Another movie built up on hype by those who want to feel somewhat special by praising a film made somewhere unique like Iran by...wait for it..a woman! There's absolutely nothing here that is unique or fresh or has some specific artistic perspective that could be gained from the viewing. What we do get is a Persian fantasy of a mashup of Americana. Why? It's In Persia for goodness sakes??! Take advantage of that!!!
This director could have given us a fresh perspective and cultural insight into this interesting land but instead regurgitated all too familiar western tv shows and movies.(and Making something black & white is not bold just made for pretty photography. And even that aesthetic choice has nothing to do with its context. So I can only guess the main train why this director chose black and white).
There also seems to be a bit of a "hey, in Persia we're just like you we eat hamburgers, we like Madonna, we take crack, we listen to emo and raves and love Eurocentrism! Isn't this great ?! And Isn't this film appealing because of this?" The very things that are specifically Persian is nothing to avoid and wouldve been far more powerful conceptually, narratively and otherwise.
It was filmed in California, by an English-born director of Persian descent. Vice Reader types (it was published by Vice for god's sake) and everyone within range of their hype beat are excited to see that, yes, wow, who'd have imagined, Iranians too can reflect their washed out boring lifestyles on film. Actual Iranian do films exist, search them out if you're interested, but this film was selected for hype specifically because it is a pseudo-Iranian film that elevates the worldview its audience wants to see represented.
I so agree with you!!! I had just learned that it wasn't filmed in Iran which takes this whole movie into a whole other strange hybrid of Western colonial pop art mashup. Even though the director is painfully enamored with North America and the west, she still could've bridged some new insight into, say, European / Iranian identity. What we get is a young ladys' rendition of: 1. James Dean via rebel w/out a cause.. 2. David Lynch (for a dose of experimental and "INDIE CRED") 3. F.W. Murnau - nosferatu 4. indirect john hughes movies 5. and of course tarantino and American pulp 6. et. al...... put into a blender with black and white photography. "A Girl Walks Home ...." is simply San Fernando Valley teenage vampire flick dressed up in a burka.
There definitely are true Iranian film directors via Abbas Kiarostami. And @gargarie you are so right that this film merely elevates the worldview its audience wants desperately to see represented.
And at the end of the day this all doesn't mean much if it wasn't for the fact that Iran has much to add and say as anyone to world cinema and that this Eurocentrism in hollywood that this director blindly has been brainwashed into is at its all time high.
1. James Dean via rebel w/out a cause.. 2. David Lynch (for a dose of experimental and "INDIE CRED") 3. F.W. Murnau - nosferatu 4. indirect john hughes movies 5. and of course tarantino and American pulp
You act as if they had invented anything. Everyone on this list, save perhaps Murnau, was inspired by someone or something else.
Why can't people dislike something now without everyone who likes it being a hipster, a troll, a fanboy or a moron?
For every lie I unlearn I learn something new - Ani Difranco
reply share
Hmm, makes kinda sense what your saying. Everything is inspired by something that may not have to do with films particularly (except for Tarrantino who just straight out rips off scenes from movies). But I'm not sure if I understand if you like this film or not. I did not. In this current simulacrum of comic book, super hero, vampire, premature adolescent, pop retread, people will rush to anything that seems to be packaged "differently" or "indie" (in this case: Iranian Vampires!! In black and white?! from a Girls perspective!? It's got to be feminism!! Wow!!) And contemporary online critics are even worse about this!
1. Of course the director couldve given you a cultural perspective of Iran. But does she have to? And does every foreign director work for the pleasure of Westeners, not to make art, but to make "cultural insights?"
I mean I get what you mean, Iran is a beautiful country and I guess when you watch Iranian movies you wanna get an Iranian feel/insights but its silly to asume that foreign directors (I dont even think she IS foreign?) are only supposed to make movies with their heritage in mind. They just wanna make fun movies!
2. Not sure if youve ever been to Iran, but behind the curtain of western-hate there is alot of (especially under young people, underground parties etc) "eurocentrism" as you call it, I'd just call it Globalism though since they retain alot of their own culture aswell and mix it in a beautiful way, imo.
Great questions Bagrawr: My response to your 2 points:
1) First, Many of the great foreign directors definitely DO NOT work for the pleasure of Westerners nor have them in mind. And because of this, whether they try to or not, out of their work they've created an awareness for outsiders (Westerns per example) about the bigger world out there. Because of this their work gives us a bigger perspective of the world and takes our minds off of a certain Western colonial mindset i.e. Western measurements of beauty and Western measurements of moral agency (to name a few). And so yes, because of this, they've given us cultural insight.
Example, director Niri Bilge Ceylan:: Are you familiar with him? He's Turkish. He has made it plain and clear several times that he's not interested in journeying to Hollywood nor in making some Western film to appeal to Eurocentric, culturally impotent tastes.
This director, Anna Amirpour so far, is completely unoriginal. Just a "regurgitator" of Western pop culture pastiche. But of course, there's a high chance that if someone - such as herself, syncs "cool images" in the right way with hip, "indie" music and then throws in something a little surreal (to seem artistic) you may have a audience hit. Which she's done.
2) Second: She's from the West and not a foreigner (from the East) Some interviews has revealed she's lived a privilege life across the pond in Great Britain. The major problem with this mess of a film, other than it's hipster unoriginality, is that it was publicized by her marketing team as an Iranian vampire spaghetti western. Theres a vampire in it. There's American cowboy nonsense in it. There's a burka in it. Yet, this isn't Iranian at all!
Damn! I didn't have this reaction at all while watching it. I mean I guess I see where you're coming from. It's very stylized and it borrows from Tarantino, etc. But I thought it was really well crafted and there were some great scenes in it.
Are there some Iranian or foreign directors you could recommend that are better than her? I Loved 'Only lovers left alive' too... Actually I can't help but wonder if she heavily borrowed from that movie, cause they're very similar. But yeah I've been having trouble finding great current foreign directors. I love Joachim Trier, Joon-Ho Bong, Sion Sono... Can't seem to find many others...
Sorry, i just saw your great message. It's too bad the Abbas, the Iranian filmmaker died. I agree, there were some great scenes in this film but overall it was just a hollow movie experience for me with a bunch of cool looking scenes. I guess eurocentrism really gets to me when I see someone with an opportunity to highlight an aspect of a misunderstood culture to complete ruin it by giving up redundant, hip David Lynch rip off pastiche and Tarantino fangirl homages. I like the directors that you listed. May I suggest looking into the great Steve Mcqueen the director?