MovieChat Forums > The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills (2010) Discussion > A (kind of) personal question for older ...

A (kind of) personal question for older Women...

posted 8 years ago by zoogfan1492
12 replies | jump to latest

I have broth this up before, but I'm going to bring it up again be because this storyline is so dumb.

Have you ever found yourself in a situation where you had an outfit you were really excited about and after getting dressed looked in the mirror and realized that the getup would look so much better without underwear? or that the dress would only look good with a certain type of underwear you don't have or aren't clean? A bra even?

This situation has happened to me before (especially in white) and Im 24! I don't think these women in their 40s and 50s who have been attending white parties for years and have very expensive dresses that would be a shame to not wear could have possibly not had a couple times they went commando. I also think it is fairly easy to ACCIDENTALLY flash your vagine if your in a short dress without underwear.

This storyline is so ridiculous.

BOOM! bazooka joe. -Randy Barry of The Real World: San Dieg

[–] mindthinkr 8 years ago

Absolutely. Panty lines at my age just bring emphasis to the fact that I no longer have a pert butt due to age. My choice: thong or commando for jeans or pants. With a dress the only choice would be commando or a slip. Ha Ha, slips are rarely worn these days and I have a younger male friend who states every time that I wear one, that I am the only woman that he knows who does wear one. (Secretly I think he thinks that it's sexy, almost showing him something forbidden when he catches a glimpse when it teases beneath my hemline) I'm post M where there are no longer the worries of things showing during cycles. I know that wearing a miniskirt is over (again age and appropriateness) so it would make catching a peek of my nether area pretty much a non issue. I wear my lengths about 1-2 inches above my knees. If I feel good in an outfit I wear it with confidence aka my best accessory. If someone tries hard and for some reason does get a look well...I guess they worked hard enough to!! Am not about to let that ruin my good time.

[–] chiligirl-1 8 years ago

I'm 50, and my chubby little thighs don't allow me to wear short skirts anymore, but if I wore white pants, I would surely go pantiless. When I was in better shape and wore shorter skirts, I did as well...as do many of my friends.

This is by far the dumbest storyline yet.

Maybe poker's just not your game, Ike. I know, let's have a spelling contest.

[–] canyongirl60 8 years ago

You can wear skirts again with some spans that are like shorts.

[–] zoogfan1492 8 years ago

I don't like the word Panties. Never have. But after this season, I think were all going to feel the way about the word Panties as we felt about munchausen. Bothe of these words need to be expelled from Bravo.

BOOM! bazooka joe. -Randy Barry of The Real World: San Diego

[–] Ysis 8 years ago

I don't like the word Panties.

I don't, either. I don't know why. I also don't like "booty." Can't explain it.

Anyway, I have never, nor will I ever go without underwear.

Burn, Hollywood, Burn!- from the incomparable album Fear of a Black Planet by Public Enemy.

[–] noveltylibrary 8 years ago

I'm with you! I can't imagine going without either esp jeans, talk about uncomfortable :o

[–] kisses5050 8 years ago

Panties- is too precious it is for little girls and sounds pervie when referring to a grown woman...

anything white i have bought as been well constructed enough..lined or good fabric...that "lines" are not an issue.

my crunchy friend says underwear causes yeast infections

[–] peacockblue 8 years ago

I guess anyone who is championing "going commando" doesn't care that they are touching a mucous membrane part of their body where others are to go or have went. It's absolutely disgusting.

◘ Help control the pet population, have your pet spayed or neutered ◘

[–] Karma-For-You 8 years ago

It is kind of gross. I imagine all of the bacteria that was on the chair, just waiting to crawl up Erika's hoo ha. Ugh. Ever since I saw a 20/20 episode where they showed all of the disgusting things that are on hotel bedspreads, nothing outside of my home is going to touch my bare bottom region.

[–] taopolis 8 years ago

I imagine all of the bacteria that was on the chair, just waiting to crawl up Erika's hoo ha.

I'm confused. Was Erika's bare bottom touching the chair? Also, anotomically speaking, how can her vagina touch the chair? That could only happen if her genitals are where her ass should be, right? But also, wasn't she still wearing a skirt? I don't think any bare flesh was touching the furniture. Maybe I missed that.

[–] 8 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Juliegirlj4 8 years ago

I agree-as a germaphobe I would never wear a short skirt or dress with no underpants. I usually wear Spanx, or some type of supportive underwear, as I find they are less visible than even a thong.

When standing, Erika's dress looked to barely cover her ass, so it stands to reason that when sitting, her crotch, or near crotch may have made contact with whatever she was sitting on.

That being said, I think the entire incident is stupid, and is being blown way out of proportion. As far as PK catching a glimpse of Erika's lady parts- I don't think he is at fault. The fault lies with him blabbing that he got an eyeful.

I just wonder how differently things may have been if Tom Girardi had been with Erika. She may not have even worn that dress, and even if she did, PK may not have felt so free to gawk. LOL!