MovieChat Forums > The Revenant (2016) Discussion > A bit too much over the top

A bit too much over the top


The cinematography was great it had some great sequences and some absolutely ridiculous sequences. It's like they tried to stick everything they could into the story as if the real survival story wasn't enough.

No f-ing way the character is going to survive a float no less down an ice cold river, that is stretching it way too much for me. He would lose dexterity in under two minutes.

"Cold water carries heat away from the body 25 times faster than air of the same temperature and as a result, the body core immediately begins to lose heat to the outside environment. At first, the body tries to generate more heat by shivering, but this is not enough to offset the loss of heat to the water. Within 20 to 30 minutes, depending on water temperature, body core temperature drops to below 35° C (95° F) cognitive functioning and judgement become affected"

I read an account of Simon Kenton who during the winter fell in the Ohio or Allegheny, he was barely able to crawl up the bank and get some kindling lit to build a small fire, he stripped naked and used a hide to make a small tipi enclosing it around himself and the fire to survive.

But then they sure do a 180 when he guts the horse to use its body for protection from the cold, there they make it seem like it's life or death when in reality the water would have been much worse.

When he escapes from the indians on the pinto sequence he first shoots a warrior approaching him with a flintlock, then after mounting up and galloping away he shoots a brave off a horse with the same flintlock, never reloaded.

When he's catching fish he's got a nice fire going on the bank it takes about a minute or two to cook a fish but he eats it raw. lol.

I also scratched my head when they abandoned the protection of the keel boat, it could move it was solid cover and it had a swivel gun. Then every time they head for civilization they head upstream or up river or head into the mountains WTF?

The indians that find the spot where Hugh's son was killed, didn't see the drag marks in the snow where Hugh left tracks.

Cinematography 10/10 story 6/10. Makes me want to see Man In The Wilderness again now.

reply

You picky bastard. Just turn off your brain and enjoy the sights.

Why are you here if you haven't seen the movie yet?

reply

i picked up on all those points you made, and a few more. But as someone else pointed out, don't let a few discrepencies ruin your enjoyment of an awesome movie

reply

The Revenant is a masterpiece.

reply

katyhun...can you just please *beep* off from every damn thread and write this crap...no The revenant isnt a masterpiece in any way...its a really good movie for sure but its no 10 on the rating scale so please just stfu and go drown yourself...I bet you even are a lame retarded studioplant, a *beep* annoying one...

~If the realistic details fails, the movie fails~

reply

Aww leave her alone. And if thats katyhuns real avatar, hands off, she's mine!

reply

It is a masterpiece son.

reply

I could see leaving the boat. They would be sitting ducks and no cover. No place to run to. Just a straight line.


Horse poop, If you know what that real country looks like you wouldn't make that statement, the real Missouri is wide, they could easily get out of effective rifle range, and the the uneven country (that's why they call it The Breaks) would make it impossible to try and follow the keelboat.

If you looked at a typical keelboat you see it has gunwales that you could hide behind which would be "cover". http://www.history.army.mil/lc/the%20mission/keelboatphotos/Keelboat0009.JPG

reply

[deleted]

Sure the stream looked pretty narrow, it probably wouldn't have even floated a real keelboat, they didn't shoot it on the Missouri where it actually took place. Your mixing reality with Hollywood movie fantasy. It's was just a convienient plot point to advance their version of the story, get it?

reply

[deleted]

And I said the real story took place on the Missouri River, not some NARROW and SHALLOW mountain stream GET IT, the facts on the screen are BOGUS, just a BS plot point.

reply

[deleted]

HOW it's presented on the screen is the reason for the original post, genius.... "A bit too much over the top"

reply

[deleted]

You saying the real story doesn't matter is horsesheet.

reply

[deleted]

We might be overlooking the notion that the movie is titled The Revenant for a reason, as well that Glass has all those strange, spiritual dreams for a reason. He perhaps has supernatural abilities, and a lot of the stuff he did to "survive" was pure habit. Let's suppose that Glass did in fact die from the wounds inflicted by the bear, along with the cold weather, and that he was resurrected as a revenant.

The indians that find the spot where Hugh's son was killed, didn't see the drag marks in the snow where Hugh left tracks.
We can all concede to that error.

reply

Yeah I thought they threw a bit too much should have killed him but somehow didn't stuff in there too. I would have liked it better if they'd devoted more time to him tracking Fitzgerald and plotting his revenge.

What are words for when no one listens anymore

reply