'A young girl has a one-night stand..'
.. with a random stranger"
EHM NO, a young girl gets drugged and raped by a stranger
.. with a random stranger"
EHM NO, a young girl gets drugged and raped by a stranger
Thank you! That bothered me too. There was nothing ambiguous about the rape scene, and yet none of the reviews and critiques mention rape. Neither does the marketing of the movie. All I read is that she "hooks up with a stranger" (movie critique) or "has a one-night stand" (official movie poster). Can you say rape culture?
What disturbs me even more are some of the reviews here on imdb. Here is one that was obviously written by a young male person: "...should be shown to all sexually active teenagers or in sex education class. What I got from watching this movie is you need to be careful and PREVENTION goes along way. Many times we let our guard down because of alcohol ... it will leave you squirming and wanting to cover your pecker."
This is wrong and disturbing on every conceivable level, and it horrifies me that there are people who watch this movie and don't realize that they've just witnessed a woman being roofied and raped. A lesbian woman who would never have had consensual sex with a man, and in fact begs him to stop when she wakes up in the middle of the sexual assault. (The movie should come with a trigger warning imho). How can anyone watch this scene, think of it as a perfectly normal pickup routine, and conclude that she is somehow at fault for... what? Going to a party? Having a few drinks? Not asking her rapist to wear protection before he roofied her? I'm at a loss for words here.
"...should be shown to all sexually active teenagers or in sex education class. What I got from watching this movie is you need to be careful and PREVENTION goes along way. Many times we let our guard down because of alcohol ... it will leave you squirming and wanting to cover your pecker."
I also think people should be taught precautions against rape. Its a sad fact that when at parties drinking alot of these young people have no idea what to look out for
"I also think people should be taught precautions against rape. Its a sad fact that when at parties drinking alot of these young people have no idea what to look out for"
Well, I think we should teach people to not rape instead
I HATE THIS ATTITUDE.
Obviously rape is bad and people shouldnt do it but just as obvious is that there are people who dont care and are going to do it anyway.
You are basically saying let send our daughter into a minefield without a map because the mines should be there in the first place. BOOOM! now your child is injuyed for life. Is it your "fault"? No. Could you have prevented it? YES.
Teach your children how to avoid predators. Even if that means pointing out a rape victim as a bad example.
+1
---
Web: www.jmberman.com
Well, I think we should teach people to not rape instead
Well, I think we should teach people to not rape instead
Thank you! That bothered me too. There was nothing ambiguous about the rape scene, and yet none of the reviews and critiques mention rape. Neither does the marketing of the movie. All I read is that she "hooks up with a stranger" (movie critique) or "has a one-night stand" (official movie poster). Can you say rape culture?
What disturbs me even more are some of the reviews here on imdb. Here is one that was obviously written by a young male person: "...should be shown to all sexually active teenagers or in sex education class. What I got from watching this movie is you need to be careful and PREVENTION goes along way. Many times we let our guard down because of alcohol ... it will leave you squirming and wanting to cover your pecker."
This is wrong and disturbing on every conceivable level, and it horrifies me that there are people who watch this movie and don't realize that they've just witnessed a woman being roofied and raped. A lesbian woman who would never have had consensual sex with a man, and in fact begs him to stop when she wakes up in the middle of the sexual assault. (The movie should come with a trigger warning imho). How can anyone watch this scene, think of it as a perfectly normal pickup routine, and conclude that she is somehow at fault for... what? Going to a party? Having a few drinks? Not asking her rapist to wear protection before he roofied her? I'm at a loss for words here.
TY! /\ I never saw the movie (I'll watch tonight), but I read all the comments and saw the trailer. Posters comments reflect she did not get raped and druged.
The trailer - Clearly has her awaking during the middle of "rape" and she even says, "no ...stop...please no" She's obviously been drugged and raped which adds to the overal impact of her decint into death (and possibly spoiler) being re-annimated and brought back to life "zombie" like feature.
