CGI...


Just what this movie didn't need. Those bloody Kangaroos looked terrible. Scene ruined the whole film for me. Should have left it right out.

reply

I watched it last night and thought it was cool. You know cgi bashing is getting old. So did you do the same bashing with 99% of the old monster flicks.

So glad they didn't use real Roos. However you'd still complain.

reply

It reminded me of Jumanji, and not in a good way.

Mr. Laurio, never trust a beautiful woman. Especially one who's interested in you.

reply

I completely agree with the OP. It was really stupid and served no purpose except unintentional humor.

reply

And it wasn't even funny, nor would it be. Animal cruelty is not funny, even when it is fake.

reply

[deleted]

Aww, look at you, trying to be all badass and provocative. Aren't you a cutiepie.

reply

I'm glad you approve! Are you into animal cruelty too then?

Mr. Laurio, never trust a beautiful woman. Especially one who's interested in you.

reply

Nah. Cruelty towards douchebags on imdb forums trolling for attention, now that i'm all for.

reply

[deleted]

watching it for the first time I think it was to show that not even animals are safe from Mick Taylor, as well as how sadistic he is because if anyone else hit one kangaroo, they'd be like "Oh sh*t", but Mick was like "Oops", "oops again", "sorry Skippy" every time he hit one.

reply

It was very (obviously) intentional humour.

reply

Or Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, with the gophers and swinging monkeys...






"Your mother puts license plates in your underwear? How do you sit?!"

reply

There was also bad practical effects but it happens

reply

I think practical effects, when done well, tend to look better. But that's not always the case. The dinosaurs in those Jurrasic Park movies looked more convincing than any of the stop motion creatures I'd seen (all due respect to Ray Harryhausen).

I am the eggman, they are the eggmen
I am the walrus, googoo goo joob goo goo goo goo joob-J Lennon

reply

a lot of the dinosaur stuff in Jurassic Park was practical - very few shots were fully CGI - they used animatronic puppets & models & then used digital models to animate them above what was physically possible, but even though the movement was digitally manipulated, the image was practical. that's why it looked so good. except for the 1st dinosaur shot - which does look pretty good still. & like you said, a far cry better than stop motion dinosaur clay puppets.

reply

They looked fine to me. I've seen much worse CGI from much higher budget productions.

If this one little scene ruined the whole film for you, you must not have really liked the film in general.

"By what right does the wolf judge the lion" - Jaime Lannister

reply

Wow yet another post from the pseudo-discerning yapping on about how legit they are for disliking CGI. Also if an innocuous thing like CGI in 40 second scene can ruin a film for you, you're an idiot

reply

Lol its funny you pick up on tht and not the ridiculous opening scene where he follows the cops and whilst driving still manages to shoot the young cop in the back of the head with a perfect shot! And to make it worse his whole head seems to explode! Tht was almost as laughable as the kangaroo scene (i turned the film off at tht point)!

reply

its necessary bcoz its australia!

reply

they tried to recruit real kangeroo`s but they wouldn`t work with non australian`s, so they had to go cgi.

she always did enjoy a good squeeze.

reply

"sorry, Skippy!"

reply