MovieChat Forums > Pompeii (2014) Discussion > The things I feel hurt this film the mos...

The things I feel hurt this film the most...


For me, these are the things that really detracted from what had the potential to be a GREAT EPIC movie.

1) Very poor dialogue writing IMO Boring and really predictable. I found myself knowing almost exactly what the characters were going to say before they said it.

2) What in the world was that accent Kiefer was trying to do? I realize he was trying to NOT sound like growly voiced Jack Bauer, but...

3) Pure waste of Sasha Roiz. I adore him as Captain Renard on Grimm and was hoping for so much more in this film from his character.

Really solid cast overall, I think but couldn't bring the film past its own inherent weaknesses. Scenery, ambience and special effects were decent enough. But overall a disappointment. I love this historic time period. I was looking so forward to this movie and it could've been so much more. I gave it a rating of 6/10



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"You can't fix faith, River. Faith fixes you." Shepherd Book, Firefly

reply

Lol, I couldn't agree more. I thought I had seen the film somewhere before but can't for the life of me work out what it reminds me of

reply

It reminded me of clash of the titans

reply

One would think that Hollywood had learned its (costly) lesson with this type of movie in the Box Office disaster that was Pearl Harbor: to bookend a love story around a very real and tragic event, making more of the love story THAN the event didn't work then and it still doesn't work now.

It's said that the definition of insanity is doing the exact same thing over and over again expecting a different result. I believe Hollywood has indeed gone insane.

..Joe

reply

[deleted]

I agree this definitely reminded me of Gladiator and Titanic: the new lovers running from disaster AND the "bad guy" (Titanic). Gladiators becoming loyal friends-the hero plus a big soulful black man. But the lack of originality didn't bother me-2 other things did:

I like the fighting but after awhile, especially after the disaster struck, it all got so repetitious. It just went on and on. And there was no pay off for all the struggle and suffering. No one got away, NO ONE. Not even the gladiator friend. It was quite a downer. At least in the Titanic movie, Rose lived to tell the tale.

reply

You think they would but that obsession with appealing to as many market demographics as possible for increase profit always gets the better of Hollywood

reply

Except Pearl Harbor wasn't a box-office disaster ($449mil on a $140mil budget)

reply

Adding to that, would be more emphasis on the plot itself. The base plot for the film was Pompeii not Cassia & Milo's love story, which was the subplot. The debacle is inevitable when subplot inundates the plot. They should have commenced with Pompeii and ended with its obliteration. The characters involved would only be a part of their story not vice-versa. Another misery here were the leads. Let's hire an actor who, maybe a little, at least looks like a gladiator. Emily, though one of likable actresses, was too young and scrawny in her appearance. Even though I haven't read the script, I highly doubt there would a prescription for emaciated lead girl prescribed in it.

reply

Only problem I had with it was how it ended. It just abruptly ended with them dying, and the movie was only an hour and 20 minutes long. It's like the writers wrote the beginning, and then they were like, wait, what happens after the volcano erupts?

reply


Actually I liked that the movie only lasted 1 h 20 minutes... less would have been much better... for me, the best part of the movie is the end, right after the credits

reply


Actually I liked that the movie only lasted 1 h 20 minutes... less would have been much better... for me, the best part of the movie is the end, right after the credits

reply

For me, it ended at the 1 hour 37 mark. Them dying was at 1:36:53, only seconds before the film ended. :P

Winter is coming

reply

I agree with most of things that are already listed here and I would add overall use of CGI to the list. I understand that with scenes involving volcano eruption or other mayhem normal use of CGI is on its place, but here there is almost no shot of real nature - every backround and all seems to be computer generated. I believe that even nowadays even when filming scenes of chaos and disaster good directors combine CGI with practical effects...

reply

I am normally pretty forgiving with movies like this, but I can't think of anything to defend Pompeii. Terrible script and terrible acting, with very average CGI. 4/10.

reply

I think the film improves if you can step away from Gladiator and view it as a separate entity, not trying to "copy" larger productions (Gladiator, Titanic, Romeo & Juliet).

First time through, I thought it was awful.

Second time through, I started to like it a tiny bit.

Third time through, with the commentary, I appreciated how much hard work had gone into it.

Fourth time through ... I really enjoyed it.

Granted, this shouldn't HAVE to happen and that is the mark of a film with issues -- but it improved on me with time.

I do think it's missing something, though I'm not sure what that is.

reply

I just could not believe we had such a nice line up of actors but the directing, camera work, editing and something else i can't put my hand on was just awful otherwise this could have been great. There were points where camera effects felt like i was watching a very low budget b movie!

---------------------
"It's game over man, it's game over!!!"

reply

Personally, I thought the dialogue was weak and the gore should have been increased.

Then again, this movie was deliberately trying to be a simple, old-fashioned adventure picture.

reply