Dumb! Debunked, and full of lies
This show is so stupid. Everyone needs to read Jason Colavito's blog and reviews of the shows outright lies, fantasy's and deceit. Also watch Ancient Aliens debunked for more on how stupid this show is
shareThis show is so stupid. Everyone needs to read Jason Colavito's blog and reviews of the shows outright lies, fantasy's and deceit. Also watch Ancient Aliens debunked for more on how stupid this show is
shareThis show is so stupid.
Everyone needs to read Jason Colavito's blog and reviews of the shows outright lies, fantasy's and deceit.
Also watch Ancient Aliens debunked for more on how stupid this show is
Danny Dier called, he wants his brain cell back
I'm Brian and so is my wife!
Danny Dier called, he wants his brain cell back
Mankind living in caves and munching on bananas...
Bananas are an exotic fruit, are you talking about Asia?
In that case, they did not live in caves around the time when the Pyramids were built.
Maybe you are talking about the people in Europe.
Even then, they were able to construct Stonehenge.
He clearly stated that's what "Mainstream historians and archaeologists" have suggested.
Ask them.
Thank You.
I said that right before the statement he quoted.
I guess too many people don't know how to read properly, or refuse to see what is right in front of them...
Look, All I am trying to say here is this...
Religions state that Man was created by God at a certain date... AND...
Mainstream historians and archaeologists claim that Modern Man didn't show up until a certain date.
Now we are finding the megalithic structures all over the world that PREDATES those dates.
SOMEONE... had to build them.
That means that either... Religions, and/or Mainstream historians and archaeologists are WRONG...
OR...
Time Travelers and/or Aliens had to build them.
If anyone has a fifth THEORY, please share!
If you don't believe that Aliens did it... FINE... But, at least turn this constant arguing, with insults and hatred... into a debate, by telling us your opinions on who made these things...
I already have. I said it was a HUMAN civilization that developed knowledge and technology who was "destroyed" and all evidence of them was lost in time, or is buried under Volcanic Rock, Desert Sand, Glaciers, or Oceans...
"Put A Little Love In Your Heart, and then Make Your Own Kind Of Music, on the road to Shambala!"
Well ok, my bad.
I just find some of your posts very aversive to read, i guess i should try harder when i want to respond.
Because we did meet common ground before, i just thought you were shouty and sorta flying off the handle, but i misinterpreted that, which caused me to skim the comment.
But yeah, i also think the historic structures would be attributed to ancient human civilizations, and i do not care if mainstream scientists or archeologists are wrong now, theyll figure it out at some point.
And as much as i like Science-Fiction, i just dont believe that the Ancient Alien theory is very credible. I do like comparing it to religion, but to say that those stories are based on facts, meh, it just doesnt add up.
But i dont exclude the possibility, as with religion, nobody knows THE answer, but i dont particularly like what they did with the ideas so far, which causes me to be very reserved with my convictions, but still to have strong opinions, to hopefully find a satisfactory answer.
Oh, my mistake. There is no longer a brain cell to give back.
I'm Brian and so is my wife!
Ive stopped here:
You obviously DON'T understand what THEORY means.
...and obviously you don't either and you don't understand what hard facts means as well.
Let me explain it to you...
Theory is used on things that have nor yet being explained... and not when something its already exploited, explained and proved beyond any shadow of doubt.
They have not the tiniest indication (let alone evidence) for the BS that they say and on the contrary we have mountains of evidence on how things really happened.
So if an idiot comes up tomorrow with a theory that the sun is cold, we should accept it as "just a theory"?
No, he is an idiot because his theory doesn't makes sense nor ever will
like the idiotic theories of the idiotic people in this show.
What they say in this show is 100% BS that they have pulled out of their irrational, paranoid, delusional and idiotic bottoms, period.
Get over it.
I have a theory that some of the people that post here (for the sake of argument we'll call them trolls) only post here to try to get a rise out of anyone who posts saying that they're open to the possibility that AA theory can't logically and/or rationally be totally dismissed.
That theory is based on the fact that there are many people who's bravery is based solely on them being part of a majority. Period.