[deleted]
Large parts of society condone prison rape. Just read the comments under any news article about some horrible crime, there's always a bunch of people expressing their hope that the alleged perpetrator is going to get raped in jail. Others argue that marital rape is not really rape at all, which is a frighteningly widespread opinion in religious circles.
Nearly all conservatives approve of raping pregnant women with an ultrasound wand before they can legally exercise their right to an abortion. Many people condone or excuse rape if the victim was drunk at the time, wore relatively little clothing, was known for being promiscuous, invited the rapist to her home or agreed to follow him to his place, was in a relationship with the rapist, initially agreed on having sex but then changed her mind, was a sex worker, and so on.
Most news outlets downplay rape, or even make fun of rape, if the victim is male. When an adult man is raped by a woman, the crime is treated like a salacious joke. When a male student is held down by his peers and raped with an object, news authors speak of a "hazing ritual" and parents excuse this behavior with something in the lines of "boys will be boys". And when an adult woman seduces a male child, there'll be plenty of comments like "you go, kiddo" or "I wish I had been that lucky back in the day".
These are but a few examples. I didn't even mention victim blaming yet, which is probably the most widespread form of rape condonation. Bottom line: Rape culture is not only very real, it hurts men and women alike. Male victims might actually be taken less seriously and find less support than female victims. I hope for your sake that you'll never have to experience this yourself.
THANK YOU ^^^^^^^^
shareApplause.
share
Nearly all conservatives approve of raping pregnant women with an ultrasound wand before they can legally exercise their right to an abortion. Many people condone or excuse rape if the victim was drunk at the time, wore relatively little clothing, was known for being promiscuous, invited the rapist to her home or agreed to follow him to his place, was in a relationship with the rapist, initially agreed on having sex but then changed her mind, was a sex worker, and so on.
... his trend of calling anyone that disagree with you(on abortion in this case) a rapist ...
I never did that. I'm calling the act of forcing an object into a woman's vagina under duress an act of rape. And it clearly is under duress if women are forbidden to exercise their legal rights unless they endure this act of penetration. I'm further calling anyone who would approve of such a law a pro-rape advocate. You can easily avoid this stigma by not advocating or excusing rape in any form.
That's a very far-fetched comparison. Rape victims have already been violated without consent. Far too few of them are in any condition to jump through the hoops of the legal system, put up with disbelief and victim blame, and relive their ordeal by answering very personal questions in an often futile attempt to bring their rapist to justice. The few that are willing to go through this have a vested interest in helping to gather evidence against their rapist.
In short, this is a necessary step and in the best interest of the victim. A compulsory vaginal ultrasound is neither of those things. It's simply not a part of the abortion process.
That's a very far-fetched comparison. Rape victims have already been violated without consent. Far too few of them are in any condition to jump through the hoops of the legal system, put up with disbelief and victim blame, and relive their ordeal by answering very personal questions in an often futile attempt to bring their rapist to justice.
Conservatives who proposed this additional legal hurdle wanted all abortion candidates to see an ultrasound image of their ZEF prior to the abortion procedure, probably in the hopes they'd change their mind. The rape I was talking about is the unconsensual penetration with an ultrasound wand. Penetration with an object is considered rape in almost all parts of the developed world, and it is an unconsensual act in this case because it would have happened under duress (no ultrasound, no abortion).
shareNo. Rape culture is not real. Just as murder culture or theft culture is not real.
I don't know what society you live in, but rape is not seen as "ok" by any sane person.
People often proclaim that rape is not ok, and then follow it up with something like "...but it's kind of your own fault if you had a beer with yoiur friends" or "but what about the poor accused men, lots of women and children lie about this kind of thing". And then they praise the latest Woody Allen movie or opine that Bill Cosby might be innocent after all, 40 accusations be damned.
Nobody ever goes to a murder victim's funeral and lectures the bereft family on how the deceased could have easily avoided being murdered, and that it's not even certain if he was murdered at all, maybe he just killed himself and blamed it on someone else because he's such an attention whore. But lots of people, especially conservatives, do exactly that when it comes to rape. That is rape culture.
