MovieChat Forums > Compliance (2012) Discussion > There has to be something else going on....

There has to be something else going on...nobody is that stupid


The movie was actually pretty accurate to what happened in real life...watch the security camera tapes.

At the end of the movie they dropped a hint that Becky might have been in on it when the manager was saying she didn't really argue. Could this have been true? Could the girls have been in on it and set it up like they were the victim so they could sue this billion dollar fast food franchise and get wicked rich?

----
Don't be a hater, dear. www.youtube.com/user/dinoatcharterdotnet

reply

[deleted]

"You have to be utterly retarded and have no respect for others and lack any human decency to do something like that to another human being..." That applies to Van, but not so much Sandra, not at the start. The strip search was sold to Sandra as a kinder, gentler alternative. The caller used scary-sounding Dragnet terms: "We drag her downtown, we book her, we process her..." Sandra agrees that "That seems very extreme." So she thinks she's doing Becky a favor by "only" strip-searching her.

She's still ignorant, though, in the sense of not knowing basic rights, and so is Becky, because neither of them asks to see a *warrant*. And it doesn't occur to either of them that a real cop would not trust a civilian, a stranger, to conduct a search, and a judge wouldn't accept the results of such a search.

ETA: But Sandra is stupid, I think, and not managerial. There are several "waitaminit" moments. Like, "There's nothing in her clothes." "Well, nothing that you're trained to see." "Waitaminit, why did you have me do a search if I'm not trained for it?" Or "What surveillance team? Why was I not informed that a surveillance team was staking out the store?" And not asking how much money this was, or what the alleged victim looked like, what she ordered and when. And, almost worst of all, taking a crew member away from her position for so long. My former bosses would have balked at having a worker idle for four minutes, much less four hours. Sandra seems like a poor manager and a very poor decisionmaker and organizer.

reply

The "officer" told her to go easy on Sandra and not to argue with her and to do everything she says..., if she don't then he says she'll be arrested, and when she is, they will be much harder on her for not cooperating. What Sandra said in the interview was mostly true but I think she was making herself look better and feel better. (I believe she was talking to the news not psychologist)
Also, I see a lot of posts that say 'becky' was probably in on it, that doesn't make any sense to me bc there are over 70 cases of this guy doing this phone scam! If this was the only case I'd probably agree but it's not. The guy got away with it bc the state lacked enough "hard" evidence (he must've had a good lawyer bc I think he got acquitted bc of a technicality- and he knew the law, didn't leave hardly any tracks, and he was good at this!) BUT they caught the guy & connected him to these cases by the phone cards, he even had some in his house!

reply