke. She grew up in France, had just arrived in Scotland yet already spoke with a Scottish accent? No.

reply

Thought it was watchable, but it was almost 50/50 split between Mary & Liz.
It jumps straight to her return from France and she speaks like she has been in Glasgow the past 10 years.
Nothing about her upbringing, nor anything about her time in the Tower.
Too much Liz, not enough Mary.
But I did enjoy it.

reply