MovieChat Forums > Hacksaw Ridge (2016) Discussion > The worst film I've ever seen.

The worst film I've ever seen.


I don't say that lightly, but I saw nothing to secure an Oscar nomination, it should be in the Razzie awards. This wreaks of pro war propaganda. The Japanese were given no character. It was deplorable. Sorry, I never start posts on here.

reply

Come on, worst film you've seen? It's not great, but an ok 7/10 I guess.

reply

this^^

reply

As another poster said, it's not great, but a 7. I think the story of this man deserved to be told, and it could have made a great movie, but I think this is only a "good" one.
The things that I did not like:
- some really unbelievable scenes ( the sergeant shooting while being dragged...to name one )
- lack of realism in dialogue during battle
- some slow motion scenes
- the score
- slow beginning

Overall good movie, good acting, good battle sequences.
7/10 for me.




"Please, if you are trying to convert me, this isn't a good time"

reply

i agree with all your points and also a real lack of character development, other than the main character. Half the movie was graphic battle footage and all the men in the unit where thinly sketched caricatures. This man's story deserved to be told, but look at the nuance and subtlety in a good war movie like Platoon and how it is sorely lacking in this film.

That and the hammy, nonbelievable things in some of the battle scenes lost me. I thought many of the fireballs during the battle were overproduced and felt too much like an action movie rather than realistically harrowing. For me, it's a shame that this was nominated for Best Picture and Silence wasn't. That achieved things on a much more profound, mature level.

reply

It's funny how you think this is PRO-WAR propaganda when after watching it, it only solidified my personal anti-war stance.

reply

But, if you are anti-war, why enlist into the army in the first place like this guy did? He did it, as I understand it, out of religious reasons. Which is totally nuts IMO.

reply

He didn't do it for religious reasons, he did it because everyone in his town was going to war, so he felt like he wasn't really contributing to the cause by staying home.

reply

He didn't do it for religious reasons, he did it because everyone in his town was going to war, so he felt like he wasn't really contributing to the cause by staying home.

reply

he actually states that he takes Pearl Harbor personally...and he wants to help?

reply

But, if you are anti-war, why enlist into the army in the first place like this guy did? He did it, as I understand it, out of religious reasons. Which is totally nuts IMO.


This is the problem with people with the mindset of 2017 and our "enlighten" society.
I remember reading on the "Hateful Eight" board and someone actually said in the 1880's blacks were generally treated with respect and racism was rare in the north.

1940's culture was so dynamically different than today's standard. If you were an able bodied grown man, it was your DUTY to sign up for the war effort.

You have to remember, American were attacked on their home soil by an invading army for the first time in almost 150 years and people were fricking SCARED and PISSED!

Just imagine if a sovereign nation was behind the 9/11 attack and that nation flat out said, "Yeah, b&tch and that's just for starters!!!!" Plus you were shown EVERYDAY the people of that nation cheering and chanting about coming to our shores and killing us.
That what the young teenage/20 something in the 1940's was exposed to on a daily basis via movie reels before every movie in theater or TV. (I can remember cartoons being played before every movie, man I'm old!)

Doss said it himself, when Pearl Harbor was attacked, it was personal. He didn't want to kill, but he had to do SOMETHING.

reply

It's funny how you think this is PRO-WAR propaganda when after watching it, it only solidified my personal anti-war stance.

Personally I thought it glorified war even though it preached against violence. That guy was indeed more courageous than anyone hiding behind a gun and his story is a good one to be told.

Still, the movie uses all the clichés of typical war movies. The enemy is an inhuman and dehumanized villain, even called the Devil.
The heart warming brotherhood of dudes. Again, only on the side of angels.
And the whole movie is based around heroism in battle.

War makes no heroes, only victims.

For every lie I unlearn I learn something new - Ani Difranco

reply

I don't know, it just made me frustrated that an incredible true story can be turned into a Mel Gibson film with slow motion slapping grenades out of the air.

It was also the least gritty war film, far too polished. Vince Vaughn cracking jokes was probably the best part and that was terrible if you imagine that sort of actong delivery in the great war films. "We're not in Kansas anymore Dorothy" *shudder*

I honestly don't think I've seen a more tired boring generic film ever. It did absolutely nothing new.

Like I say, sorry, it's not my usual stance. I can see the good in most films but I got nothing out of this but an anxiety that an all white film this bad can get 6 Oscar nominations.

reply

slapping grenades out of the air.


you know the stuff he did in this movie (exagerated as it seems) actually happened.

Best Youtube Page You're Not Following
http://tinyurl.com/zv98qwh

reply

Vince Vaughn cracking jokes was probably the best part and that was terrible if you imagine that sort of actong delivery in the great war films. "We're not in Kansas anymore Dorothy" *shudder*


Totally agree, it was corny and cringe worthy, Mel stole from every other war film, and don't forget the first half of "gee-golly" PG romance, what ever happened to great mature home front scenes like Deer Hunter?
HRS didn't even have a single swear word in the whole pic, not quite WWII grunt realism.

This won't win any Oscars any sane person can see that.

reply

and this^^

reply

You clearly haven't watched many films then. Go watch Birdemic, then claim this is "the worst film" you've seen.

reply

Hacksaw Ridge is one of the worst films this year. Silence should have replaced it for Best Picture, Best Actor, and Best Director.

reply

Well, when the Japanese make a film about one of their own soldiers, that refused to kill due to his religious beliefs and saved lives instead, then perhaps you might get the Japanese character development you so desperately wish for.

Don't eat the whole ones!...Those are for the guests. 🍪

reply

it would be hard to make a film about a guy with no head.

reply

i'm guessing you haven't seen Jaws: The Revenge







so many movies, so little time

reply

Kind of surprising after taking a quick view of movies you’ve rated, as I agree with a lot of them, Hacksaw Ridge is the cinematic tale of one outstandingly brave war hero, so a Japanese view point wouldn’t of fit in with this story.

Maybe it should have been called Hacksaw Ridge – The Story of Desmond Doss to get that point across, sorry you didn’t enjoy it, but this man truly deserved a movie of his own and I’m glad it was made.

reply

Wouldn't have fit. There is no such thing as "wouldn't of". You're welcome. :)

reply

Kind of surprising after taking a quick view of movies you’ve rated, as I agree with a lot of them, Hacksaw Ridge is the cinematic tale of one outstandingly brave war hero, so a Japanese view point wouldn’t of fit in with this story.

Maybe it should have been called Hacksaw Ridge – The Story of Desmond Doss to get that point across, sorry you didn’t enjoy it, but this man truly deserved a movie of his own and I’m glad it was made.

Agreed. This is Doss's story. and it deserved to be told. I liked the movie myself.

reply

Obviously not American.

A ship sank at the end of the movie Titanic!

reply