Really couldn't get past the nudity - The Lifeguard (2013) Discussion

[–] Airman87 11 years ago

What nudity?

Did you even see the film?

reply

[–] cfinde 11 years ago

Yes I did see the film and it was blatant vulgar nudity on display...

reply

[–] Airman87 11 years ago

Could you elaborate on that.

I don't remember seeing any genitalia or breasts.

reply

[–] Zakredding 11 years ago

I have to agree as *beep* as the film was I can't remember seeing much nudity although I did mentally block out the male nudity scenes where she yanked down his pants in the bathroom scene. Can't remember any other scenes though.

reply

[–] cfinde 11 years ago

Too much penis.

reply

[–] fluffchop 10 years ago

Um, that was hardly too much of anything really.

reply

[–] sephkane 11 years ago

Did you even see the film?

----
You're as obvious as Quentin Tarantino's foot fetish.

reply

[–] agentalbert 11 years ago

Don't remember much nudity at all. A bit of the vice principal's husband junk when he's standing in the bathroom and maybe and ass shot of the boy Leigh had a fling with. But it's not much and hardly worth mentioning. If someone couldn't get past that tiny bit of nudity, they've got a hangup.

reply

[–] RoyWilliamsbeatsCoachK 11 years ago

There was probably nudity for about 3 seconds if that. Wow if that scared you.

reply

[–] MongoLloyd 11 years ago

BAHAHAHAHA

"Nudity."

The movie is rated R, jacka[ss.

.

reply

[–] cowgoesmoo 11 years ago

Don't feed the trolls.

reply

[–] lonniemac 11 years ago

What nudity? If u can't get past what was in this movie then maybe u should stick to G-rated family flicks.

reply

[–] tintinherge 10 years ago

I liked the sex scenes , she was hot

reply

[–] fluffchop 10 years ago

Totally gratuitous and nasty.

I think you need to work on your definitions of "gratuitous and
nasty". While you're at it you might want to look at "totally" as a subject of interest.

reply