It's no secret that the third season has been pretty haphazard and that the quality (and execution) of the stories have been lacking. And then along comes the "House on the Lake" episode, and for the first time this season it feels like that old PW magic is back. Don't misunderstand: this ep isn't perfect (finding the locket, bloody handkerchief under the washer, none of which was mentioned by the witnesses which suggests that the producers once again may have embellished the story) but it's still superior to what we've been offered so far this year. Hopefully this isn't an isolated incident and is in fact a positive indicator of good things to come from this show. :)
I agree, between this and the Sante Muerte one it feels like Season 3 has been on an uptick. For the most part it's been an entertaining season but most of the stories haven't been really scary, these two are actually quite creepy.
This time he left out some inconvenient details that he was married. And why would a real estate investor buy a home and not do a title research that would have revealed that it was a sanitarium where many people died. Like David Oman of the Manson episode he was looking to buy a house that he can later say turned out to be haunted.
The Santa Muerte one was freaky, I haven't seen the House on the Lake he but am currently watching the Lynchvile one. Those voices she is catching are terrifying reminds me of the BUBBA! Scream.
People leave out things because they don't have time to air every detail. These haunting a happen over the period of years. Not to mention, why put the same events on every show you do? I lived in a haunted house and I know for a fact everything that happened to me and my family would never fit into a one hour tv show !
There's a difference between things being left out from editing and someone with a growing list of narrative issues every time they tell their story. I'll give you a for instance with the classic Connecticut haunting.
Ol' Carmen Reed (Snedeker) has all kind of details that come out with each telling. I've seen five different shows of varying lengths, plus read many articles and interviews, and every time she has some glaring inconsistencies. Now, even I can admit and make provisions for much being victim to edits and time contraints between, say, the 2hr A Haunting premiere special, the Real Fear segment on Chiller where she talks to the Real Fear people at the museum where some artifacts from the home are supposedly kept, and the 1hr episode within this series. The differences in length and how each program is edited will surely distort the narrative in some manner.
What it won't do, however, is cause such stark inconsistencies as her saying that she drove some 300 miles to see the home while her husband was at work (A Haunting, 2002 special) and her initially waiting in the car while her husband checks the place out first, at her insistence, before joining him in looking it over (Paranormal Witness, 2012). Until this episode aired, everything I'd watched and read from Carmen stated she rented the home without her husband guidance. He wasn't involved until after the home was rented.
It also doesn't explain how, in 2002, they had no clue the place was formerly a funeral home until they had moved in yet in 2012 they had it figured out before and begrudgingly moved in because there was nowhere else suitable for them to go.
In previous versions, she's getting the place ready to move in all by her lonesome and, when she goes to clean the floors, the water turns to blood. Here, they're moved in, she's had no experiences, and the kids claim blood is coming from the walls. She's all "Pshaw, y'all just seeing paint that dried when it was running. There's no such thing as ghosts."
She states all the crucifixes disappeared in this episode and yet she's showing off one of the supposed crucifixes in Real Fear claiming the evil forces had burned off the head and hands.
She's also fond of leaving out that there were other tenants in the home (having been converted into a duplex) that lived upstairs who never never saw or heard anything.
Ray Garton, who wrote the book on the alleged haunting, is on record as stating: "Their son, around whom their entire story centered, was nowhere to be found. I never met him. I was allowed to talk to him briefly on the phone, but as soon as he started telling me that the things he "saw" in the house went away after he'd been medicated, Carmen abruptly ended the conversation."
So yes, while it's impossible to tell every bit of a story years after the fact, one has to admit that sometimes it's just repackaged BS.
I also saw a few inconsistencies regarding this story. I do remember the A Haunting episodes for this event as well as the Paranormal Witness episode and I also was confused on a couple things. But I took that as them just leaving things out so it's not so monotonous. I would like her to address the questions you brought up, though. It would be interesting to hear which part of her story is true, did she rent it alone or with her husband. Good observations, though! I might do some research on it myself now that you brought it up lol