A modern version of Taxi Driver with no redemption
I thought this was a similar film to Taxi Driver, without a redemptive ending - the main character just insanely wallowed in his impotency... I thought the film was fantastic. Your thoughts?
shareI thought this was a similar film to Taxi Driver, without a redemptive ending - the main character just insanely wallowed in his impotency... I thought the film was fantastic. Your thoughts?
shareI thought Observe and Report was the modern day Taxi Driver?
shareThe final scene where he's playing with the kid on the beach wasn't supposed to represent a kind of hope for redemption?
shareI thought the last scene was a sort of redemption as well. It's also the first time he interacts with a child, though, but he's a giant selfish child so I'm not sure how much redemption there is
shareI took it as more of a juxtaposition to show how he didn't want to stop playing childishly even when the kid wanted to walk away... I don't know it seems like there are multiple interpretations haha
shareI took it as more of a juxtaposition to show how he didn't want to stop playing childishly even when the kid wanted to walk away... I don't know it seems like there are multiple interpretations haha
I wouldn't really compare this film to Taxi Driver in any particular way, but yes I agree -- there is no real "redemption" at the end for Swanson. I don't see how playing with a kid makes him suddenly better. He's shown hints of glee and fun throughout the film -- fun at belittling others and generally being an *beep* He's not a total sociopath maybe, and shows some compassion or regret when alone it seems (i.e. hospital scene before nurse walks in)... but when other people enter the picture he always regresses back to immature cruelty. There's nothing about having a playful water-splash battle that breaks this pattern of behavior; what did you expect him to do, shoot the kid?
For what it is, it's a pretty great little film. It has more to say than, say, THE MASTER, a lauded and gorgeously-dressed but ultimately somewhat empty film. I'm not saying it's at all a masterpiece, but it's a very effective dissection of an era and a certain subgroup of people, and I think the critics really dropped the ball on this one (one well-known critic even casually dismissed it as just another dumb "funny fat guy" comedy; I mean.. what?) Watch the same critics then praise the next Judd Apatow movie, which asks the audience to empathize with and support sociopathic man-children just like Swanson. This movie is meant to be an expose of that kind of disgusting, "hilarious" behavior so often exhibited in movies like Apatow's. A wake-up call to take off the mask of "irony" and perpetual jokiness that conceals true feeling and sincerity; a bigger problem than ever in our culture today. For that alone, it's an admirable work, if a little unsubtle and not exactly easy to sit through. It's surprisingly well-shot, too. Notice how most of the film's in unusually shallow focus, emphasizing Swanson's solipsism and obliviousness to the surrounding world.
He's not better, per se, but it does seem to imply that he has a chance at connecting with someone and not being an *beep* You can see throughout the movie he wants to feel something for someone, but he has no real idea how to relate to people. It's not cure, but it's a start at being something other than the selfish person he's been his entire life, who he obviously hates.
We don't have to think in those terms anymore.
LOL, completely concur with your post!
share[deleted]