MovieChat Forums > The Last Exorcism Part II (2013) Discussion > How?..

How?..

posted 12 years ago by azizam16
10 replies | jump to latest

Ok the first one was *beep* how is there a sequel?

[–] ModernHorror 12 years ago

Uhh, because the first film was very successful and made like 30 times its production budget at the box office.

The time we had together, we stole.

[–] azizam16 12 years ago

Oh i see. I'm just surprised cause it was terrible to me.

[–] 12 years ago

[deleted]

[–] swaderthanyoufilms 12 years ago

No one cares Gary. So GTFO

[–] jayehawk 12 years ago

The bigger question is if the first one was the Last Exorcism, how can their be another exorcism? Damn circular logic.

[–] 12 years ago

[deleted]

[–] jayehawk 12 years ago

Dude - I was only kidding. But thanks for trying anyways.
Kind of like how they kept making more of the Neverending Story. If it really never ended then they should not have been able to make new ones. You dig?

[–] deadbodieseverywhere17 12 years ago

I thought it was the best exorcism movie I saw in a long time. Possibly the best actually. So I'm not surprised.

"They're all dead.....they just don't know it yet." - Eric Draven

[–] hawaiianidol27 12 years ago

Like many horror movies that more than their original production cost, they order another film if there was material missed from the first movie. The first movie was choppy, but ok, and this version, my review to be posted on my website shortly will answer that question in full. Was the second go around better than the first? This time around I will answer in seven words: IT SURPRISED THE HELL OUT OF ME.

[–] 12 years ago

[deleted]