Yeah it was over the top. But if by "dialogue" you're specifically referring to the frequent f-bombs, those are words within the dialogue. When you said "dialogue" I assumed you meant the overall content, meaning, manner of speaking, the way they interacted with each other. I can't blame you if you found that annoying or unlikeable, but I didn't mind it, and I've known people like that so it felt true to character for me, i.e. "normal" within the context of a particular crowd of people.
I might add that claiming someone isn't "normal" because they enjoyed dialogue you didn't is, well... a compliment! Anyone striving to be "normal" isn't challenging themselves, and typically indicates mediocrity and close-mindedness, i.e. a worldview that is constrained and limited by programming, nestled deep into a perceived safety bubble of thought.
_________________________________________
Never believe. Always question. Rebuke belief, a.k.a. bias, a.k.a. groupthink, a.k.a. ideology, the bane of skeptical, logical reason
reply
share