Since when can Marco's father wield a sword?
Against well trained Mongolian troops? LMFAO!
shareI wondered the same thing.
shareI think he was just "in the zone" more than anything.
shareAs did I.
There was not any suggestion previously that he had any training at all. I kind of groaned when I saw it, and then again when Marco belayed the archers who would have killed him. It is not like Marco had much of a relationship with him or that he had any real evidence of anything remotely resembling love from his father.
Personally, I think it would have been best if they didn't show him at all and just left us to assume that he slunk away during the battle.
"I care about the law. It's justice I don't give a toss about." Cleaver Greene
Did you miss the entire conversation where he said the army was his, and that he had been working to infiltrate the Mongolian Empire for years? That would mean he would have military training, I would imagine. It's a stupid retcon imo of his story, considering he was actually smuggling etc. before, but whatever (why bother risking smuggling if you're trying to infiltrate, why not just be a normal trader?).
He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man.
I agree. He said it was "his life's one goal". So I'm sure he would have been well trained. He's a survivor.
shareGood question. Honestly, I think just so he could come back for another season, and because they've lost continuity with some of the characters. I'm wondering if Italian investors for show require a quota of so many of their actors. He's a good actor in other work I've seen, but the character he plays in MP is far from a favorite, and gratingly obnoxious in all of the worst ways imaginable.
share