Have you ever read David H. Childress'......
"Giant Stone Balls"?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkbLe3oCGMc
"A stitch in time, saves your embarrassment." (RIP Ms. Penny LoBello)
Have you ever read David H. Childress'......
by Maya55555 » 5 days ago (Sun Apr 5 2015 21:55:24)
IMDb member since May 2014
"Giant Stone Balls"?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkbLe3oCGMc
Once again, you've illustrated the maturity level (read "lack of") that you're constantly bringing to this conversation.
Seriously, this latest post of yours is the stuff of grade school playgrounds.
The question at this point is...
...Have YOU ever read and REALLY considered the posts suggesting that you're only here to troll? share
WTT:
It is a joke, just like you are. Have you read AA Debunked?
"A stitch in time, saves your embarrassment." (RIP Ms. Penny LoBello)
by Maya55555 » WTT:
It is a joke, just like you are. Have you read AA Debunked?
So you're ALSO assuming I didn't know that video was intended to be a joke by whoever made it?
Got it.
That said, knowing it was a given that video was intended to be a joke, what is also a given is the juvenile maturity level you've illustrated you're working on by choosing that specific video to post here.
My question for you about reading is whether you even actually read the posts that are made here by others before you post.
I ask because you and I have already discussed the AA Debunked video at length. The fact that you're acting as if you don't recall that discussion simply has to be a joke, just like you.
share
the "Reading AA Debunked" was a joke, you were just late to realize it, so you can't use that argument to fire it back, you're still the joke, bud.
Anyway, nice to see nothing has changed here on the AA Boards :P
by DethstruXioN » the "Reading AA Debunked" was a joke, you were just late to realize it, so you can't use that argument to fire it back, you're still the joke, bud.
Anyway, nice to see nothing has changed here on the AA Boards :P
Interesting that of the two of us, it's Maya that you're willing to give the benefit of the doubt that is wasn't a mistake on his/her part...especially considering the maturity level of the video Maya posted to start this thread.
It seems you and Maya are now part of the same punch line. share
No doubt, no benefit, ive seen you discuss AA Debunked before with Maya and with me also (i was the one who started the first AA Debunked thread 2,5 years ago), besides you pointed out in your earlier post that you discussed it anyway, we all remembered it, so, what doubt are you speaking of?
The maturity youre speaking of, well, the Big Balls might be childrish, David Childrish, but theyre jokes, maybe theyre not on par with your wit and intellect, or taste... does this mean youre patrolling the boards of The Three Stooges, Ace Ventura etc, to complain about the maturity level of jokes made in the movie and board? I hope not.
The Big Balls were more a reason to assume that the " 'Reading' AA Debunked" line was a joke, plus the "reading" part made it more obvious, since we all know it as the 3 hour documentary on YT, same counts for the big balls, it was a video, you cant read those, so obviously it was a joke, maybe childish, but you decided to give your opinion about it, so thats on you.
You say "this conversation" in your first response, does that mean that this is an ongoing discussion (the same one of last year?), splintered off into a new thread?
Or do you drag your baggage to new threads, in hope for continuation, so that you dont feel obliged to go in depth.
(if not, then i dont see why this thread should connect to previous conversations, calling it "this conversation")
Dont you ever get the feeling of Deja Vu?
After all these years youre still here doing the same thing, you do realize that the IMDb community doesnt account for all the AA watchers/fans right?
Do you also go around doing this (this being, jumping on every sentence of someone debunking AA) on Twitter, Facebook or wherever people talk about it in a way that does not please you?
Wherever there are opinions, there will be opposing opinions, if you keep trying to refute or reach middle ground with everyone, youll die trying.
How much longer will you be doing this, have you found a protege yet?
by DethstruXioN » No doubt, no benefit, ive seen you discuss AA Debunked before with Maya and with me also (i was the one who started the first AA Debunked thread 2,5 years ago), besides you pointed out in your earlier post that you discussed it anyway, we all remembered it, so, what doubt are you speaking of?
Since by your own comment you obviously don't understand the manner of the doubt I was referring to, if I tried to explain it to you you'd no doubt not get it the second time either, so...
by DethstruXioN » The maturity youre speaking of, well, the Big Balls might be childrish, David Childrish, but theyre jokes, maybe theyre not on par with your wit and intellect, or taste... does this mean youre patrolling the boards of The Three Stooges, Ace Ventura etc, to complain about the maturity level of jokes made in the movie and board? I hope not.
The Big Balls were more a reason to assume that the " 'Reading' AA Debunked" line was a joke, plus the "reading" part made it more obvious, since we all know it as the 3 hour documentary on YT, same counts for the big balls, it was a video, you cant read those, so obviously it was a joke, maybe childish, but you decided to give your opinion about it, so thats on you.
