MovieChat Forums > Diana (2013) Discussion > One thing that was rather off...

One thing that was rather off...

posted 9 years ago by Coryraisa
15 replies | jump to latest

One thing that was rather off about this film and about Diana’s depiction...when she and Hasnat are walking down the hospital corridor discussing their families.

Diana appears to "hate" families; she cynically adds ...and incredibly annoying... or something to that effect.

Hasnat then brags Perhaps I've been luckier than you have...

Diana then says with a sort of bitter irony I have two families...how lucky is that?

That scene make her appear to hate her entire family.

Then in a later scene when she and Hasnat are in the park about to break up and Diana's weeping and carrying on.

She wails that she's "never been" accepted by "any family" and indicts her birth family and the one she married into.

She screeches some tirade about being rejected her "entire" life and how all these doors have closed on her.

The film probably did this for the fun of drama, but it went overboard in making it seem like "all" of Diana’s family experiences were allegedly oh-so-horrible.

Sure, Diana’s parents divorced and all and there was a bit of alcoholism with some of the members of the Spencer clan, but Diana LOVED her siblings, parents, and grandmother dearly and also grew to LOVE her stepmum and stepgrandmum as well.

Even with the family she married into...true many of them, including Charles were dysfunctional and were not very loving, but Diana never really hated them either.

By the last couple of years of her life, she has no more hard feelings towards the rest of the Royal family...in her famous November 1995 interview, she indirectly wishes them well.

Let's also not forget the MANY HAPPY times Diana had with the family she created...her two sons!

We all know that she had MANY, MANY HAPPY, VERY POSITIVE family experiences with her two sons, as she often attested to and as her now-grown sons attest to today.

Diana says this in her interview...she doesn't need a man in her life to "make" her happy; she directly said that she had her outreach work, LOYAL FRIENDS (she was NOT the lone waif that the film erroneously portrayed her as), and her two boys to fulfill her.

Also...Diana often took her sons to visit their mum in Scotland near the sea during holidays and the four of them had MANY great times there.

Let's also not forget how Diana absolutely WEPT when her father died in 1992...definitely not the actions of a woman who "hated" her family.

Those of us paying attention that March of 1992 remember how she left a ski holiday to come to prepare for her beloved dad's funeral and to loan her loving support to her stepmum and siblings.

Many of us who paid attention saw the pics of a weeping Diana and ALL (not just some) of her siblings walking close in solidarity and offering each other silent moral support.

So those parts of the film of Diana supposedly having all-bitter family experiences are FALSE.

[–] SteverB 9 years ago

First, too many words to express a lone point.

Second, she was talking about the Windsors and her broken family, not ALL families. She was giving the impression that she hated all families as a defence mechanism against never feeling part of a "real" family.

[–] Coryraisa 9 years ago

Second, she was talking about the Windsors and her broken family, not ALL families. She was giving the impression that she hated all families as a defence mechanism against never feeling part of a "real" family.

Diana's family was not "broken"...divorced parents do not equal a "broken" family.

It was the FILM that gave the FALSE impression the Diana was allegedly bitter about families.

Diana actually hinted in her November 1995 interview that despite her parents' divorce and some turmoil from that, she has many happy memories of her siblings and herself having many good times together and feeling a kinship with her siblings.

It was her siblings along with some of her dearest friends that she entrusted to help look after her sons in the event of her premature death.

[–] lrdcharlton 9 years ago

Her relations between family members on BOTH side were not in good condition in the last years of her life. What good relations and support she had with the Royal family was nonexistant after the panorama interview. Basically every member wrote her off for that, Princess Margaret especially, who got along well with Diana even after the separation. Her brother had refused her asylum at althrop and she wasn't on speaking terms with her mother,directly because of Hasnet. Her grandmother Lady fermoy, was more loyal to the Windsors more than her own children. So when her actions alienated almost all her family members she would not have had a positive view on family.

[–] Coryraisa 9 years ago

Her relations between family members on BOTH side were not in good condition in the last years of her life.

And where did you get this from? The tabloids?

I know the tabloids loved to depict Diana as "hating" her "entire" family.

Sooo...how do you explain that her siblings and mum were ALL at her funeral opening grieving for her?

I guess you missed Diana's mum weeping, kissing her daughter's casket and praying I give my Diana back to God and also opening THANKING God for giving her Diana as a daughter????

