Lauren Van Buren (Too Pretty)


Did anyone else think that the actress who played Lauren was too pretty for this role? It would have made much more sense to cast someone noticeably less attractive than Dunst.

If Rydal could charm women like this who were unattached then what is the point of going through an unbelievable amount of hassle to pursue someone who's already taken. Dunst looks like a classic beauty from the era the movie is set, it just seems really strange to me that they would cast someone that's even better looking than her in a supporting role.

reply

Daisy Bevan isn't a patch on Kirsten Dunst, she is plain looking and she looks it in both the film and on the red carpet at the London premier.

reply

Daisy Bevan [...] is plain looking

... You must be low on vitamins.

reply

I concur and I thought she is purdier than dunst. But ppl have their own taste and maybe he has a thing 4 blondiezzz like I do. Hey, 1 man's fugly biatch is another's princess

Werd 2 ur mudda, bruddafckka

reply

van buren gang gotta flash the sign.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buwunI_4DZg




my personal philosophy: http://tinyurl.com/kyd5nk8

reply

Yeah, I never thought much of Kristen Dunst's looks and thought Lauren was better looking.

reply

[deleted]