Very pro-feminist


Its a good film, not satisfied with the ending but overall is pro-feminist

Now, whenever a woman tells a story about how bad she was being treated from her boyfriend/husband you'll have a bunch of blind miserable loud mouth on this woman side not even knowing the man's side of the story.

reply

It's neither pro nor anti-feminist. You could make equally plausible cases for either, which means they cancel each other out.

reply

Only someone who is uneducated about feminism would arrive at that conclusion.

reply

I saw the movie. Did my OP offended you?

reply

No you post makes me laugh because you didn't understand the movie. Amy is not a feminist character.

reply

^this because She is hateful to other women and plus the movie makes her look bad or at least doesn't go out of its way to make her look good/justified in her actions.

reply

It's actually the complete opposite. We see how Amy almost destroyed one man's life by falsely accusing him of rape (something that sadly happens in the real world), and then we see her almost destroy another man's life by falsely accusing him of a myriad of terrible things he didn't do (like hitting her, using her for sex, threatening to kill her, etc.) and everyone feels sympathy for her because she plays the victim so well and people naturally believe a 'victimized" woman over a man any day, and then she straight up murders a man and convinces everyone it was justified because he was raping her, when he wasn't.

Her entire character is a burning indictment of what feminism has become; anger and lies towards the opposite sex, as well as utter contempt for other women that don't share their same view point of the world. It's all the more impactful because it was written by a woman.







---------------------------------
Delicious - http://imgur.com/50eSH9o

reply

Her entire character is a burning indictment of what feminism has become. . .


Only the feminism of your fevered imagination, not mainstream feminism as it exists in any verifiable objective reality.

reply

Her entire character is a burning indictment of what feminism has become; anger and lies towards the opposite sex, as well as utter contempt for other women that don't share their same view point of the world.

This ^^ and especially the bolded part, is coming from someone who hasn't got a clue what feminism stands for.

Amy wasn't a feminist, Amy was a child who throughout her childhood never was allowed to be - just a kid. And who the entire time was promoted and marketed - through crazy parents - to be someone who was unattainable and flawless; "The Amazing Amy". Something that no child should have to endure, and at the same time, is something which hardly happens, without damaging said child. That is was what made Amy a psychopath, not a feminist.

reply

Feminists are overgrown children whining about something they didn't get in life.

Get off your soapbox while I play you a tune on the tiniest violin.

reply

Feminists are overgrown children whining about something they didn't get in life.
And that is your argument against feminism? Well, it sucks. Try again.

reply

You don't need much of a strong argument against Feminism. It kind of vanquishes itself on its own with pure stupidity and nonsense these days.

reply

Your post is as lame as the poster LukasLoves post was. Either come up with a GOOD argument, or don't post at all.

reply

My argument was short, sweet and entirely accurate.

reply

OK, but where is your argument?

reply

The movie isn't not feminist in any way. If anything, it makes them look bad. The only thing feminist about it is in the real world, feminists find Amy to be a hero. There's a thread further down here where many express admiration for Amy. I think many women would love to do this to their cheating man. But of course that is just fantasy, and they would never actually do it.

reply

Yeah. This movie exposes their psychotic cult for what it is.

Get off your soapbox while I play you a tune on the tiniest violin.

reply

The book was written by a woman. And she said, I destroyed feminism with this.

reply

[deleted]

Right. But in majority of horror movies where the killer isn't suspected to be a woman, such as Scream when they theorize who the killer is at the beginning of the movie, the main characters suggest it's a woman and the two eventual killers say no way it could be a woman, you need it to be a man. Still, in a way i see that as sending a Feminist message that "women can be killers too" because the girl character replies to the original dismissed claim that women can't be serial killers, because sexism. Then when the killer is a woman, you go "oh wow, it's a woman?"...even if it's a negative thing such as murder, it's not "right" for it to be sexist, because "women are very capable blah blah blah"

I also think because of modern day Feminism, is why the movie ends the way it ends with Amy getting away with everything and pinning everything on Neil Patrick Harris. Nick was in no mans land the whole time, the media portrayed him already as an *beep* from the beginning. When he questions how Amy was able to slice NPH's throat, he was quickly shot down but the cop. The Female cop saw flaws in her story too but she was quickly shot down. All the others saw was "poor Amy" drenched in blood sitting in the wheelchair but they could NEVER imagine something like that but because she was a rape victim to everyone and even was a SURVIVOR to everyone. That's that whole anti-rape culture thing, don't question anything about the victim. Forget justice, facts and logic. These guys should all be in jail. Just look at the mess that was the Duke Lacrosse case. That's why I had a hate/love thing with the ending.