I guess you also don't realize that the Queen (yep, Prince Fool Charles' own mum) commissioned a memorial park in honor of Diana.

Hardly the actions of family members who allegedly had poor relationships with Diana during the last couple of years of Diana's life.

What good relations and support she had with the Royal family was nonexistant after the panorama interview. Basically every member wrote her off for that, Princess Margaret especially, who got along well with Diana even after the separation.

Again...tabloid fables and movie misconception.

SOME of the Palace members threw tantrums over her interview and I understand that Prince Fool Charles himself threw a huge tantrum where he broke several china plates and a picture and the frame.

And yes, several of Philip's yes-men spat evil mutterings about Diana’s interview along with a few of Prince Fool Charles' stooges.

But despite tabloid hearsay and folklore, not every single member of the Royal family turned against Diana for the interview...otherwise, the Queen NEVER would have helped found that memorial park in Diana’s honor.

Her brother had refused her asylum at althrop...

Once again, mostly tabloid fiction created for the "entertainment" for the drama addicts.

Diana, even after her separation, had resources of her own and did NOT "need" her brother or anyone else to "give" her shelter.

Can you actually imagine dignified Diana coming over to her brother's place and asking Can you give me a place to stay after I separate from Charles?

Her brother did loosely offer her one of the Althorpe places and she considered it so she and her sons could be close to Chas.

But the media attention she was too often hounded with gave her second thoughts and she later told her brother she had other places she could retreat to especially once she knew she had a secure, quiet place at Kensington Palace.

Chas, although he was tactful enough not to say anything, was rather relieved as he too began to be concerned about possible media intrusion into his place and own backyard.

Perceptive Diana saw this unspoken relief and it made her rather sad, but she too never said anything out loud...she and her brother understood each other.

Despite tabloid drama fables, Diana quietly moved into Kensington Palace that December of 1992, went up to the school and gently told her sons about the separation, she and her sons quietly wept into each other's arms, but carried on with a quiet dignity without much noise or drama.

...and she wasn't on speaking terms with her mother, directly because of Hasnet.

It was her mum who kissed Diana's casket and prayed...she thanked God for giving her Diana...hardly a woman who was "not on speaking terms" with her daughter, was it now?

Her grandmother Lady fermoy, was more loyal to the Windsors more than her own children.

So when her actions alienated almost all her family members she would not have had a positive view on family.

Diana's family didn't agree on everything and yes, like MOST families, had their share of fights, disagreements, and bickerings over the years, but in the grand scheme of things, Diana truly LOVED her family...her siblings, her parents, her stepmum, her grandparents, and stepgrandmum, and her aunts and cousins and ESPECIALLY her BELOVED sons.

It hurt Diana when the tabloids and similar rags printed negative things about Diana’s family.

I think this false depiction of Diana allegedly "hating" her own family and being "bitter" about them would really hurt Diana.

Even Prince Fool Charles' family...despite her shock and distress at the cold detachment within most of the Windsor clan and despite the pain SOME of the Palace members caused her, she still cared about them.

If you visit YouTube and listen CAREFULLY to Diana’s REAL interview, NEVER once does she express any hard feelings or hatred towards ANYONE, not even her ex-husband or towards Bimbomilla.

In fact, she indirectly wishes them well since even as early as that quiet November interview, she knew Prince Fool Charles was planning to marry Bimbomilla as soon as the divorce became final.

True that Diana didn't want the divorce and it made her very sad, but deep down inside, had accepted that divorce with Prince Fool Charles was inevitable.

Diana was a loving woman who valued families, including her own...and she was also a sharp, intuitive lady who had keen, perceptive insight into people and knew what they were likely to do next.

[–] lrdcharlton 9 years ago

I only read a few lines and decided to call it quits. So I will keep this short.
1. You seem to be a bit delusional and blind to what Diana was really like and how she was thought of by her family.
2.The useless links you supplied do not work, but if they did work they were still useless. If you believe everything she say's, then you truly are the fool I suspect you to be. Diana is known to not tell the truth and mold things to make herself come out looking good, and it didn't work on people that have any reasonable intelligence.
3. Also, when you say things like bimbomilla, your credibility(what little you have) is questionable because it shows that you opinion is warped. The evidence yo give is flimsy at best, and you never directly address an issue with relevant answers. For example

...and she wasn't on speaking terms with her mother, directly because of Hasnet.

