10 Questions for 'supporters' (Created by Fred Walsh)
Let me state that I hate the terms "supps," "nons," and "fencies" to describe the differing perspectives on the case; "fencie" is one who goes back and forth from guilty to innocent, one who is 50/50, or one who just can't make their mind up which way to lean... I just use them because it's how we all easily identify one's stance and feelings about the case.
Also I must state that these questions were created by long-time case researcher Fred J. Walsh. Fred is a "non," and has literally been following, and researching the case since practically day one back in 1993-1994. Seriously, he probably knows more about the case than anybody... So I guarantee all these questions are thoroughly researched, and fact-checked... But question the veracity of them, and fact-check them if you think there's a hole or error in them, and I'll address it, or ask Fred to!
Well, supporters (nons and fencies can partake too!) I look forward to starting a great debate!
1 - Why did Jessie maintain his guilt to his lawyer for 3 months, from arrest through the summer of 1993?
2 - Why did Jessie offer additional detailed confessional statements after conviction?
3 - Why did Damien/Jason's accounts change from when they were first interviewed by police only days after the crimes?
4 - Why did two of Damien's girl pals say that he was out that night with Jason, contrary to their own accounts? Why was one of the girls told that Damien wasn't home, when she tried to reach him by phone at 8/9 PM, a time he claims to have been at home?
5 - Why did the Hollingworth family insist they had seen Damien near the scene that night in muddy clothes?
6 - Why was Damien telling police that he and Domini were picked up from a laundromat before 3PM and then she was dropped home, at the same time Domini was telling the cops she had gotten dropped home at 7-7:30PM?
7 - Why did Jason's lawyer feel he couldn't field a proper alibi for Jason?
8 - Why did Jason's friend Ken say that he'd left Jason along with Damien behind at Wal-Mart after playing videogames that afternoon, when Jason claims Damien was not present and that it was he who left Ken at Wal-Mart? Ken's account places Jason and Damien together at 5:30PM, near the spot that Jessie claims to have met up with them, and only 1.25 miles west of the crime scene as the hour of the theorized times of the crimes approached.
9 - Why did Damien's (or Jason's) axe necklace have two different types of blood on it? One blood spot matched Jason/Steve Branch's types, and the other matched Damien's type.
10 - Why were three style of knots used in the tying of the victims?
BONUS 11 - Why was there blue candle wax found on Stevie Branch's shirt, and coincidentally a blue candle was found in Domini's bedroom, where Damien often stayed?
And some of my own questions:
12 - Why does Damien continue to say in post-release interviews that his alibi for the murders is "being on the phone with 4 girls," when in fact, we know that none of those four girls can account for him from the hours of approximately 6PM to 10PM?
13 - Why did Damien say on Larry King that he lived 20 miles away from where the murders took place, when in fact he lived closer than 2 miles?
14 - Why did Damien say on Larry King (and others) that he was not familiar with the neighborhood where the murders took place, when in fact he admitted before about constantly walking through the neighborhood? We know he loved to walk, and he was always seen (again, also by his own words) walking in, and around the area?
15 - Why does Damien, and his broad Lorrie continue to lie about the infamous "E-500 (Exhibit 500)" document? They claim it was created by some woman "out to get him," and it was only brought up by Jason's lawyers to attack him and make him look bad. When in fact, the documents were not "created" by any single person, but rather a compilation of various medical doctors, psychologists, correctional officers, social workers, etc. private records of Damien and their observations, notes, and recommendations regarding his mental health. One was even for him applying for social security benefits on account of being mentally ill. And, most importantly, these documents were introduced on the record by DAMIEN AND HIS LAWYERS during his sentencing phase (in hopes of saving his life). SO, WHY WOULD THEY MAKE THESE OUTRIGHT LIES UP?
This is just part one... There will be plenty more to come ;) I think all these questions can have an explanation, but to me, there's so many coincidences, and *beep* you find yourself having to "explain away"... IMO, it's just too much...