MovieChat Forums > Batman: The Dark Knight Returns, Part 2 (2013) Discussion > What happened to Oliver? So many questio...

What happened to Oliver? So many questions....


I hated this film. The first one, I liked. This one is just plain stupid at times...

First of all, Joker's voice was ridiculous.

2nd: Superman was a complete douche and more of a villain (since when does he kill?) He seems to kill some soldiers in the war and says to Bruce that he doesn't want to kill him but basically will if he has to just because the moronic President says so. This is what I hated most. They could've found another reason to have Superman and Batman fight without having to make Superman look like a dictator's pet.

3rd: It's inferred that Superman had something to do with Oliver's arm missing and his years in jail. I understood that Superman basically ripped his arm off so that he couldn't shoot arrows........ WHAT?! Ollie is one of Superman's closest friends! He'd never do that in a million years!

I haven't read Miller's comic, but honestly if this is based faithfully in his work it's just pushing it. It's one thing to explore a character in a way that's never been done before but it's another to destroy a character's moral center and everything he stands for.

I wouldn't have minded seeing Batman and Superman slug it out, but over better reasons. Maybe Batman could've been framed; maybe Superman went nuts 'cause of some weird new kryptonite, mind control, elseworld Superman, etc.

They were much more loyal to Batman. Sure, he was more brutal and even though he basically broke the Joker's neck he didn't kill him. Now THAT is taking a character over the edge but still maintaining what makes the character fascinating. That could've been done with Superman.

If you've got an ass I'll kick it!!! - Wimp Lo

reply

in this reality, supes has sold out to the man

the ultimate version of truth, justice and the american way

ollie is a radical hippie

reply

How can you say something its "Stupid" just because you dont understand it?

1st. Joker's voice was really well done. Dont be such a Hamill fan boy.

2nd. Super is in this movie, the same as Dr.Manhattan in "Watchmen"; most powerfull men alive, and still, working for the US goverment. Afterall, superman was created to keep the "justice, truth and the american way"

3rd. The gov doesnt want any other superheroes rather than sups; and they explain that: Batman retires, wonder woman goes back to her place, and probably Oliver continue with the Green Arrow vigilante work. So superman rips off his arm and put him into jail..

..cmon man, its not that hard!

reply

I'll agree with your call on Mark Hamill doing the voice of the Joker. I loved him, I will never get enough of him, but he retired and we have to just accept that someone else will have to take up the reigns. Let's give the next guy some support and accept that he will be a little different from Hamill.

Your second point is technically correct...but Superman isn't working for "The Man" he is working for the interests of the AMERICAN PEOPLE.

Your third point is flat out wrong. The Government is simply representative of its population. Its not the "Government" that wants the supers gone...its the groups of concerned mothers that Clark talks about, its the men on the street that, when interviewed, demand that Batman stop using violence to curb violence and its Robin's parents who would rather sit in front of their TV, smoke pot, and complain about how criminals only exist because of our fascist government.

While I'll admit that the comic book is better as saying this than this cartoon, all the pieces are there to put together if you watch closely enough. The average people rejected the supers because of jealousy, collateral damage and rampant liberalism (idealized by Robin's parents and the Joker's psychiatrist). This is said clearly throughout the film, little bits at a time, by most of the major characters.

Once the public reject the supers and elected politicians that supported that viewpoint, Superman accepted that judgement and assisted the people's desire for the rest of the supers unwilling to do so, to retire. The supers who didn't retire were "persuaded" more forcefully (like cutting off Oliver's arm).

So while you are technically right with your post, you've completely missed the point Miller is making...the Government isn't evil and neither is Superman. The American people have just turned into weak, apathetic duchebags who "Don't want to be reminded that giants walk the earth". Superman is following the law, just as he always has, and Batman is breaking it, just as he always has and, for the first time it has brought the two of them into direct conflict. The real difference between the two is that Batman is a symbol for taking charge of your life and doing something about it (that is in his origin story) while Superman sees his roll as a kind of police officer who is willing to work invisibly if that is the will of the people (the American Way).

BTW...you guys do realize that Superman wins in the end of this right???

Clark wanted Batman to stop being so "loud" with his heroics and, at the end, Bruce fakes his death and begins teaching others how to make small but important differences. Batman does kick the crap out of Superman...but Clark's wink, smile and, most importantly, not telling every that Bruce is alive says it all. As long as Batman stays retired and Bruce inspires in secret...everything is just fine.






----------
There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who get binary and those who don't.

reply

the Government isn't evil

But it is, remember what the president said:
"We have to defend our interest.. hmmm I mean our freedom"
It is pretty clear that the on going war has nothing to do with defending the little people.

and neither is Superman

Well, since the guy that orders him is, I cannot agree.

BTW...you guys do realize that Superman wins in the end of this right???

Clark wanted Batman to stop being so "loud" with his heroics and, at the end, Bruce fakes his death and begins teaching others how to make small but important differences. Batman does kick the crap out of Superman...but Clark's wink, smile and, most importantly, not telling every that Bruce is alive says it all. As long as Batman stays retired and Bruce inspires in secret...everything is just fine.

No.
Clark didn't want anything, he was just obeying to his orders like a puppet would.
At best, the only thing he wanted was to not kill Bruce, if possible.
Did he win? hmmm, I'd say it was a draw, but we don't know the future of that world. If the new sons of batman get to do even more than the Batman+Robin duo, then no, Superman and the president lost. If they just do a lot of minor thing maybe, but would Bruce really build an army to mop the streets and remove the garbage?
Plus now Clark is mortal (well for some time), if he was to fight Bruce again as a mortal, he'd probably lose.

reply

"But it is, remember what the president said..."

Not to mention that, "Pass the buck," press conference scene.

If you can get your hands on, "The Dark Knight Strikes Again," or if DC decides to make it into a movie. It explains why Superman is a government puppet.

"In his house at Rl'yeh, dead Cthulhu waits, dreaming."

reply

I have it but haven't read it yet. :)
I'm currently reading the 52s, I'll get to that one right after Thanks!

reply

Right on. Enjoy the new 52. :)

"In his house at Rl'yeh, dead Cthulhu waits, dreaming."

reply

Thanks, it's not really my thing though, way too many stories going around, but I'd thought I'd read it before Flashpoint (well I should have before Blackest Night but oh well...). I like reading GL the most so far...

reply

Thanks, it's not really my thing though, way too many stories going around, but I'd thought I'd read it before Flashpoint (well I should have before Blackest Night but oh well...). I like reading GL the most so far...

reply

I personally don't believe that Miller intended to show Superman as a villain. It's implied, more than stated, in the book that the Government put superheroes out of business around the time Batman retired. Superman compromised with the authorities, while Batman and Green Arrow refused. In 'Returns', Superman has to face the consequences of his own moral capitulation. Given Superman's character, I don't really see how he'd be able to refuse; for him, not being able to save lives would be as bad as Batman finds life as Bruce Wayne, maybe even worse.

An opinion is not offensive just because you do not agree with it.

reply