It was her mum who kissed Diana's casket and prayed...she thanked God for giving her Diana...hardly a woman who was "not on speaking terms" with her daughter, was it now?

What has that got anything to do with the status of there relationship before she died? She was her mother and Diana died, she was sad she died. How does this invalidate what I said ? Because her family was sad, therefore the relationship between them was just peachy? Her mother admitted they were on the outs, so you answer along with every other answer is pure BS. It's somewhat comical that you speak in a self-assured manner, yet you give nothing to validate it. They were sad at her funeral, how else would they act? should they have spit on her coffin to show that things weren't good beforehand?

4. I'm not trying to be mean, but something about you just seems a little off, like a mental disorder. The way you speak, you come across like you know these people personally. It just a little weird how defensive you are of Diana and refuse to see her with a objective eye.Perhaps you just need a new hobby.

[–] Coryraisa 9 years ago

I only read a few lines and decided to call it quits. So I will keep this short.

Funny you're unable to read my entire post and THINK for a change, so you're firing back this poorly thought-out "short" response.

Very mature...something Charles would do...and often used to do with Diana.

You seem to be a bit delusional and blind to what Diana was really like and how she was thought of by her family.

Oh....? Did you happen to know Diana personally???

Do you know her family personally and they had you over for tea and allegedly told you personally what they thought of Diana?????

Or is this another tabloid fancy that you desperately wish were true?

Are you just HOPING that Diana's own siblings all "hated" her?

The useless links you supplied do not work, but if they did work they were still useless.

The one I left up is a working link.

Do us all a favor and EDUCATE yourself on this fine humanitarian, mother, Royal, ambassador, and most of all HERO.

I suspect you're jealous of this fine lady because you don't have her intelligence and raw courage.

Try walking the dangerous landmines under the hot African sun as this sweet, mousy, timid, quiet lady did...then try to disparage this humanitarian.

And mind you, Diana was a freckled, FAIR-complexioned lady who carried no umbrella under that blazing tropical sun.

Oh and don't TRY to regurgitate the laughable tripe that Diana "only" did it for media attention because with her high status and title, she could have gained positive media attention in MANY other, less risky ways rather than risk her long, skinny legs in that perilous field.

Not to mention that she did much, if not MOST of her outreach work back home with NO media present at all.

Are you afraid that my points might...gasp...have some validity?

Is that why you're so afraid to read the transcript to Diana's poignant, touching, quiet interview???

Are you afraid to see the human being that Diana was rather than this villain that you're fancying her as????

If you believe everything she say's, then you truly are the fool I suspect you to be.

And you're truly the immature, mentally limited fool I suspect you are if you blindly believe the common tabloid folklore on Diana.

Diana is known to not tell the truth and mold things to make herself come out looking good, and it didn't work on people that have any reasonable intelligence.

Are you confusing her with her ex-husband here?

It was that ex-husband of hers who lied and bribed his stooges at the Palace to lie to the media and public for him so he'd come out looking good and have his ex-wife appearing "unbalanced" and "unstable."

And with Charles, his efforts to sabotage Diana's reputation backfired because MOST intelligent people, especially the THINKING public knew it was Charles behind the tabloid fictions...and it backfired in his face big-time.

If Diana lied, she was mature and courageous enough to do her own dirty work and it was to protect her loved ones...and she had MANY loved ones in her life, much as you detest admitting.

Also, when you say things like bimbomilla, your credibility (what little you have) is questionable because it shows that you opinion is warped.

Funny because your quoting the tabloid fables and folklore causes your own credibility to be questionable also.

The evidence yo give is flimsy at best, and you never directly address an issue with relevant answers...

Well, dear, read that interview transcript...hardly "flimsy" evidence at all of the truly remarkable, intelligent human being Diana was.

All of the "evidence" that "yo" tossing out there I've seen in the tabloids and never in any CREDIBLE source...which shows that your alleged "evidence" of Diana allegedly being this horrid "villain" who was supposedly universally "hated" by her "entire" family is pure fiction that you've blindly and UNintelligently ripped off the tabloids.

What has that got anything to do with the status of there relationship before she died? She was her mother and Diana died, she was sad she died. How does this invalidate what I said?