Those trolls can be identified by the fact that they invariably resort to calling anyone who disagrees with the majority opinion delusional, irrational, etc...because you know...a majority has never been proven wrong. [cough]The Nazis[cough]
Oh... right... Your argument makes no sense. You're talking in circles!Yes it does but apparently you are incapable to understand it, even tho that is extremely simple.
So, What has been proved as FACT in this show? According to the history books, Humans didn't buildYeah ok sure what ever you pulled that out of thin air and like this show you have absolutely NOTHING to back up this.
Let me explain it to you...
Theory is used on things that have not yet being explained... and not when something its already exploited, explained and proved beyond any shadow of doubt
Oh... right... Your argument makes no sense. You're talking in circles!
Yes it does but apparently you are incapable to understand it, even tho that is extremely simple
whatever you pulled that out of thin air and like this show you have absolutely NOTHING to back up this.
especially after starting with nonsense like that
if you expect anyone or me to read that long post
Ok now I've stopped here...
No one has PROVEN that the Bible and History Books are WRONG
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about, you have complete and utter ignorance.
It's a fact beyond any doubt that the bible is wrong/false in every-single-thing, and we know again beyond any doubt that it' s a work of fiction
No one has proven history books wrong?
Obviously that's the reason why you believe this BS show and the wackos that present it
Stop making long post i dont even bother reading them cause from the get-go you are saying completely irrational things... like
Prove to me that there was no Cain. There was no Abel. and Cain did not kill his brother Abel... No one has proven this story false.
This is the most, the utter, the supreme idiotic argument ever made.
The person that makes the claims must and have to present the proofs, not the other way around... and that's also how the COURTS OF LAW work!
Do you have any evidence or even indications to back up your claims? any valid arguments? No? No? Go home then and when you do we can talk again.
people that use this utter idiotic argument aren't worthy discussing and by using that argument alone PROVES that you do NOT understand science, data, evidence, proofs, indications, research AT ALL!
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about, You have complete ignorance and that's why the BS that these idiots say in this show makes sense to you.
I am done with you.
[deleted]
Let's Try This...
Under these conditions, and "Facts".
1.) Once upon a time people thought, God created an "AGED" Earth around 5000 BC... But nobody believes that anymore. Why? Because the archaeological and geological evidence shows the Earth is at least 4.5 billion years old.
SO, It can't be GOD... and YOU don't believe in GOD or religions in anyway.
2.) Mainstream Historians and History Books currently state that mankind was not capable of building Megalithic Structures, 10000 Years ago. This belief has not been proven to be FALSE, because... There is no evidence or documentation to show that mankind was ever at those locations at that time, and there is no evidence or documentation to show that Mankind had the brainpower and the knowledge to be capable of building them.
So, for now, It must be true, that Mankind did not build them.
The show, Ancient Aliens, agrees with those "facts". And now asks you to take this test...
Who Built The 10000 Year Old Megalithic Structures?
A.) God.
B.) Mankind.
C.) Aliens.
D.) Something Else. Please Specify:
When I take the test, here is what I believe...
I think someday, the History Books will be proven WRONG, and Mankind will be a legitimate answer. But... Since I am being told by society right now that it can't be... And since I can't think of what else it could be for answer (D)...
I guess, the only answer that I can pick at this time... would be C.)
That is what the show "Ancient Aliens" is saying is the correct answer. That is not BS, it just makes perfect sense.
However, there is NO proof that Aliens did in fact built them, because there are no Alien Corpses, or Spaceships, or Alien Tech that has been "found" that proves it to be true. It has not be proven to be false either. So, For now, it is just a THEORY. Strongly believed in by many people because, they believe that there is no other answer out there...
Is C.) the answer you picked?
IF you picked A.) or B.)... How can you? You should know that is a wrong answer. Everyone believes it is wrong. If it isn't, you better enlighten the WORLD quick... Show us your proof or evidence, so we can squash the Alien Theory into dust.
If you picked D.) Please tell me your Theory. I really want to know, because no other theories are being presented by anyone... It's time to add another one to the mix.
