This is a useless remake. It offers nothing new beyond the original, which was a great film it its own right.
Sissy Spacek > Chloe Grace Moritz
Isn't that what people like to say about pretty muchall remakes? I actually thought it was pretty good for what it was, as it wasn't a scene-for-scene remake and did do things to set itself apart from the original.
Respect what you have 🌌
Isn't that what people like to say about pretty much all remakes?
Since 'Carrie' was never a novel, there's nothing new to add beyond the original film.
now I know you're just being a troll
1976 film strayed too far from the original source material
Naw-the 76 novel was written as series of articles and interviews after all of the events so it had to be rearranged to make a film.
shareack ack
shareYeah...I didn't like this remake...original will always be the best...I hate how she levitates in this film...it's laughable. She doesn't fly in the book lol.
shareShe does also levitate in the original film, even though not in the same exact fashion. Just watch it again. After unleashing some of her revenge, she slowly levitates in a standing position down off the stage to the floor, and resumes walking.
share[deleted]
The story is the same, but the theme is different. Brian DePalma was too focused on making a horror film, then what the novel was about. It was a social commentary on bullying and how it affects our society. This film is needed because of how much worse bullying has become. Its more of a tragedy, which is what the book is about.
Be Brave and Never Give Up ^.^
Its more of a tragedy, which is what the book is about.
It is a real comedy when adults are trying to play teenagers in the story where the age is a point.
Accidental double post
share1.) It's called acting, not a documentary
2.) Ages of actors are not relevant to a films genre
3.) Sue, Chris and Billy were played by ACTors in their twenties
When you're 17 a cow can seem dangerous and forbidden...am I alone here?