Because you were claiming that supposedly Diana and her mum allegedly disowned each other.

If your tales were true, Frances would have NEVER kissed her daughter's casket, wept so many tears, or said the lovely things out loud.

Frances would have been sad, but would have just sat at the funeral or maybe just stood at the casket a few minutes and maybe sniffed some but that would have been it.

Because her family was sad, therefore the relationship between them was just peachy?

No, I never said all was peachy or perfect between the Spencers.

Like I stated in my earlier comment that you didn't bother reading because you got all huffy and bent out of shape...like MOST families, I am sure the Spencer clan had their share of squabbles over the years.

I understand that Chas and Johnnie bickered every so often and sometimes Diana's sisters and her brother sometimes were competitive and Raine Spencer sometimes grated on the nerves of all the Spencer siblings...but when the chips were down, they were all there for each other.

Do take a look at pics and clips of Earl Johnnie Spencer's funeral...all four of the Spencer siblings were there and standing in solidarity.

Diana was weeping...often times really hard, but she AND her sons were there and Diana's siblings held Diana from time to time, sometimes shedding their own tears.

And dear Diana reached out to her equally devastated stepmum...true, her siblings were initially taken aback, but they came round also.

Despite Raine's sometimes getting on their nerves, the Spencers did love Raine deep down inside and were NOT going to just abandon her in her grief.

Her mother admitted they were on the outs, so you answer along with every other answer is pure BS.

Oh.....? Did you personally meet Frances Spencer and she told you this....?

Or is this more fictional BS of yours that you've pulled out of the tabloid pages?

If Diana was allegedly so "alienated" from her mum, how do you explain that Diana took her sons there often during school holidays and stayed herself and said that she considered the Scottish island that her mum lived in one of her safe havens?

I hardly think that the introverted, shy Diana would retreat with her sons for holidays on an island with a woman she supposedly was "on the outs" with.

And as you conveniently ignore, Diana and her beloved sons were a WONDERFUL family themselves...she would not have been the wonderful mother that she was if she'd had no positive family experiences to draw from and had been supposedly bitter about families.

Let's see if "you" answer to this question is something that is NOT parroted from the smut rags.

It's somewhat comical that you speak in a self-assured manner, yet you give nothing to validate it.

It's actually hilarious that you boast of allegedly "knowing" all this about Diana and her family as if you've spoken to them directly, yet every single one of your tales I've seen in the tabloids.

Not to mention that you haven't posted a SINGLE credible, NON-tabloid link.

I'm really laughing here.

They were sad at her funeral, how else would they act? Should they have spit on her coffin to show that things weren't good beforehand?

Of course not...how silly. Of course, most of us know they would have shown proper sober stances.

But they would NOT have been as openly tearful as they were either nor would they have been standing so firmly by Diana's beloved sons.

Wills was ready to faint and sedated, yet it was mostly Chas who got him through the funeral and who was practically holding Wills up at times.

And Chas was one of the ones who spoke so passionately at the ceremony...hardly the mark of a brother who allegedly tossed his sister out on her skinny little bum.

Oh and guess who stopped that greedy crook Buttbrain Burrell, Diana's former butler from stealing Diana's personal belongings and valuable jewelry to sell?

Diana's LOYAL siblings...they came back from the burial just in time to catch that corrupt ex-butler ripping pages right out of Diana's journal of her dreams to sell to the tabloids to cash in on those horrible "murder" lies...another set of tabloid fictions that were starting to circulate.

Despite their grieving, they grabbed the Buttbrain and tossed his pathetic, greedy arse right out of Diana's bedroom and out of Diana's home and changed the locks immediately to protect their beloved sister's possessions from further theft.

Most definitely not the actions of siblings who allegedly "hated" their sister.

Of course, that troll Burrell tried to retaliate by selling the tabloids not only the "murder plot" lies by pretending that Diana's page was a "note to" him, but also claiming that Diana's siblings were the alleged thieves.

Thankfully, that backfired in the Buttbrain's face and he ended up serving a bit of prison time for theft.

And Diana's siblings also helped look after Diana's then almost-grown sons as they had promised Diana in the event of her premature death.

I'm not trying to be mean, but something about you just seems a little off, like a mental disorder. The way you speak, you come across like you know these people personally.

