Just hear me out, feel free to disagree. Its OK to have opinion guys....
I didnt hate it, in fact i LIKED IT. I personally give it a 6 or even a 7/10, and i quite appreciated how it makes understanding emotions easy for kids.
But to me its not even close to the greats like Incredibles, Wall-E or Grave of the Fireflies. Those films were great for kids and adults, and had mature and deeper themes when you dug beneath the movies surface.
With Inside out, i found it so shockingly basic. I expected a lot more to be going on under the surface but really what you see is what you get. For the all crap Inception gets for not being subtle and being literal with dreams, Inside out's "characters" are all caricatures. Their development is SOOO predictable, from Sadness understanding Joy, and Joy understanding sadness vice versa, the film had no surprises for me at all. Worse still, it ticked every generic box.
A cheerful character that has that sad Pixar moment
Life lesson plot
Side characters for comedy
And personally, they did not develop riley enough. The emotions in her head felt separate from her as a person. Almost as if they were just puppeteering her. At the end of the day, its not a BAD movie to me, but a sorely dissapointing one that i think, critics embraced simply because it was Pixars better movies for a long time.
By the end of the film, i didnt get to know Riley as a person, and character arcs were extremely predictable
I loved the trailer, and i still think this could have made for a great short, but as a full blown movie, the middle act is pure padding and the conclusion is generic. I saw it coming a mile away, so it didnt hit me at all.
So why do people defend this movie so vehemently? I know quite a number of people who dont like the film either, but the defenders treat it like the second coming of Pixars golden age. And god forbid anyone who has an opinion otherwise.
The argument i get is always that "You just didnt understand the film".
In my humble opinion i understood it. It just felt much more shallow than i expected.
I have not seen the film since 2015 though, and i'll wondering if i should revisit it. Again, as negative as i probably sound, i still LIKED the film! Especially the soundtrack. So despite being generic and predictable i still felt emotional at certain points.
While there may be others who could respond to this better, I'm not sure those users post here anymore, so I'll have to do it. Okay, here goes and I like to do this with a break down style.
Its OK to have opinion guys....
Of course, no one would dispute that.
I didnt hate it, in fact i LIKED IT. I personally give it a 6 or even a 7/10, and i quite appreciated how it makes understanding emotions easy for kids.
A 6 or 7 sounds low to me, but maybe that's just a difference in our grading scales. Of course, I can't really compare our scales because when I checked your ratings history, I saw mostly 1s and 10s.
But to me its not even close to the greats like Incredibles, Wall-E or Grave of the Fireflies. Those films were great for kids and adults, and had mature and deeper themes when you dug beneath the movies surface.
I'm not going to argue films against each other, so I'll just say that Inside Out can easily compete with those films on the deep analysis level.
With Inside out, i found it so shockingly basic. I expected a lot more to be going on under the surface but really what you see is what you get. For the all crap Inception gets for not being subtle and being literal with dreams, Inside out's "characters" are all caricatures. Their development is SOOO predictable, from Sadness understanding Joy, and Joy understanding sadness vice versa, the film had no surprises for me at all. Worse still, it ticked every generic box.
I felt this film was too detailed and written too flawlessly to call basic. I've heard others claim it doesn't stand up to a deep analysis and I proved them wrong every time. As for predictability, while most films will usually have a degree of that, this one wasn't overly so. It wasn't Big Hero 6 for example. And lastly,even if a film uses some common conventions, it's the execution of them that matters most and this film delivered fully on that front.
A cheerful character that has that sad Pixar moment
Life lesson plot
Side characters for comedy
The last two are par for the course for mainstream animated films. It's in Pixar's contract, you can't fault them too much for it. The first one I feel is an unfair myth associated with Pixar films given how many different executions each film has had.
And personally, they did not develop riley enough. The emotions in her head felt separate from her as a person. Almost as if they were just puppeteering her. At the end of the day, its not a BAD movie to me, but a sorely dissapointing one that i think, critics embraced simply because it was Pixars better movies for a long time.
This is something that has divided a lot of viewers. I've found that those who see the "puppet theory" tend to view the film more harshly. I viewed it in the perfect metaphorical sense and it worked fabulously in that method. I don't know how to get one side to see the other as films are open to multiple interpretations and neither of us can technically be said to be wrong. Still though, I think the metaphorical approach is what the film makers were going for.
By the end of the film, i didnt get to know Riley as a person, and character arcs were extremely predictable
The whole film is about Riley's character, even if it's on a somewhat basic level. But there's beauty in simplicity and a lot of times it's the art with the simplest approaches that get off the deepest messages.
I loved the trailer, and i still think this could have made for a great short, but as a full blown movie, the middle act is pure padding and the conclusion is generic. I saw it coming a mile away, so it didnt hit me at all.
The film worked perfectly as a full movie and I never felt there was anything unnecessary put in. And if you saw the ending coming a mile away, it seems like you were spending too much time overthinking and not letting the movie breathe naturally.
So why do people defend this movie so vehemently? I know quite a number of people who dont like the film either, but the defenders treat it like the second coming of Pixars golden age. And god forbid anyone who has an opinion otherwise.
First off, the Pixar "Golden Age" is a myth. Like any other company, they have films that will appeal to different people and the idea that they once only created perfect masterpieces that pleased everyone is ludicrous. As the fans of this film, Inside Out got attacked by trolls and haters almost as vehemently as Frozen. It's one thing to have disagreements, it's another thing to be outright malicious to a film like so many were.
