MovieChat Forums > Perry Mason (2020) Discussion > should it not be set in the 1950s?

should it not be set in the 1950s?


or 1960s?

reply

Perry Mason debuted in print in 1933. The real question is should he not be a lawyer?

reply

From what I've read, the series will show him becoming an attorney.

reply

The books do mention he was a detective before he became an attorney. S1E6 is supposed to show us him in a courtroom. Not sure in what capacity.

reply

I've read quite a few Perry Mason novels, and I don't remember any reference to him being a detective. I just checked the wiki and it doesn't appear neither.

Maybe you're confusing with the Cool and Lam series, from the same author and with the main character being a detective?

reply

Which books mention this?

reply

" S1E6 is supposed to show us him in a courtroom." Unless Mason graduates law school and passes the bar by the end of the 5th episode we can assume he will not be a lawyer.

reply

At that time...he could probably become a barred attorney without graduating law school.

reply

During the 30s? I don't think so. That stopped happening in the XIXth century.

reply

That’s not true at all Kukuxu....during the first half of the century in California, he definitely could have “read the law” under the direction of a judge or attorney and then sat for the bar.

reply

Ok, then this -
"S1E6 is supposed to show us him in a courtroom." Unless Mason passes the bar by the end of the 5th episode we can assume he will not be a lawyer.

reply

Law school, is still not required in California, but he would still need some type of apprenticeship.

Current requirements

California
Study in a law office for four years under the supervision of an attorney with at least five years of active law practice in California. The study must involve 18 hours per week, with five hours directly supervised, in addition to monthly exams and bi-annual progress reports submitted to the California State Bar.

reply

Well, imdb's synposis of the show says "In booming 1932 Los Angeles, a down-and-out defense attorney takes on the case of a lifetime."
Assuming this is accurate, it could mean that he used to work as an attorney but stopped practicing law for whatever reason and ended up scraping by as a detective, and now he is going to make his way back to being a practicing attorney.

reply

I see that now. Thanks

reply

No problem.

reply

Why? The character appeared in print starting in the 1930s. And this is supposed to go back to the literary roots, instead of being a rehash of the popular TV version.

reply

point taken. should he not be a lawyer?

reply

This show is like "Perry Mason Begins." By the time this series ends, he will be entering into the familiar role as an attorney.

reply

Do you have a link from a credible source for this claim? I may have missed that in the articles I have read.

reply

He spent much of his time doing detective work anyway so this feels like a natural fit to me.

reply