I thought the movie was alright (I gave it a 7) but I haven't really thought about it since I saw it in the theatre. It felt like a very hipster movie, and since 2010s are the hipster decade, that means in 10 years it will no longer be as relevant as we will have a new style and new generation of people who will no longer be into that style. It was a fine movie but it just feels like it's too trendy. Too much of that trendy feel most certainly ages a film. Look at She's the Man (2006). Very different film of course, but it is now 10 years old and it looks like and feels every one of those years. No more preppy/emo-luxurious-striving for riches, now it's retro-hippy-trashy-classy throwback.
Styles change and I guarantee you that in a decade, Her will encapsulate perfectly what the 2010s style and culture was like, and little more. I found it to be (as I said earlier) a bit forgettable. But it wasn't a bad movie by any means.
Contrasting, I think Under the Skin is one of the best films of the decade so far, because that one doesn't feature any societal or fashionable trends to rule it. It's a work singular to itself. Although modern, it is set in it's own little world, which I bet will age nicely. A lot of people hated it but I think it will gain its audience and better appreciation down the road. I hope :)
reply
share