I discovered this a few weeks ago. It is on Amazon Prime,
all by the last season. In the beginning it was interesting
and stimulated by imagination ... I liked it and pretty much
binged-watched it right up to today when I am in season 4.
After all the murders, violence, lies, misery I am not sure I
want to or can continue to watch this to the end.
I know it is just a TV show, and a clever one mostly. but
having the heroes of the show be these murderous creeps
who destroy their own family and children, and always have
to lie and be ready to kill even their closest friends makes me
think this is both not-realistic, but also impossible, at least
the way it is portrayed.
I am no expert in espionage, and have not read a lot of books
on spying, but my impression from what I have is that it is not
so violent, and there is two sides of every story, and every
country does it against every other country. There are some
good scenes about the nature and reason for espionage, and
also the reason the USSR was so poor. Good things to think
about, but this show is just downright depressing.
Also, to see a good guy like Stan Beeman getting fooled and
jerked around by both sides and more or less portrayed as a
stooge bothers me. It may be that is a set up for his eventual
triumph over the Russians ... I am just not sure I can any more.
What do people who have watched this long-term think about it?
I am not sure I want to finish it.
It really happened. Yeah the real Philips and Elizabeths probably weren't as violent or risk-taking. But they still led this double life that they didn't even tell their own children about, so that aspect is true, which is strange enough.
I read an interview with a man whose parents were a part of the Illegals Program. He and his brother were both born in Canada to parents who they thought were Canadian citizens. They were shocked when the whole scheme fell apart. Not only did they find out their parents were agents from the Soviet Union, but they were yanked out of school and deported back to the USSR along with their parents.
Their parents returned as celebrated as heroes, however, the boys didn't know the language so struggled in school. They knew nothing of the culture, pop or otherwise, and their point of view of Russian society and history was through a distinctively Western lens. They had no friends. While their parents integrated back into Russian society, the boys tried to sue Canada to be allowed to return as citizens. I know that their request was rejected and they appealed. I don't know if the rejection was ever reversed.
It's a fascinating story.
But yeah, the parents weren't involved with anything violent like Phillip and Elizabeth, it was more about securing information and passing it back to their Soviet handlers.
That's the Andrey Bezrukov / Yelena Vavilova case, also mentioned in the Wikipedia article. They were arrested and deported to Russia by the FBI in 2010. Their kids seem to have regained Canadian citizenship now.
I'm glad to hear they regained their Canadian citizenship.
Last I heard they were trying to back in 2016 but an anon source in the WSJ had claimed the feds had him on tape being groomed by his parents to by FSB and loyal to Russia as 2nd gen illegals.
The anon source was most likely bullshitting, but the quote did seem to cause major headaches for them trying to get their Canadian citizenship back.
I'm not sure what you're asking because I've certainly seen bleaker and more depressing shows. A lot.
And as far as realism...it is based on true events with (I'm sure) some dramatic creative license.That's true of most anything based on true events in entertainment .
One reason that it took me a while to get around to watching this was the idea that 2 people could live intimately among other people and form bonds with them and then turn around and be able to constantly betray them and their trust and to also kill so easily any innocents that just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
And seem to do it without a thought.
But that's not true..It leaves its mark.
What you're not acknowledging or seeing (yet) is that this life of theirs does leave its mark and it does have an effect on them.
Stan is not a stooge..He just trusted that his neighbors were his neighbors..That doesn't make him a stooge. Just trusting.
He's been pretty ruthless in the past (as has some of the true Americans) and has done some bad things, too, but he isn't without conscience and it has affected him and made him want to be a better man.
Over time Phillip has changed and determined what he no longer live with and seems to have become a better man.
They have both changed their perspective of what they can and can not live with..And of what is right and wrong.
Oleg is another example of a man that just wants to do the right thing.
If you can acknowledge the changes in these people than it helps to seem less bleak and depressing.
I know that no government is perfect and no one is without flaws or sins but it's hard for me to see that Elizabeth is the hold out that still thinks the end justifies the means...even if it means sacrificing her children.
She'll still do whatever it takes no matter the cost. Her loyalty seems destined to doom her.
But if you're not compelled to finish this show and find out what happens to them then maybe you shouldn't.
Well, because you say it's depressing and you aren't sure you can continue because of all the horrible things these people do and have done..and the way that government uses these people to lie, manipulate and murder by lying and manipulating.
You are 2 seasons back and I'm trying not to say too much..But for me people doing bad things are not, if these characters are portrayed realistically or well written, existing as stagnate and in a vacuum. To me it is anything but depressing to see people evolve for the better and question their priorities and the mantra that seemed so inclusive to them at the beginning and to change in spite of what they've been taught to believe.