Neither does the marketing of the movie. All I read is that she "hooks up with a stranger" (movie critique) or "has a one-night stand" (official movie poster). Can you say rape culture?
I don't remember exactly how they cut the scene, if there was a fade-out of some sorts, but I remember that I immediately assumed she had passed out from something that was in her drink. I also immediately knew that she had just regained consciousness when they cut to the rape scene. She seemed disoriented to me, as if she had only just realized what was being done to her.
share
I don't remember exactly how they cut the scene, if there was a fade-out of some sorts, but I remember that I immediately assumed she had passed out from something that was in her drink. I also immediately knew that she had just regained consciousness when they cut to the rape scene. She seemed disoriented to me, as if she had only just realized what was being done to her.
For many in the audience these are the sounds of a woman trying to fight her own orgasm hoping that the guy doesn't cum.
It would be very disconcerting if that were the case, because "we should stop" means just that during a sexual encounter. Always, without exception. Especially when it's followed up with "I'm serious" and desperate pleading.
No means no and stop means stop. Always. Even if it started out as a consensual encounter, when you're told to stop, you stop. Immediately. Continued intercourse after a withdrawal of consent is rape. There is no arguing that.
share
No means no and stop means stop. Always. Even if it started out as a consensual encounter, when you're told to stop, you stop. Immediately. Continued intercourse after a withdrawal of consent is rape. There is no arguing that.
Once again, this is not up for debate. Stop means stop. We should stop means we should stop. Immediately, without discussion. Withdrawal of consent = immediate cessation of sexual activities. Anything else might land you in prison.
share
Once again, this is not up for debate. Stop means stop. We should stop means we should stop. Immediately, without discussion. Withdrawal of consent = immediate cessation of sexual activities. Anything else might land you in prison.
i agree guys. i kinda sorta liked the movie (not the rape part) but the synopsis/plot wording is 100% wrong and not to sound over dramatic but it saying it's a "one night stand" and not the drugging/rape that it was is a bit offensive.
share[deleted]
It was implied that she was roofied. She was also clearly intoxicated and therefore can't consent. Plus she told him to stop.
sharebecause she said no, and in the scene in the apartment with that junkie guy he tells her that he sold rohypnol to that creepy guy
shareagain. Why would you say she is raped? She went to his car with no problems.
We don't know she went into his car with no problems, because it doesn't show that, it simply shows him drugging her, and next thing you know he's banging her in the car, and she kept saying to stop, so it was rape. Anything after "Stop" is rape. That's not up for debate.
---
Web: www.jmberman.com
[deleted]
You're an idiot, and you're now on ignore. Good riddance.
---
Web: www.jmberman.com
You're an idiot...
Hey that's not very nice :P I never said I was not crazy... difference is, I embrace it and use it to my benefit.
~*~
http://www.jmberman.com
You are a giant *beep* *beep* I was going to say "I hope this same thing happens to a woman you care about" but I'm not going to stoop to your low-life level so I will say this instead: imagine if the same thing happened to a woman you care about and then come back here and tell us how cool you are with it. Please, I can't wait to hear your reply you devolved savage.
share I'm starting to think netflix is showing a recut of the film.
It doesn't show him drugging her. She never says no or stop. We don't see her in the back seat we just hear her suggesting "we should stop" the moans and pants more. Even the Closed captioning shows it.
She went to the car to screw the guy and it probably felt weird because he was infected. Nothing to do with rape, I don't know where anyone gets that idea from. She wasn't raped period.
share.. with a random stranger"
EHM NO, a young girl gets drugged and raped by a stranger
Don't try to cash in love, that check will always bounce.share
She didn't want to go to the police because she didn't want Nikki to find out (she explicitly says that to Alice). Nikki didn't seem like a very understanding person. The doctor was brusque and seemed judgmental, and she had no rapport with him. She didn't want to admit to sex with a man at all. Lots of people don't report their rapes, unfortunately, due to embarrassment, shame, confusion, etc. The whole point of her being a lesbian was (in my opinion) to make the rape even less ambiguous.
