That's not called rape. You're describing a different crime.
Totally agree.
If you consent to having sex, which Nick did, you aren't raped.
Yeah, technically, I don't think Nick consented to that first act.
While some lazy reporters say Julian Assange faces rape charges what he is actually suspected of doing is tricking multiple women into thinking he was being monogamous with them, at the same time. My prediction? The anglosphere will move towards the Swedish model...
Here is a question about that episode... On the car ride to Rosalee and Munroe's wedding Nick and Juliet figure out that Nick banged Adalind, while she looked like Juliet, and he thought she
was Juliet.
Juliet is angry, furious. My recollection is that Nick rolled with it, not realizing it would strip him of his Grimm-ness. My recollection is that Juliet was furious, shockingly unreasonably furious -- with Nick. Since Nick was deceived, why was Juliet so furious?
Was it that she realized that he was way more enthusiastic about this most recent act of coitus, than he had ever been when it was really Juliet and Nick? Was it jealousy, because Adalind satisfied him in ways she was incapable of doing?
Was this foreshadowing that Adalind would take Juliet's place as Nick's gal?
Some people, including maybe Grimm's writers, say no real man can ever be raped, because all real men are ready for, um, action, anytime, any place, anywhom. It is a terrible meme, of course.
Some people mocked the Guantanamo captives who complained about female interrogators sexually assaulting them. And I would ask them to consider being a straight man captive, being interrogated by a sexually aggressive male interrogator. Does the any action, anytime, any place, anywhom rule apply then?
reply
share