You know, I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt about this too, but if you're going to try to twist my comments to suit your own agenda, then that benefit is now null and void. I did not give my opinion on the video, I gave an opinion of Mayas USE of the video. Hopefully, that distinction won't have to be explained to you further either.
by DethstruXioN » You say "this conversation" in your first response, does that mean that this is an ongoing discussion (the same one of last year?), splintered off into a new thread?
Or do you drag your baggage to new threads, in hope for continuation, so that you dont feel obliged to go in depth.
(if not, then i dont see why this thread should connect to previous conversations, calling it "this conversation")
Oh brother. My comment was obviously in reference to my first comment in this thread. By my count, that's three things that you needed explained to you further from only ONE of my posts.
by DethstruXioN » Dont you ever get the feeling of Deja Vu?
After all these years youre still here doing the same thing, you do realize that the IMDb community doesnt account for all the AA watchers/fans right?
Do you also go around doing this (this being, jumping on every sentence of someone debunking AA) on Twitter, Facebook or wherever people talk about it in a way that does not please you?
Yes, as a matter of fact I do get the feeling of Deja Vu, but only because you trolls have continuously regurgitated the same trolling nonsense after all these years because you can't seem to come up with any new ways to try to discredit what this show suggests.
by DethstruXioN » Wherever there are opinions, there will be opposing opinions, if you keep trying to refute or reach middle ground with everyone, youll die trying.
How much longer will you be doing this, have you found a protege yet?
Why do you care? What's the matter, are you getting worried that my exposing your trolling comments (to call them "opinions" at this point would be giving them too much of that benefit of the doubt referenced earlier) for what they/you really are on a continuing basis is going to influence public opinion of you in a manner you would not prefer? share
Ouch man, youre getting rusty.
Lets get back to the point of relevance and reference.
As you could have seen, my first post was about: "Have you read AA Debunked?".
Instead of laughing it off, you blew it up and took it seriously and that just looked funny, therefore maintaining the jester status.
It might have worked if you picked a better bow to fire your arrow with, i mean, asking if Maya remembers the AA discussion, when clearly Maya referred to it already by bringing it up in the first place, was poor judgement on your behalf.
Then trying to cling on to the "doubt" you have created for yourself, that is almost absurd. You recycled too many parts and you fired recklessly, causing your attempt at a burn to fizzle.
Besides, if the first post about the balls was a joke, then why would the similar line about Reading AA Debunked, not also be a joke? seems like simple 1+1.
It couldnt hardly be a genuine question, could it, or mistake as you like to call it.
I can hear you think "what makes you so certain that it is a joke", ok fine, lets assume that it was not a joke, taking your own words as viewpoints, then;
1. Maya forgot all about "you and I have already discussed the AA Debunked video at length.", which to me is funny, being insignificant enough to be forgotten, especially with your track record.
2. Or, that Maya is in fact a troll, why do you spend so much time on a troll, being the first to respond, being the first to blow the whistle, being the main feeder, nice going, thats funny.
3. Or, that Maya is in fact a playground school kid, why the hell would you be arguing with a kid, thats very funny.
Also, what if it WAS a joke, your response was really weak, maybe you were not aware of that, because if in fact Maya did act like there was no recollection, then it WAS a joke and a funny one at that, because it certainly worked you up, you cant use that back on Maya, that just doesnt make sense, its lazy and ironically also childish, it wasnt even stooping down because your comeback was a fizzle, making it even worse, especially if you consider if it WASNT a joke, because then point 1,2 & 3 could maybe all apply at once, thus eventually making you a person that argues with a kid, or a moron or a troll, or a moronic troll kid.. well, tell me how that is not funny.
Anyway, i could make up many more ways to laugh at it, it doesnt ever matter if it in fact was a joke or not, because its funny either way, youre the one thats being all serious about it, which in turn only makes it funnier, so i think you get the point of how one can joke about this.
And thats not even trolling, im basically explaining what is going on, but you sure like to lump me together with all the trolls and whoever you think is trolling you.
This was the only point worth bringing up again, since it was the start of my posts here and will be my last, you put up some nice traps but none of them are relevant.
You call me a troll, well whatever, if that makes you feel any better, i think it is a pitiful way to justify your attitude to yourself and to others.
by DethstruXioN » Ouch man, youre getting rusty.
Lets get back to the point of relevance and reference.
As you could have seen, my first post was about: "Have you read AA Debunked?".
Instead of laughing it off, you blew it up and took it seriously and that just looked funny, therefore maintaining the jester status.
It might have worked if you picked a better bow to fire your arrow with, i mean, asking if Maya remembers the AA discussion, when clearly Maya referred to it already by bringing it up in the first place, was poor judgement on your behalf.
