MovieChat Forums > The Imposter (2012) Discussion > What I believe happened.

What I believe happened.


Nicholas came home from playing basketball angry at his mother for not picking him up and angry at his brother for not waking up his mother. I don't think a screaming match ensued between the three, but most likely attitude was thrown left and right until finally it hit a nerve in Jason. He probably pushed Nicholas or chased him in attempt to hurt him (not kill) and in the process Nicholas fell and died. My guess is he hit his head on something.

The mother (Beverly) and Jason ended up realizing that they couldn't call the police because of their history with drugs and Beverly's recent drug addiction. They would most likely end up serving serious time seeing they were unfit guardians in possession of drugs when Nicholas died. Therefore they plan to hide the body. They end up burying it in the backyard just how it was said in the film. Fastforward: Beverly checks into rehab within months of the disappearance. Kinda strange to alienate yourself from your family after your child disappears if you ask me. And the fact that she did it almost immediately tells me she wanted to be clean just in case the police ever came to ask her questions.

In the following year or so, I believe Beverly ends up telling Carey what happened. I don't think Carey was there the night Nicholas died nor did she have any involvement whatsoever. Fastforward a few months: the memories of the house where Nicholas died become too much for Beverly to handle so they move. Before they move she has Jason dig up Nicholas' body and dump it somewhere else. This would explain the leftover pieces of tarp or whatever the new homeowner found back there.

Fastforward 2 years later: Carey gets a call that they "found" her brother. First we're told that she screamed over the phone (possibly horrified because it was not possible since Nicholas was dead; OR remember she wasn't there the night Nicholas died, so she must have believed that her mother and brother lied to her and her scream was sincere because she believed her little brother was actually alive). News about "Nicholas" being found in Spain gets back to Beverly and Jason. They reassure her that the boy they have found is not Nicholas because they know what they did. Instead, they make up a plan to go along with and whoever that "person" that comes home claiming to be Nicholas is will be brought into their family with open arms so it becomes believable just in case the truth of the impostor is ever revealed they will come out looking like innocent victims.

They knew if they didn't go along with it, most likely the police would relaunch the investigation of Nicholas after they were done dealing with the impostor. They never meant for the truth of this impostor posing as Nicholas to get out. They wanted to live their lives as if this really were Nicholas. So when the FBI agent called Carey and told her not to come to the airport, she did it anyway acting as if nothing were wrong. That was Carey's way of telling the agent to leave them alone/they're fine. I think right after the phone call, Carey went to Beverly and told her the truth was out. They made one last attempt by Beverly telling Carey to go pick up "Nicholas" and bring him home. They knew if he stayed with the agent, everything would be revealed that night. But like Frederico said "it was only a matter of weeks" before the full truth came out. There was no preventing it. It was inevitable in this case. But God knows this family tried. We all saw how hard they attempted to keep this "boy returns home after disappearing 3 yrs ago" heroic tale from the media. No one does that.

So bottom line, both Frederico and the family knew the actual truth. However, I don't think they ever told one another what they knew. They sort of just pretended and settled on a silent agreement. "You pretend to be Nicholas for us, you can live your life here in America". It would make sense that they never talked to each other about it. They would both benefit from the silent deal. At this point, Frederico managed to put all the pieces together and concluded that they in fact killed the real Nicholas. Why else would they pretend that he was their son? I honestly do not believe he was lying when he said this. The whole "Beverly confessed to me" I think is made up in an attempt to make the mother look even more guilty than she already was. Basically he put salt in the wound at the last minute for no valid reason other than to taunt the family. And it worked.

Months after the scandal was exposed, Jason knows as long as he's around, the closer the police will get to naming him the prime suspect. I wouldn't say he committed suicide per se. He was probably on a downward spiral and by the time the truth was revealed he was at his end. No Jason=Dead end (no pun intended). Which is exactly what happened. Carey and Beverly can now breathe a sigh of relief. The truth along with possible evidence died with Jason.