My interpretation of her infecting the guy was that the virus was compelling her to spread it. It had obviously affected her brain. I could be wrong about that, though. He was also supposed to be the "nice" guy, who wouldn't use her for sex, but he was willing to do it even when she was obviously upset and ill (however, he was in no way a rapist like the first dude).
They're coming to get you, Barbara!
She didn't want to go to the police because she didn't want Nikki to find out (she explicitly says that to Alice). Nikki didn't seem like a very understanding person. The doctor was brusque and seemed judgmental, and she had no rapport with him. She didn't want to admit to sex with a man at all. Lots of people don't report their rapes, unfortunately, due to embarrassment, shame, confusion, etc. The whole point of her being a lesbian was (in my opinion) to make the rape even less ambiguous.
Don't try to cash in love, that check will always bounce.share
I see what you're saying. Thank you for explaining!
I'm going to get pedantic for a sec here, so I apologize if that's not what you're looking for. There's a common misconception about how women respond to rape - with complete conviction and tears. Yes, that is a very common response. However, in the case of "date" rape (I really hate that term, as it implies that it's qualitatively different than "real" rape), there is often confusion and guilt added to everything else. I feel like the movie showed her remembering in flashbacks, the same way she would have if she'd actually been drugged/drunk to the point of blackout. I think that's where my problem lies - not so much with the absolute a**ssholes who claim it wasn't rape at all (those are either trolls or terrible people), but with the idea that this didn't show a CLEAR rape, because it does. My opinion is that the filmmakers didn't have her explicitly SAY it was a rape because of her ex gf (whom I agree was a total jerk), and also because admitting you've been raped to yourself is a big deal. She also didn't exactly have time to process what happened, what with her eyes filling with blood and her skin falling off. I've volunteered with a rape crisis center for years, so I guess I shouldn't expect everyone to have my experience and academic knowledge of the subject, but it does frustrate me. It shows the need for more education in the area of consent.
Have a good day:)
They're coming to get you, Barbara!
I understand completely your point of view and know that not all women would respond to such an event in the same way, but for the sake of the story where the writer/director/actors can decided how the character will react, I just felt it kind of muddled because her reaction does not incite in us the audience the proper emotional investment in the character.
It's like when you see a character get shot or cut and they don't cry out in pain, they just act like it didn't hurt. Can some people in real life have that reaction? Sure. Is it less cinematic than going with the default painful reaction? Yes.
The simple fact that the IMDB description calls it a one night stand just proves that the filmmakers did not portray the rape in a comprehensive way. But given the fact the character goes on to commit murder and intentionally infects another person makes any sympathy I had for her completely gone. Somehow I doubt this was the filmmakers's intention, and if it was then the filmmakers are idiots.
Don't try to cash in love, that check will always bounce.share
I'm going to get pedantic for a sec here
When a DRUGGED woman who is obviously confused about what is happening says no (which she clearly says numerous times), yes, her partner should get off of her. Of course, a normal human being wouldn't intentionally drug someone, then lead them stumbling off to an isolated spot, away from witnesses. It's rape, dude. Being gay or straight has nothing to do with it. Panting and moaning have nothing to do with it. Poorly-worded IMDB summaries have nothing to do with it (I believe it has been changed). And irrelevant links to Wikipedia have nothing to do with it, but thanks for sharing a non sequitor definition of non sequitor lol. I'm a woman, but if my (male) partner said no or appeared not to be into it, I would stop immediately.
My suggestion on the "releasing inside her?" Stop. You are under no obligation to finish with anyone. If you continue, that's your choice. Do you understand how being surreptitiously drugged removes that choice? Ergo, rape. Not that complicated. Criminy. I'm terrified for my niece to start dating.
They're coming to get you, Barbara!