So Einstein was an idiot too, omg, i didnt know that, he just came up with that his theory of relativity, OMG
also for u then in this line of thoughts every scientist is an idiot, cause if they come up with like cold fusion, omg hes and idiot, it cant exist, cant be done
what ure saying is the biggest BS
cause if ure not trying to invent things, we would be living in caves and searching for berries in woods, hunting with stone age weapons.
And the only written language we would know would be wall painting.
Theres always something somebodys inventing for the first time and ppl like you would always call that BS, cause they cant comprehend the fact its working.
Ure life must be hell, cause well everywhere u look at, u must be in disbelief.
Clearly you are extremely stupid... Cause
A: Clearly you do not know how to read, cause if you could you wouldnt say this utters BS to me.
B: You legendary idiot, einstein and every scientist do NOT make theories upon things that we already know, or know how they work, or we have fully exploited.... and most importantly they make theories that are based or REASON not in BS, delusions and insanity.
For example,
A combustion engine runs cause of the combustion of a fuel... now if someone comes up with a theory that a combustion engine works cause elfs are running inside it, plain and simple he is dumb fking nutcase.
Thats exactly what the idiots in this show are doing, but obviously you are too fking stupid to even understand that simple thing.
Ure life must be hell, cause well everywhere u look at, u must be in disbelief.
Many people won't accept that there are many megalithic structure on this planet that predate mainstream historical beliefs, and yet... There are there for YOU to go and see for YOURSELF! If people won't believe in that, that they won't believe in a group of people which historical records don't acknowledge.
I bet this Jason Colavito hasn't left his parents basement to see these megalithic structures... So again, Why should I believe him?
---
Agreed, and maybe I got zapped in 1970 when I took a nap propped up against one of Kubrick's monoliths at Stonehenge, BUT one can't DO that anymore as it has been fenced off to all except Obama who was able to get Stonehenge "off my bucket list" as he said.
The MAIN potential advantage of AA to Americans is to make them THINK, which is an activity that threatens dem Eyes Wide Shut and takes them out of their comfort zone [as Night shows in his Village as well as Signs and The Happening].
So AA explores the exact same issues that Kubrick CONFIRMS were the matters of 2001 ASO, 'cept one is a doco and one is a "thinkpiece dressed up as a Yippee".
Americans are Carefully Taught [South Pacific 1959] to "take sides" on all issues so are totally out of their "Village" [espec since 9/11] if asked to watch, weigh up and make their OWN conclusions on issues, or as Brian said in Life of Brian "you have to work it out for yourselves".
The irony here is that IF you do that for the ape sequence in ASO - ie actually WATCH what Kubrick is saying then you will find that MoonWatcher worked out the exact day for the solar eclipse AND was way smarter than the "space bunnies" to follow.
The further irony is that was probably too hard for Georgie et al from AA to figure, for as good as AA is, it is just a bit too "Hollywood".
http://www.kindleflippages.com/ablog/
Ancient Aliens questions the origins of modern day Christianity. The guy who made Ancient Aliens Debunked (Chris White) classifies himself as a Christian, and a Conservative Christian at that.
So White wasn't without his own motivation for coming up with a theory about AA in an effort to validate his personal religious belief, as Covalito somewhat conveniently only revealed near the end of his review of AAD.
Yesterday filmmaker Chris White released his new, three-hour documentary Ancient Aliens Debunked, which will be of interest to my readers since it is an exceptionally thorough examination of the specious claims made on the History/H2 series Ancient Aliens in the light of actual facts. The documentary goes through such claims as "impossible" megalithic architecture, "alien" images in art, and "extraterrestrials" in ancient texts and demolishes each with surgical precision. It doesn't hurt that the movie quotes me extensively at various points.
First, a bit of disclosure: Chris White asked me to participate in the documentary back in the spring, but our schedules did not mesh when he was filming. Despite the extensive use of my material in the sections on Arthur Posnansky, ancient atom bombs, and vimana aircraft, I was not involved in the production in any way and have not received any compensation from it. I did not see the film until its release yesterday.
