Dude!

An illegal war

With a UN mandate and congressional support. Everybody in the world thought that Saddam was a threat and a danger, and had stocks of chemical, biological, and perhaps nuclear weaponry that he'd already shown a willingness to use in the past.

How was the war illegal? What lies were told? If you point to a bull**** left-wing website to answer for you, I will not read it. Tell me in your own words, what constitutes ILLEGAL activity on the part of the Bush administration in the run up to the Iraq War.

The mistake was perhaps an overestimation of that capability. But in my opinion, when it comes to such dangerous weaponry, it is MUCH better to overestimate your enemy, than to underestimate him. Schwarzkopf VASTLY overestimated the conventional military capabilities of the 'battle hardened' iraqi army during Desert Storm, and the engagement was an overwhelming and decisive victory that cemented the western allies as the undisputed masters of conventional warfare. Do you disagree?

Can you prove that Bush the younger's overestimation of Hussein's non-conventional capabilities was deliberate, as part of a greater deception to move the country toward war? If nobody else has, you certainly can't. So stop with this 'illegal war' bull****.

Let's deal with Obama, Bush is in the past.

Okay...so for the millionth time. People around the world were rioting over this video...sight unseen by most. People have died over cartoons that, if they saw them at all it was only when their Imams themselves "showed" them, because all news agencies were afraid to show them because of death/bombing threats. People have died over koran burnings...without seeing the burnt korans.

Yeah. ****ed up people aren't they.

Show the memo

Email from Ben Rhodes, Deputy National Security Advisor (if Obama and Clinton didn't know what this guy was telling his people, then they are HORRIBLE leaders). Stated goal of the upcoming talk show interviews with Ms. Rice (liar) was "To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy." Sure as hell sounds like passing the buck to me. Doing anything possible to take advantage of this convenient internet video to avoid appearing as if Al Qaeda had struck a blow against America under Obama's watch (which they clearly did). After all his bluster about Al Qaeda being 'on the ropes' and such, and all his soft talking the Muslim world and trying to be friends, I can understand it. But that doesn't make it right.

He and Clinton should have IMMEDIATELY acknowledged this as a terrorist attack by islamic militants intent on attacking American interests abroad. Which is EXACTLY what it was. That would have been the truth. The American people would not be reacting the way they are if Obama and Clinton had been up front about that rather than trying to blame others for their failures. Which they are STILL doing to this day. They are STILL trying to press this bull**** story that they did nothing wrong. They are STILL stonewalling so that nobody can get near the truth of the situation. That is not leadership. That is cowardice and dishonesty. Character traits that a President should not have. They didn't secure the ambassador and the embassy, and then when the attack came, they failed to deploy forces to even ATTEMPT a rescue. Even if there is little hope of success in such a situation, you HAVE TO TRY! Every soldier, and every real leader knows that.

A brief story to illustrate Obama's COMPLETE lack of leadership qualities. On July 3rd, 1863, General Robert E. Lee, Commanding General of the Army of Northern Virginia launched an ill-conceived, and ultimately disastrous assault on an entreanched Union position at the Battle of Gettysburg. Elements of three Confederate divisions were cut down on the field, for absolutely no gain in tactical or strategic position. As the survivors and hundreds of wounded (many of whom would later perish) trundled back to their lines, General Lee realized the scope and scale of his colossal blunder. You know what he said? He said, to all his troops, and in front of all his commanders, 'IT IS MY FAULT'. It is ENTIRELY my fault, he said. After the retreat back into Confederate territory, he contacted Jefferson Davis, the Confederate President. You know what he told President Davis? He said "this was entirely my fault President Davis. Don't blame the men. They did their job. The disaster at Gettysburg was entirely my fault." Then he offered to resign his commission in the Confederate Army. It was refused.

I would venture to state with certainty that blaming ANYBODY else never even entered General Lee's thought process. To do so would have been morally reprehensible to him. My point here, is that a REAL leader, like General Robert E. Lee, accepts responsibility when he makes a mistake, and gets his own men killed. Robert E. Lee was a true leader. Beloved by his soldiers, and fellow officers alike, in spite of his mistakes. A man respected, and admired for his leadership qualities by contemporaries and military historians North and South. Robert E. Lee was a leader. Obama, is a CHILD by comparison. Selfish, greedy, with no thought to accepting responsibility for the mistakes he's made for fear of tarnishing his reputation, which clearly means more to him than the lives of good and decent people. What right does he have to make that judgment. It's pathetic that he has risen so far.

reply share

add reply

formatting help

It's self-explanatory...of course a blind sheep radical leftist like yourself will go out of your way to ignore the facts and continue calling one of the most damaging men in national history a "blessing" to America...because furthering your political ideologies is far more important to you than what's best for your country.

You are a true sociopath, a shining example of the type of person that a man like Obama appeals to.


+++by His wounds we are healed. - Isaiah 53:5+++

reply share

add reply

formatting help