Plot hole when Jimmy testifies (spoilers)
Maybe I missed something in the movie, but how can Jimmy testify in court that he "saw" a hit-and-run driver when he was still in prison when Mitch hit Ackerman? The diner scene where Mitch tells Jimmy that he his Ackerman and that Davis was in his house and asks for his help happens after the trial. What does Jimmy gain from letting Davis go if he has no idea that his brother actually committed the crime?
share