Funny, I was thinking the same thing about you.

You speak as if you personally "know" Diana's siblings and mum and they allegedly "told" you all this.

Thankfully, I've seen all these fables in the tabloids and even recycled from time to time so I know you're just ripping your stories out of the tabloid fiction pages.

The tales really do make interesting A/U fanfiction and actually are an amusing read.

It just a little weird how defensive you are of Diana and refuse to see her with a objective eye.

Perhaps you just need a new hobby.

I think you're the one who can't see the real Diana objectively.

Disparaging this fine lady is hardly "objective" at all.

Perhaps you should write fanfiction about the Royals, including Diana...then you can indulge your fantasies of this villain!Diana and these A/U Spencers that then all "hate" Diana.

[–] lrdcharlton 9 years ago

After skimming over your bizarre rant about I am now solidly convinced you are a bit funny in the head.....but rather entertaining in a pathetic way.

Very mature...something Charles would do...and often used to do with Diana.

Yeah, becuae you grew up around him right?

Do us all a favor and EDUCATE yourself on this fine humanitarian, mother, Royal, ambassador, and most of all HERO.

Us? oh, I see, the us in your head.

And mind you, Diana was a freckled, FAIR-complexioned lady who carried no umbrella under that blazing tropical sun.

are you afraid that my points might...gasp...have some validity?

Is that why you're so afraid to read the transcript to Diana's poignant, touching, quiet interview???

Are you afraid to see the human being that Diana was rather than this villain that you're fancying her as????


I'm afraid that you will have a mental break when whatever ailment you suffer from finally allows you to reflect on your life and relise your not Diana or her family's friend and it was all in your head.
But seriously, What drugs are you on? DO you not relise how you sound? I am showing my co-workers your reply and they are laughing at you. I cannot take you seriously and I know it's not nice to make fun of the mentally disabled but your material is very funny. Oh by the way, Diana was a spiteful, immature air head who didn't even finish high school and spread her legs to anyone who smiled at her.Without marrying into the House of Windsor she would still be in obscurity and married and divorced even younger as she would not have been in the spotlight. She could have made her life turn out better and would still be alive if she had brains. Thats all. 

[–] Coryraisa 9 years ago

I'm afraid that you will have a mental break when whatever ailment you suffer from finally allows you to reflect on your life and relise your not Diana or her family's friend and it was all in your head.

LOL!!!! You were claiming to be "finished" here, but it's clear that "your" still at it with your rants.



And my dear, YOU also are NOT a friend nor do you know Diana's family or Diana at all nor have you risked leg and life in the landmine fields the way Diana risked her scrawny little legs.

But seriously, What drugs are you on? Do you not relise how you sound? I am showing my co-workers your reply and they are laughing at you. I cannot take you seriously and I know it's not nice to make fun of the mentally disabled but your material is very funny.

Funny because I showed a few colleagues and friends your insipid nonsense and we all had a good laugh at your silly drivel.

I guess you don't "relise" how you appear also, especially since you have delusions of allegedly being oh-so-knowledgeable yet your grammar is pockmarked with misspellings and other errors that are common in ten-year-old children still in primary school

I suspect you are a ten-year-old in primary school year five PRETENDING to be an adult and pretending to "know" Diana and her family.

Oh by the way, Diana was a spiteful, immature air head who didn't even finish high school and spread her legs to anyone who smiled at her.

So was Prince Fool Charles who spread his legs to any female who flattered him...he also was a spiteful, immature airhead who is now miserably married to another vacant-head, Camvainmilla or other.

Word has it from several reliable sources that Prince Fool Charles has secretly separated from his current wife and they live in separate apartments in the Clarence House.

Because they cannot afford the bad publicity of another divorce or public scandal, they have no other option but to keep their marital misery under wraps and put on a fine act of being this "happy couple" in public, especially at events and engagements.

Prince Fool Charles was even stupid enough to be duped by the corrupt Reagans' superficial charm while Diana was not; with good reason, Diana was secretly terrified of the Reagans back in the 1980s.

So much for your "objectivity" regarding Diana, not to mention that the British do not have "high school"; they have secondary school, which Diana did complete...and unlike you, she went out and WORKED after she completed secondary school; she was NOT some idle aristocrat sitting at either of her parents' houses waiting for some man to support her.