Everyone sees things differently..Maybe you find it depressing that the negative in people and government exists at all. Or maybe the fact that this can not end well for everyone involved is depressing to you or that the things some of them did in the past is irreversible and can never be overcome and you can never relate to any of them. I don't know.
But I find the fact that most of them question the powers they have served under to be a positive thing no matter what happens. And something worth watching to the end.
I find myself pulling for Oleg, Stan..and even Phillip and his children. Elizabeth, not so much.
The fact that it can't end well for all is probably a given that I accept. You can't live that life and have unicorns and rainbows.
What I think I said is that the show is so dark and depressing because all these innocent people are being murdered. It comes so fast. The colors on the screen are all muted at the warmth is totally drained out of the picture for most of the series. This is a trick directors, or cinematographers use regularly now to show scenes behind the iron curtain, or in Russia.
Seeing 5 seasons of that back to back is draining and seems fake to me. This pair is out working all day, and then out all night. Getting shot, contracting bioweapon viruses, knifed, or performing physical feats like jumping out of cars, or scaling fences. Then there are the disguises.
At first it is an interesting concept, but like most American TV they push the situation too far.
I feel similar to you about the characters. Elizabeth is my least favorite. She killed the old woman in the repair shop in cold blood, her co-worker who got cut on the contaminated corpse. For the value, entertainment or otherwise I got from the series, I just am glad I finished it through the season before last that was no free on Amazon Prime.
Some people are too far gone to evolve or for me to care about their evolution, and these two spies are one of them. And what they do to their own kids is another level of bad. Anyway, if I had it to do over again I am not sure I would choose to watch it.
I do get where you're coming from.
I have abandoned several films before finishing for that very reason...just too depressing, and several tv shows also. Even though it's fantasy I recently came to the conclusion that TWD just seemed to be all about making the characters as miserable as possible and their purpose in life just to kill other people with no payoff (just depressing and not entertaining...to me)..and there have been others.
For some reason The Americans just doesn't strike me that way. If there had been no change or evolution to the characters I would have dropped it long ago.
The whole redemption theme is a huge factor in a lot of media these days...or the opposite; good guy gone bad (aka as BB). It probably always was this way but today they do like to make things as dark as possible especially on Cable. Dark and gritty is the new theme. Sometimes I get tired of too much darkness and pessimism. I'm a big fan of hope.
Everyone has their likes and dislikes. If there's no characters you feel are worth pulling for then watching some shows just isn't going to be entertaining.
I understand that.
As far as plausibility; I figure we aren't watching every moment of these characters lives and they don't bother to show us much of their down time or the less dramatic moments of their lives when they're not involved in their spy games. And other things may be made more dramatic because it is fiction, after all, even if it is based loosely on some real events.
I am curious as to what tv shows you do watch regularly and don't have a problem with their darkness or depressing nature...
I agree with you on the The Walking Dead. They manipulate their audience as much as they manipulate the characters.
Redemption is the least thing I think about with those two. I don't see redemption as a big theme in "The Americans", and for me people who are so wrong are far away from redemption.
As to TV being dark and depressing, that is a good point. When a culture is saturated in this kind of stuff - and only this kind of stuff - there is an effect. Probably my current favorite show is "Homeland", which has some dark and depressing aspects, but in general there are the good-guys fighting hard to save the country. I think it is a great show. It is also not as manipulative and simple as "The Americans", and they do not, at least that I recognize, manipulate the color spectrum on the show.
I first heard about this in the movie "The Lives of Others", which was a story about surveillance society repression in Eastern Germany, and a great movie. But that was just a bit over two hours. In "The Americans", and especially on speed-watching or binge-watching the show it just goes on and on and my eyes and brain get a physical reaction. They digitally reduced the hot colors in the movie, reds and yellows.
In general I don't care for movies that try to manipulate people viscerally. I don't think that should be in a movie's toolbox. Movies should tell a story through the mind and emotions, not to try to bolster that with subliminal manipulation, especially if it is not explicitly mentioned.
Redemption is not, to me, always about the bad guy just becoming a good guy. I also see it in people overcoming manipulations that controlled their behavior and created excuses for them to do bad things. In The Americans that would be characters that have overcome being manipulated by their government and to begin thinking for themselves and not excusing "the end justifies the means". I think the growth of many of these characters is an important part of my enjoyment of this series. Otherwise I would lose interest.
It's interesting that the 2 shows you named are the 2 shows I have recently dropped (for being too depressing).