Amy knew exactly what she was doing the whole time, and she knew she could play off of the victimhood. You have to thing Feminism in this movie definitely, but I'd say it mocked it. She was a hero to everyone, but she was a "piece of shi*" murder...

reply

Why does this have to be about feminism?!? Why can't you just have a cool movie about an evil mastermind who screws over her husband because she happens to be a woman married to a man?

Did people read some larger gender narrative into the ending of The Usual Suspects, when Keyser Soze's real identity is revealed and he escapes, scot free? What about Silence of the Lambs, when the genuinely evil Hannibal Lecter is shown not only out in the world and free, but literally about to murder and then devour somebody? There are movies all the time that show male characters doing awful things and then not being suitably punished for it. So this one features a woman. So what?

You buy egg roll!

reply

Thank you. The voice of reason. I'm so sick of idiots making every movie on IMDB politicsl because they are so full of hate and fear.

I simply am not there...

reply

Will they ever make a major motion picture illustrating what it's like to be an abused husband and all of the hardships that go with it?

I want to see a movie that exposes the fact that there are no shelters for abused men. Hell, men can't even take their children away from abusive mothers without risking a charge of kidnapping.

I want to see that movie.

I'm sure the feminist community won't allow it.

reply

I'm sure the feminist community won't allow it.

Ok, I get it. This ^^ is your sweet and entirely accurate argument. I'm allowed to laugh? Probably not, but I'll help you out: https://www.helpguide.org/articles/abuse/help-for-abused-men.htm

reply

It's a troll account that's been around for a week.

reply

Aha, that's what I suspected. Thanks for telling me! :)

reply

The book war written by a woman. And she said "I have destroyed feminism with this"

reply

But then I hardly think that it worked, because no self-respecting woman who calls herself a feminist would identify herself with Amy. Amy was a psychopath and if you want to be kind, a sociopath.

reply

Maybe he's not talking about feminism in Amy, but in all the women who blindly believes her, like the host, Ellen Abbott who blindly believes Amy and accuses Nick of almost everything possible.

And maybe Flynn isn't referring to feminism in its original term, but the more let's call it "modern" take of feminism which, whether you wanna believe it or not, does revolve around women's despite towards men and certain other women, just as Amy is seen despise almost everyone she encounters in the movie. Flynn might have been exaggerating when she said she destroyed feminism, but she might also have meant the "modern" kind of feminism and we can all hope that she in fact does destroy that.

Caesar. Is. Home.

reply

By he, I assume you mean Fincher. Yes, the movie paints a lot of its female characters in a very unflattering light, but I don't think that he's pushing a feminist agenda.

The book might be perceived as "a feminist's dream", because most of the central characters are written as full and complex without regard to gender. They may stereotype themselves and each other according to gender roles, but Flynn, the author does not. She has said men are allowed - as fictitious characters - to be bad in a way women are not. And I truly don't believe that any feminist has ever worried about feminism being destroyed with GG, more to expose that certain patterns are acceptable when it comes to men, but not women.

... but in all the women who blindly believes her, like the host, Ellen Abbott who blindly believes Amy and accuses Nick of almost everything possible.
I think one of the the main intentions Fincher has had, is that highlight how the media works, today worse than ever, but not because they are women. Now most of the reporters who handles such cases are women, which also shows a distortion that is not okay. Where are the men?

But what I think Fincher also is looking for is about us, the audience, or rather people in general. And the media, paired with morality, or rather lack of. I've said this before, but aside from that Amy suffers from some kind of personality disorder, psycho or sociopath, which doesn't really have to do with morality in the ordinary sense, the morality of the movie is also that the media we have today is completely ruthless, trying to sell just about anything at any cost. And once the media hype is spinning, there's no end to it. But a huge middle finger get the people, the average Joe, who are swallowing everything what the media says, without questioning practically – nothing.

reply

[deleted]