My suggestion on the "releasing inside her?" Stop. You are under no obligation to finish with anyone. If you continue, that's your choice. Do you understand how being surreptitiously drugged removes that choice? Ergo, rape. Not that complicated. Criminy. I'm terrified for my niece to start dating.
My suggestion on the "releasing inside her?" Stop. You are under no obligation to finish with anyone. If you continue, that's your choice. Do you understand how being surreptitiously drugged removes that choice? Ergo, rape. Not that complicated. Criminy. I'm terrified for my niece to start dating.
When a DRUGGED woman who is obviously confused about what is happening says no (which she clearly says numerous times), yes, her partner should get off of her. Of course, a normal human being wouldn't intentionally drug someone, then lead them stumbling off to an isolated spot, away from witnesses. It's rape, dude. Being gay or straight has nothing to do with it. Panting and moaning have nothing to do with it. Poorly-worded IMDB summaries have nothing to do with it (I believe it has been changed). And irrelevant links to Wikipedia have nothing to do with it, but thanks for sharing a non sequitor definition of non sequitor lol. I'm a woman, but if my (male) partner said no or appeared not to be into it, I would stop immediately.
My suggestion on the "releasing inside her?" Stop. You are under no obligation to finish with anyone. If you continue, that's your choice. Do you understand how being surreptitiously drugged removes that choice? Ergo, rape. Not that complicated. Criminy. I'm terrified for my niece to start dating.
And although she was currently dating a woman she mentions that she hasn't slept with a man in some months, which means she used to sleep with men or could possibly be bi. I also didn't see the doctor as being judgmental, he was just trying to get the truth out of a woman who was clearly holding back and not being totally honest about her situation.
This is why I dislike feminist ideology. Examining your post here alone speaks volumes of real rape culture.
Lets start this off with saying, this is a bloody movie, not an encyclopedia into how everything should be interpreted by people or spoiling a fact in the movie that was left ambiguous in the trailer. (Seriously, the fact she was roofied is a spoiler that all of you are doing.)
Next, lets examine your comment, you are quick to defend the woman for spreading an infection through sexual means (which is illegal and constitutes as rape if the other person does not know they have an infection that can spread to them) as the infection "made her do it".
But the guy who spread it to her, he's a rapist pig. There's no talk about the infection in him making him do it.
That is of course throwing aside it all just being a plot for a movie.
So tell me, how does it constitute as rape when it's a guy spreading it to a girl, but not when a girl goes on a psycho rampage spreading it to others? This feminist ideology has it nailed into you all that only men can be rapists, ignoring any fact of women being able to.
Let me ask you something though, if a man and a woman are drunk and they have sex, while having sex while under influence constitutes as rape, who is the rapist? I don't care about your tailored reply to me, I want you to be honest with yourself on that sexist stereotype.
Also you'll notice I blacked out quite a bit of my post, unlike the majority of IMDB users, I actually try to protect people from reading spoilers.
I don't know whether the filmmakers intended for it to be ambiguous or not, but I am kind of glad that the film doesn't use the word "rape" or have Sam call it a rape, precisely because it has sparked this conversation here. Growing up, all the media portrayals I saw, and all I heard and read portrayed rape as a man forcing a woman to have sex via brute force, or with the threat of a weapon, while she screams and struggles. I later learned that rape does not always look like this and that there are a myriad of ways in which consent can be violated. When compared to the definition of rape I learned young, and that is predominantly portrayed in film and media, I can see how some would perceive this rape to be ambiguous, which is why it's important to have this discussion, and I'm also glad that this film explores a kind of rape different than what I, at least, have previously been exposed to via media. I am also pleased at Sam's reaction to the rape, because based on what I've heard from a variety of people who have had similar experiences, it is more realistic. In a society where the term "ambiguous" seems appropriate to some to describe something like rape, it makes perfect sense that Sam did not immediately classify her experience as rape. The flashes she has of moments during the rape, as well as her lack of memory support the (what I perceived to be) clear interpretation that she was drugged.
shareI like your post and agree that there are varying degrees of rape and that we should all be aware of that fact, but at the end of the day this is a movie about a girl who turns into a flesh eating zombie.
