MovieChat Forums > The Hunger Games: Catching Fire (2013) Discussion > Anyone else sick of hearing that THG isn...

Anyone else sick of hearing that THG isn't a rip-off of Battle Royale?


Everytime I see a post about how The Hunger Games is a rip-off of Battle Royale I start getting proud of our American youth for being so opened-minded toward Asian culture. I'm not a fanatic, but I feel the need to defend it because they are both just the same. And because there are more than just a few similarities, it means one ripped the other off.

Both stories are essentially echoing the Tokyo WWF Colosseum. Its possible that Susan Collins was inspired by Japanese or Korean wrestling. But its also likely she was inspired by Battle Royale, Battle Royale 2, 1984, the actual novel upon which it was based, the Battle Royale comic-book, and a ton of other popular and culturally significant Battle Royale ripoffs. Let's take THG as it is - a no-holds-barred work of abject plagiarism, and move on!

Thank you for your time.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

No. I'm sick of hearing that it is a ripoff of Battle Royale. I don't care about Battle Royale, I'm probably never gonna watch it, and I don't care at all if THG ripped it off. And everyone who complains about it just sounds bitter that THG was more successful. Get over it.

Reportin' live for Black TV: White folks are dead, we gettin' the f*@# outta here!

reply

THG was more successful. Get over it.
Actually, THG has got a looooooooong way to go before it catches up with BR2, but that's only to be expected. Of course the influential thing will always be thought of more highly than the stuff that it influenced....

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

With The Hunger Games, the decade old tradition of Hollywood continues, taking it all (from the first frame to the last) from an engrossingly well made Japanese Thriller called "BATTLE ROYALE 2" released in 2003. Did they take the rights of the Japanese thriller 'BATTLE ROYALE 2' or just copied it shamelessly as per modern Hollywood's tradition?

In short, the director and his writer take 90% ingredients for their over-cooked script from the Japanese Film. Then they add a love-sex angle to it as a mandatory clause of Twilightesque Film-making technique. To make it more spicier, they bring in some eunuch characters into the narration with the get-up earlier used in their own films. And further, sprinkling it with a few emotional sequences about some broken families, they are ready with their latest flick The Hunger Games, taking advantage of the brand name.

As I have realised, many of my reader friends here would like to say that, "We don't really care if it's a copy or not, so cut out the allegation crap and just let us know whether the movie is good or bad and that's it." In answer to that I would only like to say that The Hunger Games is an Open Creative Theft made by the Collis camp in this current age of world-wide- web. Now, a theft remains a theft, whether done carelessly or with utmost care and devotion. Even if it happens to be a too good movie (which fortunately it isn't), still it remains a Shameless Robbery of any other person's creative work and nothing else. And I am simply not interested in writing a detailed review of a copied movie.

However, for all my friendly readers, who are willing to know more about Cinema in details, I would like to present this movie as a fine lesson in learning few important things about Hollywood Film-making style.

1. Hollywood film-maker's biggest problem is that we still are not sure of what genre we are dealing in while making a film. The current The Hunger Games copies a fast paced cruel bloody Japanese thriller "BATTLE ROYALE" , it's a Bloody Suspense Thriller and it remains a bloody suspense thriller throughout.

But The Hunger Games not even remains a thriller in its more than 2 hours of duration. There is an added track in it of a beautiful model girl who is in love with the hero as Love essentially has to be there like sugar or salt in a dish. There are many unwanted eunuchs and unmoving stories of broken families inserted into it which were not required at all. The soundtrack has surprisingly all love songs in a SCIFI THRILLER movie like a variety served on the dinner table by its makers.

2. Secondly in this new age of fresh creative minds, we still follow double standards in showing the characters of our male and female leads. Now in the original flick the lead character or the hero is not a female. But in our Tweenie version the hero becomes a strong female character. So the writers give a certain amount of disrespect to the very source they are copying from directly.

But on the other hand The Hunger Games has a sexy-model beefcake characters played by eunuchs, who simply have no definite role in the movie but is added only to be exploited as a male butt rump.

That's the double standard mind-set Hollywood actually works in.

3. Thirdly after watching both the movies, you will have a clear idea of what it means by the term "Added Sub Plots" which in most of the cases ruin the real essence of a film. In this case too, where the original keeps walking on a single track and never gets distracted from its basic storyline of BATTLE ROYALE, its USA copy keeps wandering between its various added subplots which could have been easily avoided. Frankly speaking we can't even stick to a basic storyline even when its all copied from another brilliant source.

4. Lastly and more importantly, if you even copy the idea for the Poster of your film along with its script then I wonder what the whole team actually may have done as far as creativity is concerned in this project. Here the makers of The Hunger Games not only copy their whole film from the Japanese Original scene to scene, but they also copy their posters. Now that's really a great amount of research done by the team.

Summing up, with The Hunger Games, the Gary Ross camp continues to try for their next box office success in American Cinema by taking the credit of all the hard work done by someone else residing in a different part of the globe far away……and they have really mastered this shameful act of "Art of Inspiration" by now. (However, I would love to be surprised with the impossible news that they actually did buy the rights this time.)

reply

I heard Battle Royale was created for Nazi propaganda....

reply

I'm getting tired of people comparing the Hunger Games to Battle Royale. It gets old quickly.

If it's all the same to you, I'll have that drink now.-Loki (Marvel's Avengers)

reply

I noticed the blatant plagiarism starting on page one. The similarities that jumped out at me: (the above article points out a lot more)There are children taken against their will to fight it out to the death. In one, they are given random weapons. In the other, they have to scavenge for random weapons. Both are found in backpacks. The children will be killed if they try to escape. They are both set in the “not distant” future and the underlying premise is for control. Although, this is a bit misleading because this is the film premise and not quite the book’s (for Battle Royale .) Having said that, I honestly didn’t think about Battle Royale 2 until quite a bit after reading The Hunger Games, and it was more of a “Heh, that does remind me of that!” sort of thing. It didn’t take away from my enjoyment of thg at all. What took away from it was the slow decline in quality throughout the trilogy. The first book was amazing. The second was good. The third was thrown to a wall to see what stuck. At least it’s not another remake, good lord! They don’t even wait twenty, thirty years anymore. They will remake something two years old!

One of the things that did bother me is that Collins says that she never even heard of Battle Royale until after writing the book, lying through her teeth. I would understand that if it was only the book that was out, or if she had written her books twenty years ago. However, considering how huge Battle Royale was and how American YA authors couldn’t stop talking about how much Battle Royale influenced them (even wearing a japanese school uniform to the US premiere and having an homage with the rugby jumpsuit, and using actress Chiaki), I found it a little hard to believe. Impossible, in fact.

reply

I never heard of Battle Royale until after I got into Hunger Games. I agree about the decline of quality of the Hunger Games book trilogy.`You're also right about remakes. Gets old if they keep doing it over and over again.

If it's all the same to you, I'll have that drink now.-Loki (Marvel's Avengers)

reply

This is a great example of a Hollywood budget that was utterly wasted. The reason you go to a movie like this is not to have the pivotal action scenes left up to the imagination. The acting is atrocious. It seems to be making fun of itself at times, which is just sad. Is it SNL or is it a 15 dollar per ticket Hollywood feature? It's odd because this movie cost 125 million dollars and yet it has all the special effects of a made for TV movie...

reply

[deleted]