The argument i get is always that "You just didnt understand the film".
In my humble opinion i understood it. It just felt much more shallow than i expected.
Yeah, I don't like that argument either. Still, just because you found it shallow doesn't mean others did. Also, as I said above, different interpretations exist so there is no one way to understand a film.
I have not seen the film since 2015 though, and i'll wondering if i should revisit it. Again, as negative as i probably sound, i still LIKED the film! Especially the soundtrack. So despite being generic and predictable i still felt emotional at certain points.
I hope you do revisit the film, it's quite wonderful. Maybe next time just let it breath and take it in. I'm also glad you like the score, it's one of Pixar's best imo. I didn't think the film was generic and predictable, many others didn't, but if that's how you feel I won't stop you.
"If life is getting you down and needs uplifting, then please come dance with me!"
reply share
Yea i agree that i might have been overthinking a tad too much going into this movie. After hearing the unanimous praise that it was a masterpiece and all that, i came in expecting to be blown away.
I want to love this film so bad but i just wish the characters (emotions) were more developed? Either way those key emotional moments still stick with me, so its a film i will definitely revisit eventually. And i should probably also note, Ratatouille was a film i found overrated when it was released, but revisiting that movie years later, i couldn't believe how wrong i was haha, so maybe expectations played a role here.
Hope its better the second time around! The score IS INCREDIBLE though :)
The first post that makes sense to me. I feel people are way too quick to hand out 1s or 10s. This film was neither. Even crappy movies deserve some points for decent filming, lighting, actors, etc. And even films we personally love aren't always perfect.
As for this movie, I felt like it is not a bad movie, but I expected something different. My rating would be close to yours at around 6-7. Why? Because this movie could have been more. The idea wasn't bad, but the execution of it seemed a bit lackluster. It is a movie one can watch, but a masterpiece? There are very few of those. I think I personally only rated 3 or 4 movies with a 10. And I think long and hard before I do. People who rate this(or other movies they just personally love, despite all flaws) 10 insult the real masterpieces, such as Heat or L.A. Confidential for example. Pixar must have paid a lot of money to movie critics to get such a high rating. Compare it to "The Predator" for example that is considered a cult classic by many. Its rating is much, much lower. But then again, Deadpool is one of the highest rated movies on imdb...
The first post that makes sense to me. I feel people are way too quick to hand out 1s or 10s. This film was neither. Even crappy movies deserve some points for decent filming, lighting, actors, etc. And even films we personally love aren't always perfect.
The ironic thing about this is that the OP actually had tons of 1s and 10s in their ratings history so they obviously aren't with you here. Personally I've never given any film a 1 and I don't exactly hand out 10s like candy, but people's methods are ratings are their own I guess.
Now I've already given a breakdown on the OP's thoughts on Inside Out and opinions in general in my post above, but there are some other points in your post that need addressing.
People who rate this(or other movies they just personally love, despite all flaws) 10 insult the real masterpieces, such as Heat or L.A. Confidential for example.
No, people giving movies like Inside Out exceptional ratings is not an insult to any other film. In fact, this line right here basically equates to a "my movies and my opinions are better than yours" stance. At the end of the day, what films are considered the greatest masterpieces will be up to each individual, there are no overall right or wrong answers. People are not wrong for thinking Inside Out is a masterpiece just as you are not wrong for thinking it's not.
Pixar must have paid a lot of money to movie critics to get such a high rating.
Really, this is not worth a serious response so...
Compare it to "The Predator" for example that is considered a cult classic by many. Its rating is much, much lower. But then again, Deadpool is one of the highest rated movies on imdb...
None of this has anything to do with anything. People can argue all day that certain films should be rated higher, some should be lower, but either way people shouldn't take much stock on arbitrary numbers on websites.
"If life is getting you down and needs uplifting, then please come dance with me!"
reply share
I think I personally only rated 3 or 4 movies with a 10. And I think long and hard before I do.
Really? You thought hard about that and you're still not sure how many you gave?
Compare it to "The Predator" for example that is considered a cult classic by many. Its rating is much, much lower. But then again, Deadpool is one of the highest rated movies on imdb...
but again how having a 0.4 difference between the two (Inside Out 8.2, Predator 7.8) is "much much lower"?
The problem with your argument anyway is what you consider a "masterpiece" is probably stuck in a certain genre (probably realistic and dramatic) and only based on what you like, not on what is good, and you're probably lacking the ability to discerne those elements and explain why they make a good movie in any case.
As for insulting anything for giving a good rating... Well, I don't know about that, but your post is surely an insult to basic argumentation. Up to using the lowest of argument that of course "critics are being paid for giving good ratings", which has never made any sense as far as movies are concerned (too many critics, too many ways to be informed, too many countries to take into account). Comparing it to the predator is also one of the dumbest thing I've read out here, since they have absolutely zero themes, scenes, setting, genre or anything in common.
reply share
Btw, a real animation masterpiece and basically a flawless movie would be "Princess Mononoke"!
Once again, this is merely a "my movie is better than yours" stance and is not in any way a provable fact. Also, using the word "real" to make a piece of art seem better than another is rather arrogant and condescending.
"If life is getting you down and needs uplifting, then please come dance with me!"
reply share