Oh, in she also actually continued taking several individual classes even if she did not attend a full university; she took classes in cooking, skiing, child management, psychology, and the arts.

Without marrying into the House of Windsor she would still be in obscurity and married and divorced even younger as she would not have been in the spotlight. She could have made her life turn out better and would still be alive if she had brains. That's all.

Maybe she wouldn't have been famous, but she certainly would have had much more peace and I think if she'd had access to information on her trait of high sensitivity, she would have been more selective in choosing her husband and would have avoided not only the heartbreak of a divorce, but the public humiliation of having it splashed on the front pages of what an airhead she truly married.

Diana might have died prematurely and yes, would have lived had she made a better choice of a husband and a bodyguard, but that fool ex-husband of hers would NOT have gotten himself embroiled in the scandals that earned him so much bad press and would be much happier today.

In an issue of Time magazine a few Octobers ago and on a couple of Yahoo websites, Prince Fool Charles' secret bitterness and immaturity leaked.

In the Time article, Prince Fool complained copiously about himself being the "forgotten prince," badmouthed his own son, Wills and Kate and her family as "frivolous," then blamed his OWN mother (look who's bitter about family) for his not being crowned king yet, grumbling that the Queen was "chucking out" a "jewel" along with "rubbish."

If Prince Fool Charles had any brain in that head of his, he would have NOT put out that silly article for Time and would be thanking his lucky stars for having the wonderful first wife and the two sons he was fortunate enough to have in his life....but unlike his former wife, he's the one with no appreciation for his own family.

Prince Fool Charles also embarrassed his family and the Palace not to mention his own country by getting into a catfight with Russian president Vladmir Putin a couple of years ago also...also something he would have avoided if he had ANY intelligence.

So much for your "objectivity" or "keeping it short," dearie.



[–] lrdcharlton 9 years ago

LOL!!!! You were claiming to be "finished" here, but it's clear that "your" still at it with your rants.

And my dear, YOU also are NOT a friend nor do you know Diana's family or Diana at all nor have you risked leg and life in the landmine fields the way Diana risked her scrawny little legs.

I find you to be somewhat amusing but you really need to tone it down a little. I feel very embarrassed for you. The more you write the worse you look. "She walked through a mine field with her scrawny little legs?" Who the füÇk writes like that?

So was Prince Fool Charles who spread his legs to any female who flattered him...he also was a spiteful, immature airhead who is now miserably married to another vacant-head, Camvainmilla or other.

Prince Fool Charles was even stupid enough to be duped by the corrupt Reagans' superficial charm while Diana was not; with good reason, Diana was secretly terrified of the Reagans back in the 1980s.

Omg. you freaking retard. You write the most of the wall sh!t I have ever seen.

Funny because I showed a few colleagues and friends your insipid nonsense and we all had a good laugh at your silly drivel.

I guess you don't "relise" how you appear also, especially since you have delusions of allegedly being oh-so-knowledgeable yet your grammar is pockmarked with misspellings and other errors that are common in ten-year-old children still in primary school

I suspect you are a ten-year-old in primary school year five PRETENDING to be an adult and pretending to "know" Diana and her family.

I am absolutely shocked! YOU have a job? Well I have seen special needs individuals with jobs, so I suppose you could have one too.I am calling bs on you as I doubt you showed your co-worker anything being that you are very transparent, so I heavily suspect your lying. But if you indeed showed Co-workers anything , they were most likely laughing at you. You talk about Diana and her family in such a bizarre tone that I think you have some learning disabilities. You refer to Camilla as Camvainmilla, and Charles as Prince Fool Charles, and your accusing me of being a 10th grader? What adult resorts to childish names like that. What name do you have for the Queen Mother? Queen Evil-stepmother or Big Bad Old Lady? The pure irony of your words, insipid nonsense? drivel? THAT DESCRIBES YOU MORON PERFECTLY!

I love how you trash Prince Charles, but you beloved Diana was no better. The whore slept with married men a ruined more than one marriage. But in her interview it was "there were three of use in the marriage" should have been more like 7 or 8.

Well I got my laughs,
good day to you weirdo

[–] Coryraisa 9 years ago

I find you to be somewhat amusing but you really need to tone it down a little. I feel very embarrassed for you.

