When you see an almost-30 year old performer doing moves that an 8 year old could do, your reaction isn't going to be "Wow, she's good!"
This is not a slur against the performer. It's just not a thought that is going to cross your mind.
Well, you (the general "you") might, but you'd be, even if only subconsciously, grading on a curve, quite possibly spurred by the fact that you were one of those people who tuned in for Katharine McPhee, knew of her, yet had no idea she could dance at all. Which I'm sure had some kind of cheap, and I do mean cheap, cognate amongst trying to earn sentiment for Karen via Kat on the part of the marketing department. But it backfired for the audience in toto, especially those who did not come in as particular McPhee fans from the off. They expected all the extant pre-Smash Kat fans would start drooling in approbation at what Kat - not Karen - could do as a "surprise!". Using the cult of personality bleed-through to make Karen more popular and accepted from the off.
Problem: it backfired.
By calling attention to Kat's dancing and treating it as something we should marvel over, because we spent so much time on the learning process with her trying to increase our viewer identification; yet simultaneously having other characters tell us overtly that Karen's not picking up quickly and is showing by her dancing that she's too green for this role, they were just creating more confusion in the viewer's minds. Again the dichotomy: you have to think it's marvelous that naive little Karen Cartwright can do it at all, but she's also supposed to be "certainly trained" enough to the point where it's not silly for her to show up in contention for this role.
Conversely, I knew as much about Megan Hilty's dance talent as I knew about her acting talent (read: nothing as of yet), so of course when the show trots out Ivy to us, presents us Ivy matter-of-factly as able to do all this choreography, the promo continuing to describe her as "triple-threat" (to the point that PBS was still trotting it out at end of first season for Megan's appearance at the Capitol 4th); as we discussed I believe ages ago, I believe the story utterly.
By shining less of a spotlight around the momentous occasion of Ivy dancing, THEN they create their real, solid viewer identification. Poor real underdog! Just shows up like a trouper, the hawt director doesn't seem to appreciate her contribution for free (to HIS audition no less - basically Ivy got him the job) and blows her off; but "Karen's green, but she's certainly been trained!" he will wet-dream enthusiastically 30 minutes later. About the character whom they've shown us "screwing up".
Conversely, the more marvelous they tell us in-show that Karen is by executing simple steps, and the more members of the audience who look at it and think "yeah, they have asked for dancing as part of her job and that's clearly dancing; so what? It's not particularly flashy or thrilling dancing, even a duffer like me can tell this is standard dance knowledge," the more of a spotlight it shines on the fact that - just like Ivy - we expect Karen to be up to a certain standard. The fussing over Karen's dancing - extra time and verbal scoldings - hangs a lantern on it. Requires us to infer that it is more marvelous than they tell us it is when she "nails it", simultaneously hoist by the script's own petard.
reply
share