MovieChat Forums > Autómata (2014) Discussion > 'Its like saying you are just an ape'

'Its like saying you are just an ape'


A single line destroys every argument against and turns your empathy towards artificial sentience.

Brilliant! Can't wait for it to come out.

reply

If you look at it logically on the face of facts it is questionable who is more intelligent out of the two species.
Do they kill each other en masse in useless wars. Do they make their lives miserable by making each other devote most of their lives to converting minerals and natural resources into material objects that don't really make them happier? do they pollute the environment making their offspring sicker and sicker with each succeeding generation? do they utilize self destructive structures like a fossil fuel based economy that will doom the species and most of the fauna of the planet to extinction?
who is more intelligent then?

reply

You've made an excellent argument for you to join the nearest ape tribe.

You seem to forget since we're related to apes, 'they do, what we do'. Yes, they are more aggressive then us. Hence, if they had the brains, they would utilize self destructive structures. Have you even bothered watching Discovery Channel? They're pretty much like us, except we have better reasoning skills. How many ape tribes live together in peace? So yes, we're more intelligent. Not sure if you are, since you're comparing base drives and evolutionary vestiges to intelligence.

reply

Do they apes continue in activities that would lead to their inevitable extinction? No.
Who is more intelligent then?

reply

Yes, they do. Case in point, they don't understand what STD's are. Whole tribes get wiped from a single infected ape.
I don't know what you think intelligence is, but apparently it's based on some secret internal gauge of yours.

In truth, I understand what you're getting at, but your arguments and examples are all wrong. You're confusing intelligence with empathic understanding.

The only animal on the planet that could be more intelligent then us is the dolphin anyway.

reply

"The only animal on the planet that could be more intelligent then us is the dolphin anyway."

if you think that brain to body ratio is an exact litmus test for intelligence potential that is quite simplistic.

And I was pretty clear. Perhaps I need to dumb it down for you. It is more about HOW you use your intelligence that proves how intelligent you are. Your definition is quite narrow and misguided. Simply saying that you can do higher mathematics and say that makes you superior to an ape doesn't quite pass muster. The human race has proven that it fails to use it's intelligence for anything that betters our chance of surviving - actually quite the opposite. We primarily use it to precipitate our extinction. That is hardly a marker of intelligence. Once we are gone another race of beings who may be looking at the causes of our demise what would you think they will say? would they say - oh how intelligent they were to use their minds in such a way or would they think how stupid they were? Think about that.

And so long and thanks for all the fish.

reply

Machine or a robot has only one purpose. That "robot" was more than just a machine/robot.

The increase in human knowledge is the cause of the decline of religions.

reply

Robot means "worker" in slavic languages.

An "ape" is a "robot" or "worker" because apes just do the same crap over and over without thinking. Apes don't ponder life, don't know they're alive, don't dream about stuff, don't care about each other, don't communicate, and don't create art. So, they're like a machine.

Humans are awesome in many ways and no ape can get anywhere close to an average human. Animals are the biological robots of the world and apes are robots.

An AI would be to machines what humans are to biological robots.

reply

How do you know what apes are thinking? They certainly know they're alive, they do care about each other, they do communicate.


I do like the quote from this movie "That's like saying you are just an ape"
It reminds me of a similar quote form I Robot

Will Smith - "Can a robot write a symphony? Can a robot turn a... canvas into a beautiful masterpiece??"

Robot - "Can you?"

reply

Matt,

Don't be stupid.

Apes do NOTHING to express their inner being, because they have no inner being. You question is like asking "How do you know Santa Claus doesn't exist" because he's magic and could be casting a doubt spell on adults.

Apes are related to humans pretty closely, so they aren't so alien that if they had complex philosophical thoughts they wouldn't try to express them. So, they have no complex thoughts and they don't know they exist.

Example: Apes are hunted by humans all the time. If apes cared about themselves or their fellows, they would do something to communicate to humans they are thinking feeling beings. They do not, so their minds at that of animals. They have more in common with ants than people.

reply

wow, humans cannot communicate amongst themselves....Christians and muslims, hindus, buddhists. catholics and protestants much less LOL

Not saying Apes have inner thoughts, but the lack of communication from humans and your lack of thinking outside the box are astounding.




http://myimpressionz.tk

reply

Please see my earlier post as a response to this idiocy you've posted. If you really are a psychologist, you're a blemish to your field.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_consciousness
http://www.world-of-lucid-dreaming.com/10-animals-with-self-awareness.html


reply

Your views seem to be straight from the 1940's or so, when scientists believed that animals didn't even feel pain. What a crock of *beep*

Animals are conscious and self-aware. Even a Goldfish is. I don't know about the insect world, but pretty much all of the higher level animals are. They dream, feel, etc. Crawl back to this century, will you?

reply

Your views are fantasy.