I'm just saying I would expect the more realistic kind of rape to be in an arthouse film or drama, but not a zombie movie. I just feel it sends mixed messages for this particular genre.
Don't try to cash in love, that check will always bounce.share
Thank you for your respectful response. :) What mixed messages does it send in this (I'm assuming you mean zombie/horror) genre?
share
IMDb member since August 2008
I don't know whether the filmmakers intended for it to be ambiguous or not, but I am kind of glad that the film doesn't use the word "rape" or have Sam call it a rape, precisely because it has sparked this conversation here. Growing up, all the media portrayals I saw, and all I heard and read portrayed rape as a man forcing a woman to have sex via brute force, or with the threat of a weapon, while she screams and struggles. I later learned that rape does not always look like this and that there are a myriad of ways in which consent can be violated. When compared to the definition of rape I learned young, and that is predominantly portrayed in film and media, I can see how some would perceive this rape to be ambiguous, which is why it's important to have this discussion, and I'm also glad that this film explores a kind of rape different than what I, at least, have previously been exposed to via media. I am also pleased at Sam's reaction to the rape, because based on what I've heard from a variety of people who have had similar experiences, it is more realistic. In a society where the term "ambiguous" seems appropriate to some to describe something like rape, it makes perfect sense that Sam did not immediately classify her experience as rape. The flashes she has of moments during the rape, as well as her lack of memory support the (what I perceived to be) clear interpretation that she was drugged.
In a society where the term "ambiguous" seems appropriate to some to describe something like rape, it makes perfect sense that Sam did not immediately classify her experience as rape.
outside of the roofies there is no indication this was rape unless we saw differen't cuts of the film.
We all want to protect women but your making things worse when by trying to to convince them they were raped when they succumb to their passions and regreted it later. I can accept the "I felt ashamed and didn't want to tell anyone till now" explanation but I'm completly unerved when a woman says in court "It wasn't till 4 days later that I realized I was raped". They might as well have said "4 days later changed my mind".
Is the implication she was roofied not enough to convince you that she was raped?
She also said "we should stop" during the sexual encounter, after which he did not stop. This is also an indication of rape.
Assuming that women will start reporting sexual assault because of regretting a sexual encounter is, for the most part, absurd.
I don't think a rape accusation is the greatest way to shame a man. Young boys and men use the term "rape" colloquially in place of "pwn" or "own". The thing that seems to evoke the greatest response of shame in men, in my experience, is anything that feminizes or "emasculates" them. Rape affirms their masculinity by asserting dominance over a woman. Am I saying that men are proud of rape, that rape doesn't bring shame to many men, or that men condone rape? No! Not at all. Just disagreeing that rape is the ultimate source of shame among men.
So I rightly assume neither party may be telling the truth in a rape case which is what I assumed how the courts were supposed to operate as well.
I don't think a rape accusation is the greatest way to shame a man. Young boys and men use the term "rape" colloquially in place of "pwn" or "own". The thing that seems to evoke the greatest response of shame in men, in my experience, is anything that feminizes or "emasculates" them. Rape affirms their masculinity by asserting dominance over a woman. Am I saying that men are proud of rape, that rape doesn't bring shame to many men, or that men condone rape? No! Not at all. Just disagreeing that rape is the ultimate source of shame among men.
However, "It wasn't till 4 days later that I realized I was raped" doesn't preclude the possibility of rape due to the culture we live in.
The movie would have worked better if either she was bi or was having problems with her cheating boyfriend and sleeps with a guy on the fly to get back at him and gets sick but doesn't tell anyone lest her infidelity be uncovered.
She was raped.
It's clear. You can argue it all you like, but the film makes it clear if you were paying attention or possess any insight at all.
There is a scene where B.J bumps into her deliberately and she spills her drink, and he offers her a replacement (presumably roofied) drink. (See link for recap of scene).
