1st Season...Intentional misdirection?
MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD.
So, second two seasons aside...I like to think of the first season as a nicely arched story that stands wonderfully by itself. I loved the first season.
I have one problem with the chronology at the beginning, however.
Toward the end we find out how Christina became a werewolf and what it entailed, namely drinking water from the paw print of an existing werewolf, Peter, which she does near his trailer, as seen in the flashback.
However, at the beginning of the first episode we see the first victim killed at night. Then afterward we see Peter and his mother arriving at the trailer for the first time during the day. Are we just to take the murder as a sort of intro to the episode and not as sequential scenes, or is it a deliberate attempt to make the audience...those that were paying attention anyway...think that Christina couldn't be the werewolf?
It also bothered me a bit that the retroactively made it seem like Peter and Christina had more of a relationship than we were led to believe. We only see her come by the trailer once, and it doesn't end well. Then she's cold to him at the beginning of school...so when was this hearfelt moment in the trailer that we see in the flashback supposed to have taken place?
Do you think the writers knew who the werewolf was going to be before they got to the end of the season, or the second half at least?