I'm a psychologist in real life and have studied this topic upside down and backwards. I'm a huge animal lover, but I love animals for what they are. Most people love animals because they remind them of "themselves" "children" and other such bullsh!t.

Meanwhile, great job not even getting my f!cking point.

reply

LOL so you are a psychologist? the BS artists?

Which area so i can avoid you to save money :P

For a psychologist, your ability to listen is as you say bullsh!t :P






http://myimpressionz.tk

reply

Listen to what, your uneducated nonsense?

I'm not at a mental hospital here, so I'm not interested in it.

reply

Listen to what, your uneducated nonsense?

I'm not at a mental hospital here, so I'm not interested in it.


know your strawman arguments?

Admit it you are either a mental patient or a mental midget, which is it?










http://myimpressionz.tk

reply

Do you know what a "strawman" is, because it's you who created that, not me.

Why not have this convo with your cat?

reply

That's right, a mental hospital is made of bricks and cement. Only your head is filled with bricks, so you're definitely not a mental hospital.

But if you were, I know just the patient you'd be housing....

reply

I'm confused. If you're a psychologist, are you an animal psychologist? Because animals would seem to be way our of your area of purview.

Either way, you're a psychologist who's way out of touch with reality or any form of modern psychology. Most likely, you're full of crap, because even a simple Google proves you wrong:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_consciousness
http://www.world-of-lucid-dreaming.com/10-animals-with-self-awareness.html

Apes are specifically mentioned as being self aware. You're not well versed in biological psychology are you? I wouldn't got around advertising you're a psychologist IRL.

reply

Fry,

I have read all of that, know all the philosophers, and science mentioned in the article.

Here's the deal, Voltaire said, "If there's an argument about the reality of something, it's not worth arguing about, it's philosophy. Not one argues that water is made of oxygen and hydrogen". In the case of this topic, the wiki page is just a bunch of philosophy. Animals do not communicate anything to us, because there's nothing there to communicate.

There is not question if humans are conscious, because it is obvious.


Anyway!!!

I said that animals are "robots" which means workers, which is really all animals do. If it's a mouse or an ape, they do the same things every day and never do anything creative. Animals, mostly, don't even have to learn somehow they know how to build rests, mate, and everything they do is programmed into them. That's a fact.

A type of bird will build the same type of nest as another of its type and it doesn't need to be around other birds to learn. That's an organic robot.

There is no human that knows anything about anything unless they learn it from another human. And, we don't just work, we are creative and expressive creatures. Humans are more than robots.

Also, we share nearly all of our DNA with creatures like mice and almost 100% with chimps, but they have almost nothing in common with us. We're basically all the same creature, but humans made a leap in intelligence that nothing else has.

That's the message about the AI in the movie.

reply

Here's the deal, Voltaire said, "If there's an argument about the reality of something, it's not worth arguing about, it's philosophy. Not one argues that water is made of oxygen and hydrogen".


Voltaire also lived in the 17th century and neither psychology nor biology are the disciplines he's known today for.
So who's the one presenting the "argument with no reality"?

In the case of this topic, the wiki page is just a bunch of philosophy. Animals do not communicate anything to us, because there's nothing there to communicate.


Animals do communicate, sometimes even inter-species.
http://blog.ted.com/2013/06/06/talking-with-animals-7-examples-of-inte rspecies-communication/
Also if that's any factor: The majority of human issues arise from failure of communication and lack of empathy.
In all reality it's humans that too often fail at communication, even with their own species.

There is not question if humans are conscious, because it is obvious.


Just because you think you are real, does not mean that everything you think is actually real. Cogito ergo sum is an highly introspect statement, which lacks any real outside proof.

You might consider yourself "conscious", but who's to say that your consciousness shares anything at all with mine? In the end we are all just stuck in our own heads, with very subjective definitions of "human consciousness".

But in the end there is no such thing as an "general human consciousness" which is in any kind or shape definable.

I said that animals are "robots" which means workers, which is really all animals do.