I think Homeland is depressing because it seems to show that anyone that has any decency has a weakness that ultimately gets them killed..So many die and for what cost? Nothing ever really seems to change and while ,yes .I would side with the USA over the mideast naturally..I still have a hard time seeing America as solely "the good guys". Some of their methods (and Carrie's methods) just don't always put them on the side of the angels.
There's hardly anyone left in Homeland that I pull for..The cost seem to outweigh the gains to me. And everyone seems miserable.
In TWD (a far inferior show, I know)misery is an even bigger selling point. Let's kill off as many major likable characters as possible and make the ones left as miserable as possible...and then lets write the characters that survive out of left field and untrue to what we know of them just to advance the plot. The characters we know no longer resemble the characters they were.. and not as growth of character
Both shows have just become pointless to me. They've killed so many people that I no longer care about the people that are left. But everyone has a different way of looking at things clearly..Or what their misery saturation point is and what causes them to feel that way.
Dark and gritty is the new thing and I do prefer it overall but I've come to require a payoff and ....hope.
the challenge to the viewer in this series, as i see it, is to take Elizabeth's role seriously. She is the one who is suffering the most, the most committed, the most brittle.
but without a person such as elizabeth, the missions would not have gotten done. phillip would have gone home long ago, or even defected. in a certain sense, he is both more and less believable. you can believe E when she slits a guys throat, but with P its more of a challenge, because he seems so much more emotionally normal. he no longer, and long since, fits his role as agent-in-place.
to the op - i think its worth sticking with - i have, consider it one of the greatest series ever made, right up there at the top.
> What do people who have watched this long-term think about it?
It's had its ups and downs, and its inconsistencies, but it's far better than 99% of what's on the tube.
> my impression from what I have is that it is not so violent, and there is two sides of every story, and every country does it against every other country.
The violence might have been there, but I think it's way overplayed. In real life both sides would wanna keep this stuff as low key as possible.
The sexual parts are very unrealistic. I'm not saying sexpionage doesn't happen, but the idea that otherwise sane adults are slaves to their gonads, and P & E can bed anyone they like just by donning the right fake hair, is crazy. On top of that, the human sexual response is just too idiosyncratic. People are drawn to different types, and if the target Liz pursues happens to be into zaftig women, what's she gonna do then? Sure, occasionally you'll have a Richard Patterson ("Covert War" episode) who'll jump on anything in a skirt, but then that's a tactic of opportunity. No sane agent would use sex as a default strategy; too many weird, unexpected, and uncontrollable things can happen.
Of course there's a reason for the sex and violence; as Ethel Merman said, "that's entertainment!"
Every country does it to every other? Sure. But every country has its frictions with every other country. Imposing economic sanctions is a huge move, and going to war is a titanic move. One of the purposes this kind of skullduggery serves is to provide nations a spectrum of actions they can take against each other short of actual warfare. Otherwise, the world's nations would be like individuals living in a society where, when two people had a dispute, their only two options were to do absolutely nothing or fire pistols at each other.
> a good guy like Stan Beeman
I suppose. But if he ever arrests you then offers you a cheeseburger, might be a good idea to turn it down ...
> But if he ever arrests you then offers you a cheeseburger, might be a good idea to turn it down ...
By that time i think it would be a little late.
From what I have been told working for corporations and military contractors, money is the biggest incentive though I think Russians have trained some women to be very good at sexual technique. I still don't think that it would get someone to betray their country or talk about work. Who wants to talk about work while they are having sex? That is why they don't give security clearances or put gamblers or people in debt in sensitive places.
One thing that plays down the hiding among civilians thing is that the situation like Elizabeth got herself in when she had to kill the old woman in the repair facility. If you are stuck and stable in a job with a family you are more likely to have to kill people, and you cannot run either. It seems like it would be a big problem. Easier to bring in contractors from somewhere else.
TV always portrays these fire-fights and murders all over the place, which it has to get the level of excitement they want with the bad and lazy writing they are willing to put up with, but it always bugs me see these shootouts in public. Who among us has ever heard of a shootout in public? I've lived in a lot of place and have not even heard of one, aside from the nuts that shoot up schools or their work.
That's why in general I don't take this show seriously, but it is kind of funny. Imagine that Phil could get this woman to marry him and she never knew he wore a wig, or if he wore on she never mentioned it.
So, I hope the last season will make it to Hulu or Amazon so I can finish it for the heck of it.
> From what I have been told [...] money is the biggest incentive
I've heard that the big four are money, ideology, coersion, and ego; which conveniently can be summed up with the acronym "MICE." John Walker and Christopher Boyce being prime examples of the first two.