There were so many things in this documentary that made me extremely suspicious of the family.
-very beginning; how can someone not recognize there own flesh and blood? it was 3 yrs for crying out loud.
-Jason's odd apathetic behavior upon learning "Nicholas" had returned
-Carey still showing up at the airport even after being told not to, after learning that the FBI agent knew "Nicholas" was not Nicholas
-Mother refused (went ballistic) to do a blood test to prove whether "Nicholas" was her son or not
-Jason reporting to the police, one month after Nicholas' disappearance, that Nicholas tried to break into the home. No other sighting was ever reported by anyone therefore giving off the impression Jason was trying to throw off police by making it seem Nicholas was still alive and a runaway
-the family moving from the home
-mother failing the third polygraph test very unusually. Test was going off the charts
-Right after Nicholas went missing they claimed the story never made it on the news. this makes me believe that they didn't do enough to put the story out there. It's very unusual for a white family in southern Texas to be completely ignored when they report a child missing. Just saying.
-why wasn't there more of the investigation? why didn't the police ever question the family? My guess is the family tried to throw them off multiple times to the point where they didn't see a reason to suspect them in anything.

Carey and Beverly are two very lucky people. In my opinion, they got away scot free. However, they will always live with the guilt and trauma of the disappearance of Nicholas. Which is well deserved since I think they killed him.

It's so strange how life works. It's as if this was all meant to be even under the unusual circumstances. Somehow, a professional con artist/sociopath/liar stumbles upon the name "Nicholas Barclay" when looking for an identity to steal. It's almost as if Nicholas himself was trying to reach out so finally the truth of his murder could get out and justice could be served. Even if it meant just becoming a theory. Knowing people doubt Carey and Beverly was probably enough justice for Nicholas.

Welcome to the island of misfit toys.

reply

Well said, sounds plausible.

reply

Pure speculation.

Beverly could have gone to rehab and for all sorts of reasons - maybe the ordeal of having her child missing got to her. The family could have moved (from a home that had so much pain when they lived there) for all sorts of reasons. You think a family who's child went missing would never move?

People can convince themselves of incredible things when it suits them. Traumatized minds can do very odd things and denial is very powerful. Having a missing child is one of the worst things a family can go through and maybe they just wanted to believe it so much that they convinced themselves that it was him and couldn't bare the possibility that the FBI or a blood test would disprove it.

Maybe Jason did see Nicholas - he might have ran off and considered coming home or was angry at the family and tried to break into the house. Maybe Jason was hallucinating on drugs and thought he saw him. Maybe he saw a child that looked like Nicholas and wanted to think it was him so much. We just don't know.

People can fail polygraphs when under great stress. She passed the first two.

Over 2000 children a day go missing in the US. Most do not make news. The family say that they were the only ones trying to generate publicity and make news about Nicholas. They might be lying, but there's no evidence they are. In fact the film maker who has investigated the case says that's a good point. I don't know why you think they were trying to keep the "Nicholas was found" storyline out of the press, there's nothing suggest that. Even if they did it might be because they are private people.

Also remember Jason behaved in an odd, apathetic way only according to Frederic Bourdin. A compulsive liar.

I'm not saying that a similar scenario to yours cannot be true, but there's no proof for any of it. We can't be labelling people as murderers without proof.

reply

Speculation or not, it was a bloody good read from the OP which made me re-evaluate certain aspects of the story.

This film/docu was the best I seen since Brother's Keeper.

reply

http://youtu.be/Y0TnU80idDA

watch this film analysis. This documentary is brilliant.

reply

http://www.imdb.com/user/ur10065577/, That was Very interesting. I will never look at a documentary the same again. Thanks for the link.

reply

Totally agree.

reply

I don't disagree with you. I don't think it was necessarily a murder but something happened and he died accidentally somehow. They panicked and decided to cover it up.

It's either this theory...or....they truly believed this guy was Nicholas. Granted they didn't seem like the smartest bunch of people on the planet, but I don't know how you can possibly fall for something like this. It just doesn't make any sense.

reply

Yeah I can't say for sure that it was on purpose but some of the family members were involved in his disappearance. I don't know if everyone pretty much picked up on this even at the beginning of the documentary before the imposter guy was mentioned but just to me the interviews with the family members and their stories seemed suspicious. I was thinking the whole time..something doesn't seem right with them. So I wasn't actually shocked when we found out that they could have been responsible..I was just shocked that they actually went through the investigation on them because I thought they would not even question that and blame everything on the guy pretending to be Nicholas.

reply

[deleted]

Thoroughly enjoyed reading you well thought out hypothesis. If I have one gripe though, it would be that kept misspelling the word (and the title of the movie). It's IMPOSTER, NOT impostor.

reply

[deleted]