By he, I assume you mean Fincher. Yes, the movie paints a lot of its female characters in a very unflattering light, but I don't think that he's pushing a feminist agenda.
The book might be perceived as "a feminist's dream", because most of the central characters are written as full and complex without regard to gender. They may stereotype themselves and each other according to gender roles, but Flynn, the author does not. She has said men are allowed - as fictitious characters - to be bad in a way women are not. And I truly don't believe that any feminist has ever worried about feminism being destroyed with GG, more to expose that certain patterns are acceptable when it comes to men, but not women.
... but in all the women who blindly believes her, like the host, Ellen Abbott who blindly believes Amy and accuses Nick of almost everything possible.
I think one of the the main intentions Fincher has had, is that highlight how the media works, today worse than ever, but not because they are women. Now most of the reporters who handles such cases are women, which also shows a distortion that is not okay. Where are the men?
But what I think Fincher also is looking for is about us, the audience, or rather people in general. And the media, paired with morality, or rather lack of. I've said this before, but aside from that Amy suffers from some kind of personality disorder, psycho or sociopath, which doesn't really have to do with morality in the ordinary sense, the morality of the movie is also that the media we have today is completely ruthless, trying to sell just about anything at any cost. And once the media hype is spinning, there's no end to it. But a huge middle finger get the people, the average Joe, who are swallowing everything what the media says, without questioning practically – nothing.
reply
share