MovieChat Forums > West of Memphis (2012) Discussion > So Jason 'could have walked free' if he ...

So Jason 'could have walked free' if he testified against Damien?


Another *beep* lie this movie propagates... Lol trying to make Jason out as a choir boy, they imply that back at the original trials, "he could have walked free" if he testified against Damien.. But he said "no, my mother raised me better than that..."

Just like they do with Damien's "alibi" regarding the girls on the phone: "I was on the phone with three girls at the times they say the mruders took place"! Uhhh, dude, no you weren't. They couldnt account for you from 6PM to almost 10PM.


AND, how they tried to make it look like Jessie had a receipt for wrestling the night of the murders.. Only.. yeah.. that was from the week prior...

FAILBOAT of a docudrama...

reply

[deleted]

I don't believe he would have been allowed to go free, in fact it seems downright impossible considering Damien was being prosecuted with the same confession that implicated him.

The film has lies in it, though why they don't stick with actual facts to exonerate the boys I don't know. The case doesn't need fabrications to prove their innocence, just common sense. Like if Jessie is smart enough to give inaccurate confessions to throw off the police (indicating a knowledge of deception), why was he not smart enough to realize they'd be able to tell the boys weren't killed in the morning, didn't skip school, had no semen in their mouths (from Damien and Jason's forced blow jobs), etc.? I mean the guy is smart enough to try to confuse the cops, yet not smart enough to realize bodily fluids can be tested or that school records can be consulted to see if the boys were in school? It makes no sense.

reply

They never said they would have let him go if he testified, just that he would have done far less time. probably less than ten with good behavior.. But as he said later, even if they let him go home that same day, he still would not have done it. It's worth pointing out that not only did he refuse to take the Alford plea at first, but his lawyer tried to get the prosecutor to only offer the plea agreement to just jessie and damian, that way jason at least could get to go to trial , but he straight up refused to do that too. Showing not only how sincere jason was, but how laughably weak the original case was. Scott Ellington wouldn't even retry just one of the three .

reply

Why would Ellington retry him if he can just get a guilty plea? You really think pretending to not wanna plead guilty before doing exactly that is some sort of honorable move? Lol

reply

How is it pretending when his lawyer tried to exclude him from the alford plea?? Get him to plead guilty (via an alford plea) and then release all of them so they could possibly murder more 8 year olds?? *facepalm*

reply

I think their days of murdering 8 year olds are behind them. No one knows what happened. You saying that you're 100% sure someone with no alibi and serious circumstantial evidence against them can only come from you liking them personally. The WM3 are the most serious suspects in this case.

Not that it means anything, but I think them boys is guilty. They shouldn't have done that... He was just a lil boy

reply