I am just wondering. Wouldn't it be better to make clones of the bees instead of robots if the bees are going extinct?
And did the A.I. bees kill their victims with their stings? If so, in case of an emergency, wouldn' it be better to remove the sting when making the A.I. bees in the first place so they can't kill humans?
I am just wondering. Wouldn't it be better to make clones of the bees instead of robots if the bees are going extinct?Sometimes the 'better' choice isn't always the one that's done. Solar/Wind/Nuclear/Oil...etc, and they did say in the episode that the government funded it by billions (to get the extra method of surveillance) they could've funded bee bio-cloning instead, but what benefit would the government get from it?Plus the bees self replicated through 3d printers in the hives. So it'd be the fastest way to solve the problem for sure, once the concept bee was designed and the code was working Koalas are telepathic. Plus, they control the weather. share
I see your point there.
shareI didn't get the self-replication thing. 3-D printers to create metal, plastic, power supplies, cameras with interfaces to face-recognition databases, sat nav etc. etc. All within a dodgy-looking plastic hive?
sharehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspension_of_disbelief Koalas are telepathic. Plus, they control the weather.
shareAsking someone to suspend disbelief, is all well and good - I'm pretty good at doing it - in most circumstances. But, this is obviously set in the near future. There was no need for this 'suspension of disbelief'.
When a bee 'goes down', there could have been back-up storage facilities with programmable bees, which could join hives. Simple! No need for the b0ll0cks. I didn't even mention that bees haven't got opposable thumbs!