The more you write the worse you look. “She walked through a mine field with her scrawny little legs?” Who the füÇk writes like that?

Somebody who appreciates Diana as the special person she truly was from her little skinny legs to her huge, hooked, freckled nose to her luminous, soulful eyes to her huge heart right through to her sensitive soul.

OMG. You freaking retard. You write the most of the wall sh!t I have ever seen.

LOL! Now look who's resorting to immature name-calling.

I am absolutely shocked!
YOU have a job?

Yep...a counselor...my colleagues and I find you an interesting case study right along with Prince Fool Charles and Camvainmilla.

I am calling BS on you as I doubt you showed your co-worker anything being that you are very transparent, so I heavily suspect your lying.

But if you indeed showed co-workers anything, they were most likely laughing at you.

We all are enjoying a good laugh at
YOU. You talk about Diana and her family in such a bizarre tone.

Better "bizarre" and imaginative "off-the-wall sh!t" than just stupidly parroting the tabloid fictions like you do.

You refer to Camilla as Camvainmilla, and Charles as Prince Fool Charles, and your accusing me of being a 10th grader?

I think you're (“your” American, anyone?) American, dearie and confused about our school system.

I stated that your level of writing appears to be that of a ten-YEAR-old child...not a tenth-“grader.”

I believe in your school system, most American ten-YEAR-old children would be in fourth or fifth “grade.”

What adult resorts to childish names like that.

An immature one like you...since you call those who disagree with you "retarded" and shriek that "your" (I can see you’re unable to tell the difference between the words your versus you’re...very common error in children your age) this and that and all.

What name do you have for the Queen Mother? Queen Evil-stepmother or Big Bad Old Lady?

Actually, the only ones truly idiotic enough are Prince Fool Charles, his moronic wife, Camvainmilla, and Philip Imbecile.

The Queen Mum was much more dignified and not a fool like her grandson...in fact, the Queen and the Queen Mum found Charles’ misconduct and adultery very embarrassing…and today, the Queen is fed up with both Charles and Camvainmilla's silly nonsensical dramas.

THAT DESCRIBES YOU MORON PERFECTLY!

LOL! Now look who's resorting to childish name-calling? You truly sound like a ten or twelve-year-old TRYING to pass off as an adult and failing miserably.

It would be better if you just admit that you're ("your?") still a kid probably in primary school and stop faking adulthood...your writing style and childish indignation reveal your true age.

I love how you trash Prince Charles, but you beloved Diana was no better.

And I find it hilarious how you trash Diana and call her a “whore” while Charles was NO better.

And don’t even TRY the laughable piffle that Prince Fool Charles was "innocently" sleeping with "only one" other woman and that Diana was allegedly bedding down with a "dozen" other men because most of us know Charles had SEVERAL mistresses.

He just was more adept at keeping his adultery hidden than Diana, who was open and honest about her mistakes.

Charles was also a better liar, an actor, and more used to making excuses for himself than Diana ever was.

The whore slept with married men a ruined more than one marriage.

And Prince Fool Charles the whore also ruined two marriages, maybe more...Camvainmilla was NOT his only mistress "a" NOT his “true love” as many tabloids fictitiously claim.

Charles also was a well-known womanizer as a teenager and in his twenties…Camvainmilla was not even his first "love"...part of the reason Charles' parents were urging him to marry by thirty-two was that his reputation for his dating and sleeping around half of the English aristocracy was becoming a public embarrassment.

Charles almost caused a public scandal right before his wedding to Diana by being seen on the Royal train with one of his mistresses, possibly Camvainmilla (who was a married woman by then).

Poor Diana caught wind of this story and it had her in tears just a few short days before the wedding.

And as Diana admitted, one of her early errors was ignoring the uneasy feeling this red flag from Charles' behavior intuitively gave her in her stomach and heart and going through with the wedding.

Diana’s affairs came WELL AFTER their 1992 separation "a" AFTER Charles’ affairS (note that I use the plural form…Camvainmilla was NOT his “only” mistress or his “true love” much as she fancies herself to be) were publicly exposed…even with Hewitt, despite his fantasies and lies, things never became deep with them until after 1992.

Even if Diana had ever slept with any married men, the men ruined their own marriages…Diana is NOT to blame for these men’s cheating on their wives.

Or are you one of those backwards imbeciles who falsely believes that the woman is "always" to blame for a marriage failing?

