She was originally meant to be in this film as Jennifer Aniston's role, but had to pass on due to scheduling conflicts. How different would the film been had she starred this instead of Aniston. Better/worse?
share[deleted]
But Rachel from Friends playing a stripper? No..Aniston was just as sterile as a cold shower in rubbing alcohol. I hated the part where she punched the daughter's boyfriend. Simple bullying. Not funny at all.
shareJennifer was sexy as ?hit, and the boyfriend was a fùcking àsshole, motherfúcker deserved it
shareTo me it seems unthinkable for Kristen Wiig to have been Rose/Sarah. But it might have worked and been as good as with Jennifer. The way the script is written they needed somebody who could pull off both the stripper part and the suburban mom part.
If Kristen Wiig had gotten the role the movie may not have been as commercially successful because of course Jennifer Aniston is the bigger name.
Jennifer looked hot as *beep* in this I just cant see how Kristen wiig could have pulled that off, not thats shes ugly or anyting but just not as sexy as Jennifer Aniston.
Libera te tu temet ex inferis.
pro ego sum diabolus, pro ego sum nex.
Kristen wigg is funny but i just don't the film would've worked if she was cast as Aniston's character. The film studio made the right decisions and hired the wright people for the roled.
shareI think Kristen Wiig is funny in some movies that I have seen her in. She is also rather attractive and I can see her pull off the role as an aging stripper-type. She also has some sex appeal in some areas. Watch her in Bridesmaids and Masterminds to see what I mean.
However, in the end, I am glad that Jennifer Aniston played that role.
All I need is one mic...