First: That's not the definition of a "robot", not at all. This is what an robot actually is supposed to be: "A robot is an automatic mechanical device often resembling a human or animal."


If those animals are "workers", who are they working for? Their own survival? So what are humans working for? I don't know about you, but i'm mostly working for food, shelter and medical treatment, survival so to speak.


If it's a mouse or an ape, they do the same things every day and never do anything creative.


The vast majority of humanity does "the same things every day", it's what's required to survive. And what do you consider "creative" in that regard?

Maybe art? http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20140723-are-we-the-only-creative-spec ies

Well duh.. these days we even manage to build neuron networks capable of "art": http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2533587/


Animals, mostly, don't even have to learn somehow they know how to build rests, mate, and everything they do is programmed into them. That's a fact.


Programmed into them.. by whom? How did we poor poor humans ever manage to get this far, considering schools and nurseries have only been existing for like a couple of thousand years to "program" us in a survivable shape?!

A type of bird will build the same type of nest as another of its type and it doesn't need to be around other birds to learn. That's an organic robot.


That's merely because there at not too many ways you can build a nest out of the same materials. If you'd be forced to build a sleeping place with only a couple of sticks and leaves, your sleeping place would look hell of a lot similar to those of other people building with leaves and sticks.


There is no human that knows anything about anything unless they learn it from another human. And, we don't just work, we are creative and expressive creatures. Humans are more than robots.


Humans are mere biological machines, just like animals. What you keep labeling as "consciousness", is for all purpose and effect the "spark" which keeps every biological machine going: A command system consisting of billions of neurons which keep on firing and the "spark" alive throughout the whole nervous system.


That's some basic biochemistry for you..


Also, we share nearly all of our DNA with creatures like mice and almost 100% with chimps, but they have almost nothing in common with us. We're basically all the same creature, but humans made a leap in intelligence that nothing else has.


"We" are all the same creature, but humans are somehow "samer" than the other creatures? That's mere human hubris and ignorance. As humans we often also don't have a lot in common with each other, in many cases humans don't even share the same way of communicating (languages). A problem not many other biological machines run into, at least with their own species 😋

But i guess i figured out your issue, are you by any chance religious?

reply

[deleted]

'Its like saying you are just an ape'



the stronger sentiment is the one he says straight after

not just an Ape, a violent Ape











http://myimpressionz.tk

reply

Biological or mechanical, we are all machines.
The whole universe is a big machine.

reply

I'm an ape and I find this offensive...

I found something was wrong with that sentence. They state apes don't have a soul nor are they conscious. It should have been it's like saying you are just a bag of meat and bones.

reply

------

reply

Its about the level of evolution.
Do you sit comfortable in your tree?

---
Lincoln Lee: I lost a partner.
Peter Bishop: I lost a universe!

reply

I agree that was a brilliant line.
Not wanting to get into the morality of this entire topic, whether 'murdering' the robot was okay or not.

reply

[deleted]

It was silly futurist babble. Apes are living beings. Machines aren't. Even single-celled organisms that were the first lifeforms on earth are more advanced than any machine.

reply

That's not true. The hardware that keeps memories and learns is already there. AI will become sentient when it can think about what it is, where it came from, gains memories and has personal (unique) experiences to influence its behavior. Even the inherited genetics for the make-up of human dna can be replicated and altered.
In essence the only things making you alive are those portrayed in the movie. It was well-thought through. When smarter than human AI would create the two security-boundaries for those following robots, it could still make a mistake here or there, depending on how far advanced it was. It made a couple of mistakes, so the bio-kernel grew and changed along the way.

reply

Is sentience life? Is a tree not living? Why is it more difficult to replicate organic lifeforms (and I'm not talking about cloning) than it is to build a machine that can teach itself to be intellectually more advanced the humanly possible?

Advanced intelligence doesn't imply advanced being, as it's not life. All it implies is advanced computational ability. Nature is far more complicated.







reply

I think the statement was a comparsion of the level of evolution and not the complexity of materials.
It saw itself as much as just a machine, as we see ourselves just as apes. Well at least I dont see myself just as an ape. I insist to be distinguished as a human. Not many apes can say that.

The robots in the movie were built by humans for lesser tasks.

---
Lincoln Lee: I lost a partner.
Peter Bishop: I lost a universe!

reply

What strikes me is that for the first time a robot used sarcasm.
Now that is a human response.
Like the IMDB boards when lower apes get upset at higher apes. Or v/v.
And then they both go apesheet.

reply