Many of the things in this movie is stretching to say at least to try and find any meaning behind it. But the seven dwarf sticker of Dopey I found very interesting because no way that was a continuity error because it was the only sticker missing and it was the most notable one. Anyone agree?
No. I don't think Kubrick was the type of film maker who would have continuity errors. He was a very detailed and thorough director. That is not to say that I think all the symbolism they talk about in this film is correct. Just that he does things deliberately. Even lining up the dissolves is deliberate but I've noticed a lot of film makers do that.
I can say with 99 percent certainty that this is what happened: The scene in Danny's bedroom with the doctor was filmed before the steadicam shot of Danny in the bathroom. When it came time to film the bathroom scene, someone, either Kubrick or the cinematographer realized that the decorations on the door ran out too quickly in the shot and hastily called the prop department to have them add another sticker to the door.
Agreed. There's no reason for the sticker not to have been there unless it was removed intentionally.
I disagree. I think many people here (including the film makers) are proceeding from a false POV that this scene was shot sequentially. For all we know, they shot the scene in the bedroom first, and the hallways SECOND. That puts a little kink in the filmmakers deductions.
All this could have been was a set decorator putting the Dopey sticker on AFTER shooting the bedroom scene, and then shooting the hallway scene next.
Kubrick was NOTORIOUS for re-shooting shots day after day after day. Each time you do that, you are BEGGING for continuity errors. Kubrick, while a genius, was not infallible.
Someone else said it best - Continuity errors are NOT art.
- - - Life is simple. We are the ones who make it complicated. reply share
Completely agree. But I don't buy the tracking shot theory. There is NO WAY they'd add content to the door knowing it had already been 'seen' the other way. (I'm using 'seen' in the showbiz sense - something that has already been captured on film that has been designated for printing and therefore could end up in the final film.)
Kubrick did it. He did it on purpose. It was a clever little trick. I think the more important discussion is, do these things really have an impact? Does removing Dopey give any viewer a more heightened sense of the importance of Danny's vision than the vision footage itself?
reply share