....From a film perspective, a bit of background on the filmmaker--who narrates in the first person--would have been helpful. It isn't clear until near the end that he has something of a dog in this fight. White is a Christian (which I know because he told me so), and he has a Biblical perspective that leads him to propose, for example, that the flood of Noah really happened and that global myths are connected through one exceedingly ancient source (a la the Tower of Babel). This doesn't significantly impact the good work he does in his film (it's a very minor part of the story), but it would have been helpful to know two hours or so earlier. --- Jason Covalito
The only problem with Ancient Aliens Debunked is 3/4ths of the way through the guy goes off on a tangent about Bible accuracy and states how unquestionable it is, and ruins the whole documentary by doing EXACTLY what he accuses AA of doing.
Worst case of pot calling the kettle black ever in the history of mankind
I give a thumbs up to Jason Colavito. He does a great job debunking the AA claim. While I'm open to the possibility of alien visitation, I think the evidence for ancient astronauts in my opinion, is not too convincing.
Go, Miami Redhawks!!!
by lisasboyfriend » I give a thumbs up to Jason Colavito. He does a great job debunking the AA claim. While I'm open to the possibility of alien visitation, I think the evidence for ancient astronauts in my opinion, is not too convincing.
Apparently you missed the part...again...earlier in this thread though where it's established that his great job of debunking wasn't in actuality so great/convincing.
It was THREE posts up from YOUR OWN post. Granted that's a LONG way away, so it's understandable how you could have missed it too.
It was THREE posts up from YOUR OWN post. Granted that's a LONG way away, so it's understandable how you could have missed it too.So.. I'm counting back three here. Apparently you consider this post:
The only problem with Ancient Aliens Debunked is 3/4ths of the way through the guy goes off on a tangent about Bible accuracy and states how unquestionable it is, and ruins the whole documentary by doing EXACTLY what he accuses AA of doing.to have "established that his great job of debunking wasn't in actuality so great/convincing"? You'll have to forgive me for missing it because it doesn't, in any way, negate the facts the creator presents which obviously demonstrate that these Ancient Aliens charlatans have no idea what they're talking about. share
Worst case of pot calling the kettle black ever in the history of mankind
You'll have to forgive me then too if you think at this point I'm actually going to give you the benefit of the doubt that you're approaching this subject objectively given our past exchanges on this message board.
While your memory is apparently that bad...mine isnt.
Objectively speaking, do the ancient alien theorists featured on this show frequently present as fact claims that are untrue?
shareObjectively speaking, why are you trying to change the subject from the fact that Ancient Aliens Debunked was made/produced by a person (Chris White) with a subjective personal motivation (his own religious beliefs) for trying to debunk AA theory?
share1) It's strange that you won't answer such a simple question.
2) Facts are facts, regardless of the motivations of the people who present them. The AA theorists make their living off duping people into believing them, so let's not leave them out of this whole "objectivity" discussion. Why are their (unsourced) facts good and Chris White's (properly cited) facts bad?
by troodon311 »
1) It's strange that you won't answer such a simple question.
2) Facts are facts, regardless of the motivations of the people who present them. The AA theorists make their living off duping people into believing them, so let's not leave them out of this whole "objectivity" discussion. Why are their (unsourced) facts good and Chris White's (properly cited) facts bad?
As I said, we've had this discussion here before.So we'll make that two questions, then, that you refuse to answer. share
Strange that you still seem to be trying to claim objectivity by claiming that your opinions about AA are facts.
As I said, we've had this discussion here before.
by troodon311 >>So we'll make that two questions, then, that you refuse to answer.
Pot, meet kettle.I guess you don't understand what this phrase means.
being the troll that you are after all.Apparently you just don't know what a 'troll' is either. Not every human being who articulates disagreement with you, and tries to show you deficiencies in your thinking, is a troll.
As I said, we've had this discussion before, where you deny you're a troll even though all you ever do while you're here is talk trash about the show the message board you're doing it on is for.
So, troll.
Your other points of contention are based on your own obvious personal opinion, and since you've ALREADY tried to pass off your opinions as facts with your "answers"...while simultaneously implying my responses should be dismissed since I don't agree with your opinions.
pot/kettle
But then I've explained that to you in the past too...and yet here you are again doing the same thing...proving it's you who still doesn't understand that your opinions aren't as conclusive as you like to think they are.
So, done.