Nice boobs


was anybody eles thinking man at least her boobs have made this movie some what watchable......but in all honesty the original is far better

reply

[deleted]

You do realize the purpose of the gratuitous boob shots through out the film are to make you feel like a pervert following the reveal?

reply

True . . . but they sure were nice!

reply

Why would you feel like a pervert? She is of age. There is nothing perverted about looking at an adult womans breasts.


http://twitter.com/superman_7731

reply

It was somewhat distracting for me that I missed the whole point of the film. Directors should be fired for allowing this to happen. haha

"TROLLS" want their 15 minutes of fame...





reply

SuperMan: True, but I think that the character of Sarah was intended to be about five years younger than Elizabeth Olsen's actual age of 25. Twenty years old is, of course, "of age," but there is still, particularly for a male viewer of more than 25, a certain amount of guilt involved in slavering over her. It's sort of like Hitchcock's way of involving his audience in the crimes of his characters.

reply

um. im a 31 year old (straight) female, and even *i* thought her boobs looked great. so i dont really think it had anything to do with feeling like a pervert only to feel appalled at the end of the movie. its not like she was wearing a little school girl's uniform or anything kinky like that. she's hot. nothing wrong with appreciating her good looks.

reply

Thanks, Cherry! Unlike so many of her peers, who are more overtly sexy in a conventional sense but mentally and emotionally vacant, I think that much of the reason that Elizabeth casts such a spell over so many of us is not due just to looks alone but to the fact that we sense a fundamental intelligence in her. The brain, too, is an erogenous zone!

reply

[deleted]

Her character would have been 21 (i assume) as she was openly drinking beer

http://twitter.com/superman_7731

reply

No one under 21 has ever drunk beer?

reply

[deleted]

I dont think we were supposed to fell bad for looking at her. She was cleaning a house. Not running around in her underwear. and they do look great

Check out more movie reviews
http://www.youtube.com/cauwel3

reply

[deleted]

oh, OK, I guess that means no one has ever done it.

reply

[deleted]

Love your tagline, Naked Fear!

reply

oh! I thought no one would actually POST about it.. but yeah.. I thought the same thing as the OP

I was like NICE CLEAVAGE.. ESPECIALLY during the shots it showed her bending over and facing the camera! :)

I was staring at them almost every chance I got! One of the few reasons I'm going to buy the DVD! :)

reply

her boobs were the greatest distractions I've witnessed in a film in a loooooong time.

reply

But the poster named therealman made an interesting point. I wish he would go into it more. The boobs were generally filmed from the angle that Sarah's abusers would have been at.

reply

wait a second, is that really true? and do you watch a lot of movies, like 20 a year or more? man, i might have to watch this movie just so i can look and stare and salivate over her boobs!

reply

you should buy it on blue ray, or burn a copy of the blu ray because blu ray movies look sooo much better and clearer than dvd movies. do you have a blu ray player?

reply

she was great

reply

Well then it failed. If the actress had been 13 instead of 23, that would have done it.

reply

We weren't the only ones looking at her boobs. At 19:01 the father also takes a peak and gets busted.
At 19:02 when he turns his head you can see a little smile as if he was thinking "totally worth it".
Check it out.


Bloody Mary, full of vodka, blessed
are you among cocktails.

reply

I was impressed. They could have worked like an old trampoline in the back yard or something just for extra effect, otherwise, bravo.

reply

Ah, to be a desperate pubescent boy who gets a boner from the word "vagina" again!

A bit of cleavage from B cups boobs isnt "nice boobs", ehich hopefully you'll learn all about when you've hit your mid-late 40s and get out in the world.

I love Jesus AND Jesus-hating atheists and am 100% proud!

reply

"was anybody eles thinking man at least her boobs have made this movie some what watchable..."

Yes, her breasts were the only thing entertaining or remotely interesting about this terrible film. The twist ending was the worst one I've ever come across. This is probably the worst horror movie I have ever seen, and I hate to say that, since I loved "Open Water" (and actually saw that in the theater the very first night of its general release).

This movie is garbage!

Nice breasts, though.

reply

They did look very nice.

reply

I could not tell you if it was a good movie or not as i was so distracted by the magnificent display of boobage.
They were frikken schhhhhweet.

reply

The one who is not a twin has the best looking set of "Twins"!!

Shame she didn't have a twin with similar "Twins"!!

reply