"Please. We should stop. Please". It doesn't matter how she says it, it still means no.
I think the "moaning" and "panting" sounds she was making was from pain and/or the guy raping her was crushing her, also panting because she was in distress/panicking.
She probably woke up in the middle of being raped and still under the effects of the drug. She would have been confused and disoriented. which explains her weak protest to the rape.
Due to the rohypnol, she would have had limited awareness of what was going on, grogginess, hazy mind, head spinning, impaired judgement. Of course she would have been vague and confused about what was happening to her.
Of course she wouldn't have told her girlfriend about it, out of shame, guilt, doubt, and fear. She probably just wanted it to go away, like it never happened.
I think the movie did well at depicting a realistic drug rape. If you didn't pick up on it, you were not paying attention or you lack the intelligence and insight to see things for what they truly are. No means no, doesn't matter how it's said, it doesn't matter if your girlfriend is pulling you toward her as she's saying no, you should stop and confirm it before going ahead. The fact that this guy totally disregarded her pleas and kept going is DEFINITELY rape. Anyone who argues that has the mentality of a rapist.
http://www.filmdeviant.com/2014/03/film-review-contracted-2013.html
I can't believe women still fall for these amateurish bait tactics of desperate guys who will do anything to get laid. Losing track of what drink's yours? Really? Do you ladies get so 'out of it' that you don't know what you're drinking!? Strange, CREEPY, unknown guy hands you an open cup drink and you just take it?!? Come on, ladies. Guys are twice your size, twice as strong as you, and thinking about getting in your panties 24/7. You've got to be smarter in life when it comes to these situations.
First of all, go into parties with a level head. Be aware that guys are there TO GET LAID. Under no circumstances should you have too much to drink, even if you're with other girls. Under NOOOO circumstances should you take an open drink from anyone you don't know. Hell, you shouldn't even trust anyone that you know who has 'loose cannon' qualities, even if he's 'cool'. Have a plan to get home. Sharks count on the helpless damsel who missed her ride from the party. One that is inebriated and desperate to get home (poor judgment) is the easiest of targets.
These things aren't hard to do because AS A GUY I do them. I babysit two drinks all night. I've NEVER been drunk, and certainly would never GET drunk at a party or club where I don't know anyone there, particularly if I was a woman.
In this day and age and MEDIA access, things like this should NEVER happen.
-----------------------
When we're thinking about our own brain, would that be a mental paradox??
Come on, ladies. Guys are twice your size, twice as strong as you, and thinking about getting in your panties 24/7. You've got to be smarter in life when it comes to these situations.
I'm not saying this main character made good choices, but it still was not her fault. And you make it sound like it is. Also I can see you have a high opinion of the male gender...
She was raped.
It's clear. You can argue it all you like, but the film makes it clear if you were paying attention or possess any insight at all.
There is a scene where B.J bumps into her deliberately and she spills her drink, and he offers her a replacement (presumably roofied) drink. (See link for recap of scene).
"Please. We should stop. Please". It doesn't matter how she says it, it still means no.
I'm sorry it was more ambiguous than that. You don't KNOW for sure the guy roofi-ed her. She was confused, but she didn't really act like she was raped during or after. And she seemed rather guilty about it. I'm not saying it WASN'T rape either, but it just isn't always that black and white. Although the guy's obviously the bad guy in this movie regardless.
The problem with this "rape culture" stuff is that it sometimes a young man and a young woman might BOTH be drunk and making bad decisions (with no roofie-ing involved) and the girl charges the guy with rape. Well, why not vice versa? And are people not held responsible for what they do when they're drunk? By some feminist definitions of rape, I've been "raped" by both men and women since I have certainly regretted a lot of things I did drunk, sexually or otherwise. But doing something you regret after you willingly drink yourself into a blackout is NOT the same as being drugged and raped, and unfortunately there is a big gray area there which today's militants feminists often fail to acknowledge.
"Let be be finale of seem/ The only emperor is the Emperor of Ice Cream"