But in her interview it was “there were three of use in the marriage” should have been more like 7 or 8.

Yeah, it should have been...sensitive Diana was crushed enough just talking about ONE of her fool of an ex-husband’s mistresses...it was too painful for her to discuss Prince Fool Charles’ other mistresses.

Just see the way her huge, luminous, sad eyes brimmed with tears when she talked about even ONE of her ex-husband’s affairs.

The reason we often hear more about Diana’s mistakes and flings than her fool of an ex-husband’s is that unlike Charles, Diana ADMITTED and owned up to her mistakes without blaming others...while Charles tried to cover his mistakes and wasted lots of time blaming others for his actions.

The only reason Charles admitted his affair with Camvainmilla was because he’d finally been caught and exposed and so had NO other option but to admit to it.

Image-conscious Charles tried very hard to put on the act of this “serious, innocent” long-suffering husband of an “unbalanced, unstable” wife.

Also, while Diana was willing to say things with straight to our faces without any third party carrying messages, Charles masked his lies and slander behind staff and “friends” doing his dirty work in slandering his ex-wife FOR him instead of having the decency to come out and say it straight to our faces.

Now today, Charles continues his stupidity, this time indirectly slandering Wills and Kate...see an issue of Time magazine from a few Octobers ago when Charles laments himself being this allegedly “forgotten prince” and bemoans being “chucked”...he even hints that his own mum is to blame for his not being worshipped worldwide.

Also Charles got himself into a silly, immature catfight with Vladmir Putin a couple of years ago and brought more embarrassment and scandal onto the Royal family…that was on Yahoo news, not any tabloid. See these reliable sources...

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-27515086

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-27558825

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/prince-charles/10845309/Prince-Charles-compares-Vladimir-Putin-to-Adolf-Hitler.html

https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?p=prince+charles+versus+vladmir+putin&ei=UTF-8&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-004

Well I got my laughs...good day to you weirdo.

Me also…my friends, colleagues, and even my nieces (one is ten, about your age) and I had our laughs at your inane rantings...good day, dearie...take a Diana jog if your parents or halfway house lets you take one.

Diana is probably laughing at your nonsense from Heaven as well…despite her quiet, shy nature, she did have a good sense of humor.

[–] lrdcharlton 9 years ago

You are one crazy mofo, I don't even have to write a response to point out your stupidity as you already do a superb job of condemning yourself.It's like your a caricature of a delusional IMDB poster.It's sad your mother went against her good judgement of using a wire hanger and sparing use of your presence on this earth.

[–] Coryraisa 9 years ago

LOL!!!! You just did write out a response...not any intelligent response but one all the same that made me laugh.

The fact that you have no intelligent response is telling...you ("your," anyone?) truly are either:

An eight-year-old child in primary school...or...

...a mentally slow adult in a halfway house.

I rest my case...Diana LOVED her family...she cared about not only her sons, but her three siblings, both of her parents, her stepmum, her grandparents, her aunts and her cousins.

Wrap your little head around this one also...despite the pain her ex-husband and Camvapidmilla caused her in her life, she even cared about them and bid them well.

Do read or watch her poignant, quiet November 1995 interview...she knew even then that her soon-to-be ex-husband planned to marry the bimbo and wishes them good luck and farewell.

She never did stop caring for those two now-unhappily married bozos either.

[–] lrdcharlton 9 years ago

You are very very weird. You don't know how pathetic you look and at this point you look very sad, immature and delusional. I am being serious, think about it; what emotionally and intellectually stable adult uses words such as Camvapidmilla and Prince fool Charles? Read over your replies and think.....actually never mind you obviously don't have a clear self reflection otherwise I wouldn't be writing this if you diid. Eh whatever. Continue to look like a fool a be laughed at.

[–] Coryraisa 8 years ago

You also, Charles fangirl.

[–] Coryraisa 9 years ago

I invite you to take a look at the REAL Diana here and read her REAL interview...if you pay attention to this wonderful, rather timid, soft-spoken lady, you should see that she had NO hard feelings against anyone and did NOT go to her grave bitter or angry.

She’d found peace and by a few months after this cathartic interview, she was even finding happiness again (without latching onto another man).

Transcript of this quiet, poignant November interview:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/politics97/diana/panorama.html