Coersion apparently isn't that difficult. Befriend the target then ask for a tiny, "harmless" extra-legal favor -- and it's suprising how many will fall for it and believe it really is harmless. Then get a slightly bigger "favor" from him, then a bigger one, and soon the target is in way over his head and you own him.
Ego? I lived in DC for about a decade, and I gotta say it's got more than its share of people who are emotionally stuck in high school; maybe more than Hollywood. People who get off on having ridden in the same elevator with some Senator. And if the person's morbidly insecure, needing to self-aggrandize? I knew one such type who worked for NSA and never leaked any classified data, never broke the law. But being NSA was an ego thing with him, so he'd drop little innocent tidbits about things to make himself look big ... and from his blather my friends and I figured out about the hanky-panky with phone calls long before anyone had heard of Snowden. I'd think that type could be turned, just give him the admiration he thinks is his rightful due.
> it is kind of funny. Imagine that Phil could get this woman to marry him and she never knew he wore a wig, or if he wore on she never mentioned it.
The Martha story arc was funny for me, because it was so lacking in credibility. She's not only slept with P a hundred times, but is in love with him -- hey, forget the wig and glasses! I remember my first real love. You could have wrapped her in a burqa and I would have immediately known it was her by the way she walked, moved her hands, etc. Sooner or later Martha would be coincidentally in some Wendy's at the same time as P&E and pick up on who he was; DC isn't all that big, ya know ...
They really only touched on it with the show, but their training is trauma-based (at least with the women). It conditions them to dissociate so they can use sex as a tool to get information. Elizabeth was sexually traumatized by a ranking officer while she was in training. Red Sparrow is a whole movie about this type of training. When they are not outright raped, they are forced to have sex in front of everyone. There was definitely something going on with Philip too. I don't remember exactly, but I seem to recall an episode where Philip had flashbacks to when he was a kid living on the street. It was implied that there were men who take boys off of the street to do whatever with them. And then the episode where Elizabeth wanted Philip to do with her what he did with Martha.
> their training is trauma-based (at least with the women). It conditions them to dissociate so they can use sex as a tool to get information. Elizabeth was sexually traumatized by a ranking officer while she was in training.
I really got the impression that wasn't an "official" part of the training; but rather was an off-the-record perk some officers treated themselves to.
> There was definitely something going on with Philip too. I don't remember exactly, but I seem to recall an episode where Philip had flashbacks to when he was a kid living on the street.
Yeah, I remember that. At about age eleven, he killed (in self-defense) some pervert by clubbing him in the head with a rock, IIRC. The whole thing became an issue when Philip began confronting some of his inner demons at EST. But the show made it clear that in the years during and just after WWII, life in the USSR sucked at about 1500 PSI. I suppose, maybe, that the KGB picked up on some psychological trauma P had and decided that would be useful for his training ... but I think that's about as far as that connection can be taken, and I don't see anything that supports that idea, other than just our speculation.
Don't get me wrong. I'm sure their training was rough, and often brutal. The KGB wouldn't want people who would get frazzled under a little pressure, or who might break down after protracted stress, or who might crumple under questioning if captured. Better to weed out weaklings. And they'd consider the possibility that rape might be used as a torture tactic against their agents. So I'm not entirely discounting what you say.
> And then the episode where Elizabeth wanted Philip to do with her what he did with Martha.
That was just weird. He should have said to her, "you want me to make some lame excuse immediately after, run to the bathroom, and throw up?"
It shows the spy game as it truly is. As far as the KGB was concerned America, particularly under Reagan, was the enemy. They were at war with the American government and the killing of innocents who got caught in the crossfire (or discovered something they shouldn't have) was a regretful fact of life.
Not sure there is any evidence for that. Russia had a lot of reason to be paranoid and defensive when it comes to the US. They still do - we, the US, have been in an undeclared war with Russia since forever.
I watched it when it originally aired and did not think much about it. I've been sick over the last few weeks and have binged it heavily. I just finished the show today. I was stunned at how dark and depressing it was. I think having all those episodes back to back felt a lot different than watching one once a week, with life and other shows interspersed in-between. It was truly dark. With that said, it was a good show that had a great ending. I found it hard to sympathize with the "heroes" of the show, although at times I did sympathize with their plight.
SPOILERS BELOW.
I hated to see Phillip have to go back to Moscow, especially since he expressed a lot of love for the USA way of life. Even moreso, Oleg was a true hero, and he really got screwed in the end. I hated that.