[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
No offence amigo, but it works both ways (i.e, do you maybe think people rag on a movie *because* it's garbage?)
As it stands, I love the original (but can't stand reboots, remakes or sequels) but nonetheless went along to see this with few expectations (and it was worse than I thought it would be)
My main gripe (apart from Goslings 'patented' thousand yard stare) was the actual plot (it didn't justify the running time, nor was it interesting enough to even warrant a sequel)
People saying "it's a worthy follow-up" clearly have been watching a different Blade Runner (1982) to me? Without several references, Harrison Ford and the occasional soundbite.....you could release this as a sequel to 'The Sound Of Music' (and I don't think anyone would notice?)
Fair play if you enjoyed it....But it's only been on release for a few days (and the fanboys are already calling it a masterpiece and that is equally annoying to me) As it stands (regardless of contrasting opinion) I highly doubt anyone will be talking about this movie this time next year?