MovieChat Forums > Titanic II (2010) Discussion > It wasn't THAT Bad...

It wasn't THAT Bad...

posted 14 years ago by Slyth66
23 replies | jump to latest

Seriously, people need to stop comparing it to the James Cameron film (my favorite movie of all time). Asylum is known for what they do, remaking films on a low budget. And even though I've only seen one other film by them, this definitely seems to blow the rest out of the water. Aside from the visual effects, almost everything else in this film was solid. The acting, storyline, and characters. The only thing I hated about this movie was the ending. I feel it was rushed and not enough detail was put into the final moments of the ships and characters. But aside from that, this film at least deserves 3.5-4/10 stars.

[–] Kling 10 years ago

I totally agree with you. This by no means a good movie, but looking at the vast number of really bad movies, this is far from the bottom layer. Acting was better than expected. I'd give it 3/10 and think it deserves much better than the current 1.6/10. I think most of the very low scores are due to expectations, wathcing this and expecting a true sequel to Titanic would be disappointing to say the least.

[–] Stratego (31083) 2 years ago

This movie was awful. Bad CGI, bad script, bad editing, bad sound mixing, bad everything! It was almost at the same level as Birdemic.

[–] david80848688 (331) a year ago

It was fucking boring. Titanic 666 (the sequel to this?) was slightly better.