One word..........
Masterpiece!
share[deleted]
Non-judgemental
_____________
I am the Queen of Snark, TStopped said so. And I have groupies, Atomic Girl said so.
Fictitious.
shareEntertaining
_____________
I am the Queen of Snark, TStopped said so. And I have groupies, Atomic Girl said so.
I don't think a story like this should be changed from fact into fiction just for the goal of entertaining people.
shareIt's history. history always gets changed. Every single historical movie is a piece of fiction because the film crew was not there to film the actual happenings. It's close enough to what happened to get people to look Turing up and read the facts about his life.
_____________
I am the Queen of Snark, TStopped said so. And I have groupies, Atomic Girl said so.
That may be true for a few people (like you and me) but I think you drastically overestimate our society. People do not read (I don't know where you are from but I'm from the US). About as far as most people get are books like the Hunger Games, Twilight, and 50 shades (most of which are written at a elementary reading level).
shareI can't comment on Twilight or that stupid 50 Shades book but The Hunger Games is an extremely well written set of novels that covers adult materiel in a very intelligent manner. If you haven't read them, you should. The story is excellent. I don't like accusing entire populations of a country as being too lazy to read. I check the book sales numbers and I know that Americans both buy books and read them. Also I don't group books into school levels. A book is either well written or it is not. A good children's book is a good book.
I don't know if I am any more intelligent than the next person, but thank you for the compliment. Even if you did link our intelligence level as being the same.
_____________
I am the Queen of Snark, TStopped said so. And I have groupies, Atomic Girl said so.
People do not read...in the US
There is a hard core of dedicated readers (I count myself among them) but book readership has declined over the last few decades.
Here's an article from Atlantic about it:
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/01/the-decline-of-the-american-book-lover/283222/
And hard date from a recent Pew Research study:
http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/01/16/a-snapshot-of-reading-in-america-in-2013/
While most people still read books, they read fewer than in earlier decades, and some use e-readers in place of hard copies (I find e-readers impossible to read for long stretches, so I only use mine for travelling and some research-type volumes).
I kept a book list for many years, and while I averaged over 200 books annually(mostly fairly heavy-duty nonfiction), in the last decade it has dropped to more like 75 as I do read online, but mostly magazines, professional journals and news items.
There's danger, however, that too much online reading can adversely affect our ability to sustain attention and comprehension to difficult text. Here's a Huffington Post article about that:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/30/shocking-ways-internet-rewires-brain_n_4136942.html
While the book referred to is a popular science work, serious cognitive science scholars are finding similar results, see for instance the work of Maryanne Wolf from Yale.
I invested in a Nook a year ago. Since then, I've read five Heinlein novels, two by Poul Anderson, one by Twain, the first five Ian Fleming Bond novels, Levon Helm's autobiography, and am now working my way through the Jack Ryan books in chronological order (almost done with Cardinal of the Kremlin). I left out a half-dozen or so works on non-fiction.
The Nook (the basic black and white one with backlight, which runs for weeks on a charge) has taken a steady reader and turned him into an obsessive one. :-)
That being said, I need to track down Turing's bio.
Thats the purpose of movies.
------------------------------------------------
The spirit of abysmal despair
Enjoyable.
It isn't a documentary.
"Can you keep a secret? Can you know something and never speak of it again?"
Excellent.
share[deleted]
Those are four words.
shareThis thing... Why do I keep reading this? Is the lack of gay sex really something that had a negative effect for you?
I'd prefer to watch the beautiful and somehow tragic love story between young Alan Turing and Christopher than a scene where Alan Turing pay some guy for sex. Not because I'm homophobic or anything, but I believe that was just perfect for the overall tone of the film.
It would seem that the fact that Alan Turing was gay is something some people find either offensive or prurient. Some do want it confirmed with a gay love scene. Go figure, nothing Alan Truing did in his bedroom affected his important and crucial work at Bletchley Park. And it had nothing to do with his work afterwards.
_____________
I am the Queen of Snark, TStopped said so. And I have groupies, Atomic Girl said so.