Then trying to cling on to the "doubt" you have created for yourself, that is almost absurd. You recycled too many parts and you fired recklessly, causing your attempt at a burn to fizzle.
Besides, if the first post about the balls was a joke, then why would the similar line about Reading AA Debunked, not also be a joke? seems like simple 1+1.
It couldnt hardly be a genuine question, could it, or mistake as you like to call it.
I can hear you think "what makes you so certain that it is a joke", ok fine, lets assume that it was not a joke, taking your own words as viewpoints, then;
1. Maya forgot all about "you and I have already discussed the AA Debunked video at length.", which to me is funny, being insignificant enough to be forgotten, especially with your track record.
2. Or, that Maya is in fact a troll, why do you spend so much time on a troll, being the first to respond, being the first to blow the whistle, being the main feeder, nice going, thats funny.
3. Or, that Maya is in fact a playground school kid, why the hell would you be arguing with a kid, thats very funny.
Also, what if it WAS a joke, your response was really weak, maybe you were not aware of that, because if in fact Maya did act like there was no recollection, then it WAS a joke and a funny one at that, because it certainly worked you up, you cant use that back on Maya, that just doesnt make sense, its lazy and ironically also childish, it wasnt even stooping down because your comeback was a fizzle, making it even worse, especially if you consider if it WASNT a joke, because then point 1,2 & 3 could maybe all apply at once, thus eventually making you a person that argues with a kid, or a moron or a troll, or a moronic troll kid.. well, tell me how that is not funny.
Anyway, i could make up many more ways to laugh at it, it doesnt ever matter if it in fact was a joke or not, because its funny either way, youre the one thats being all serious about it, which in turn only makes it funnier, so i think you get the point of how one can joke about this.
And thats not even trolling, im basically explaining what is going on, but you sure like to lump me together with all the trolls and whoever you think is trolling you.
This was the only point worth bringing up again, since it was the start of my posts here and will be my last, you put up some nice traps but none of them are relevant.
You call me a troll, well whatever, if that makes you feel any better, i think it is a pitiful way to justify your attitude to yourself and to others.
You know, all of your comments trying once again to turn me into the joke here may have really held some weight...
....if they hadn't been coming from someone who obviously has nothing better to do on a Saturday night than argue this stuff.
If simply trying so hard on this message board by posting the juvenile-based attempts to discredit wasn't enough....as you trolls always do....you THEN start doing it on your weekend nights too when everyone else is out actually enjoying life?
And you'd STILL try to convince people I'M the joke here?
Now that is funny. share
Ah right, as if posting this once on a Saturday means that i do this every time, wasting away my precious Saturday nights, besides you are the one that spends the most time on here of the two of us, so if you really wanna go there, start looking at yourself first.
Also, your posting history clearly shows that youre no stranger of arguments in the night, does it being a Saturday really hold so much value to you?
So, your attack might have hold some weight, if it wasnt for your ironic track record.
But i do agree, i am a fool for talking to you, i shall laugh it off.
Come on, laugh with me, you can do it.
by DethstruXioN » Ah right, as if posting this once on a Saturday means that i do this every time, wasting away my precious Saturday nights, besides you are the one that spends the most time on here of the two of us, so if you really wanna go there, start looking at yourself first.
Also, your posting history clearly shows that youre no stranger of arguments in the night, does it being a Saturday really hold so much value to you?
So, your attack might have hold some weight, if it wasnt for your ironic track record.
But i do agree, i am a fool for talking to you, i shall laugh it off.
Come on, laugh with me, you can do it.
None of which refuted the fact that you apparently have nothing else better to do on a Saturday night than argue this stuff.
Nice attempt to deflect the attention away from yourself though. share
WTT:
I just drop by now and then to sample the waters. I did not read your threads as I had you on ignore, Fermi.
"A stitch in time, saves your embarrassment." (RIP Ms. Penny LoBello)
by Maya55555 » WTT:
I just drop by now and then to sample the waters. I did not read your threads as I had you on ignore, Fermi.
Still sticking with that story eh...even though you rarely seem to read one of my responses without responding?
You just keep telling yourself that.
share
WTT:
You are 35 paragraphs of spit and bile, as I scan them here and there.
You still refused to answer MY QUESTION that I put to you a few YEARS back so.............
Why should I respect you?
"A stitch in time, saves your embarrassment." (RIP Ms. Penny LoBello)
by Maya55555 » WTT:
You are 35 paragraphs of spit and bile, as I scan them here and there.
You still refused to answer MY QUESTION that I put to you a few YEARS back so.............
Why should I respect you?
Still labeling people yourself I see.
Once you get around to answering the questions I asked you first even MORE years back...which you've continually tried to deflect attention away from with the questions you asked afterwards....THEN we'll talk.
Until then...<Soup Nazi voice> No respect for you! </Soup Nazi voice> share