MovieChat Forums > The Comedy (2012) Discussion > Could someone explain the ending?

Could someone explain the ending?


I recently watched and loved The Comedy. For the most part I understood the film. I know that The Comedy is almost anti-plot yet I need someone to explain the ending of the film. He rides up to that beach and starts messing with that little kid. Soon, the screen goes black and I think I heard the kid scream. I just don't fully understand what the ending was about. i haven't rewatched it but the ending just kind of had me clueless.If someone could explain it, it would be great.

reply

I saw Swanson as a guy who perpetually sought out some form of stimulus, regardless of what it was. I think he wants to get a rise out of people in order to feel like he's making some sort of impact; that he has some sort of purpose. In many ways this is childlike behavior through the lens of adulthood. Children are curious beings who seek out stimulation. I think the last scene is there to illustrate how similar these two are, and honestly it seemed like the most fun the protagonist had had throughout the entire film.

I think it's also important to note that there's nothing ironic or sarcastic in their interactions. There's a purity there that's at once uplifting and heartbreaking.

I think there's been a rape up there!

reply

[deleted]

i thought it might have been his kid, maybe in the future. If this is a really dark comedy, i see it as life is pointless, and people have kids just to make themselves better and as sweet as it might appear here, its all devastation, this is his last hope

reply

[deleted]

No, it wasn't a random kid! That's HIS KID!

reply

[deleted]

I'm guessing you aren't a parent, but a random parent isn't going to let their little boy go play with some random person on the beach. Plus, a child generally will shy away from a complete stranger.

So, you said the film doesn't give any reason to think that. Why not? Did he not have sex with the girl? This is plenty of reason to think it's his son, and not a completely random child on the beach.

So, why did he pick this girl with the epileptic for the mother of his child? People complain he seems heartless when she has an episode. Well, he is kind of heartless.

But he knows his mind has an over-active imagination with little contraints. He knows if he passes this trait to his son, he might be able to put an end to wildness. Or, perhaps he's just being a jerk. Or, perhaps he wants to be the father he never had.

We really never know... but the family continues...

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I think it shows that really he hasn't grown forward from that point as a kid.
and not in a good way.

reply

Well, one of the underlying themes of the movie is that Swanson and his friends don't want to grow up - they want to stay kids forever, have no responsibilities and just play all the time.

reply

That's exactly what the ending is about. It's saying he's gone no where, and is basically a 35 year old boy (or however old he is). All the intelligence he has was never put to anything of use. Not furthering his mind. Not having any thoughts, ambitions or beliefs of his own. Just making fun of those who do. His "intelligence" was used only to make pseudo-clever comments to make his pals laugh, humiliate others in situations that are of seriousness for them (a nurse in his profession, people praying in a church, a cab driver trying to make a living), and to get women to have sex with him.

I guess this is a commentary on people who grow up with absent parents who give them a bunch of money and educate them through private schools. They give their children the best of everything but themselves. Then, as depicted in the movie, the kids use all the cleverness they possess to make cheap laughs, and talk about world issues they know nothing about like they are enlightened. They have no emotional attachment to anything and damage their bodies with drugs because subconsciously they hate themselves. On the other hand, consciously, believe they are above others because everything in the material world they have been given indicates they are above.

An interesting scene is when the girl was having a seizure. They guy looked at her like he didn't care whatsoever. So essentially sex has no emotional or spiritual attachment in any way shape or form. And when he's sitting with his father, while he is on his death bed, unconscious, he prods at him like a little kid messing with a sleeping animal, showing he has no emotional connection to his father. Everything is physical and material for the main character, and anything with any emotional, or intuitive (right brained) content is basically laughed at like it's a big joke.

A great scene was when the guy was talking about being with the only family he has, and how his parents died, and was an orphan. Then someone makes a quick joke about and they toast and completely dismiss it. Instead, of people who being mature and trying to learn about themselves, their minds, and others, exploring that subject matter that is so taboo to them, because it's emotionally charged, and *beep* real. So, we'd better avoid that and continue being 35 year old children by drinking and jumping around in our underwear.

reply

He raped him at the end. It was foreshadowed earlier in the film when he said that he's a convicted rapist.

reply

I think the convicted rapist bit was just another example of his callousness, and the scene shows how attractive that attitude can be to a certain type of woman.

I was initially confused by the ending, but now I agree that it is about him being a child. I guess I was hoping for a better ending -maybe an ending where something changes, or something shocking happens- but this was just one of those endings that confirms everything you've already seen, with no surprises whatsoever.

"Under strengths... You just put 'Accounts.' That's just your job." ~David Brent, The Office

reply

I also see Swanson as a childlike character who's innocence is long-lost.

Tim Heidecker is so good in this.

reply

I think the film took inspiration from the works of J D Salinger; there are parallels with Catcher In The Rye in the general theme. At the end of one of Salinger's short stories, A Perfect Day For Bananafish, the main character, an adult who has become disillusioned with the world around him, finds some escape in play on the beach with a young child. I wonder if this was the inspiration for the final scene.

reply

My thought is that after all the douchiness, the "friends" who weren't really friends and the family who he disrespected (his bro in the 'looney bin', his s-I-l who he tried to provoke/seduce and chickened out, his father who he didn't care about to the point of physically poking his forehead and verbally abusing his nurse) people he encountered and treated like momentary distractions without a care for their dignity (cabbies, bartenders, etc.).

But at the end, he ran down to the beach and connected with a toddler running back-and-forth from the waves and splashing in the water and sand. He wasn't hostile or ironic or cutting, from what I could see. It seemed completely out of character after the first 80 minutes, and I wonder if this was supposed to demonstrate a 'potential for change' or catharsis for his character. In any event, if you have ever run into those kinds of cruel sarcastic people who use truth as a weapon and enjoy frustrating/provoking/taunting people, you will know that they are chilling to be around and don't have any incentive to change until they get their ass kicked or need something material.

reply

Immediately after watching the ending, I thought the sudden cut-away, as he's approaching the child , was somehow symbolic. As if you are meant to decide what happens next.

And judging by how he mistreated nearly everyone he came in contact with and seemed to posess no empathy for human beings, he could have messed with or tormented the kid in some way (like he did EVERYONE else), or just played innocently.

This is what I thought they were leaving open to interpretation.

I don't know if this holds any weight, or not.


---
in the beginning, it is always dark

reply