that the father of one of the murdered kids (the one that confronted Rachel at the firm) is the actual murderer?
Just feels that way, because if Leonard isn't guilty, then that means the real murderer is still out there, and it would seem weird to leave that hanging.
Unless of course it turns out that Leonard is infact guilty, but I don't see it going that way.
Yes. I think the girl's father killed her and the boyfriend.
Dr Jason Bull: Don't give up on people, they're all we've got.
Yes, it crossed my mind that the father might be the killer. But at the same time, I kept thinking that Leonard killed the kids since everyone was sure he did it.
"The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources." ~Albert Einstein
What I don't get is that they found Leonard at the scene covered in blood, standing over their bodies...
Did they ever mention how the couple was killed?
Since they found him standing over the bodies, the killer would've had to have left the weapon at the scene for them to believe he did it, right? Did they wipe their prints off before they left it? Did Leonard stupidly pick it up in a drug-induced stupor and get his prints on it? Were both the killer and Leonard wearing gloves so no prints on the weapon fit? Or was there no weapon and the police were just like "Well, the guy is still here, but he got rid of the weapon somewhere before he came back" which makes no sense.
Never Ever Help anyone lying in blood. Whistle a happy tune and walk on. If they cant find who did the deed they sure as can if something goes wrong get at you. If you also happen to be a TRAINED MEDIC even worse.
Well some might be that horrid and you betcha they do not call lawyers ambulance chasers for nothing.
For starters he IS BLACK he IS HIGH on drugs. Case closed. How about taking this case to MAJOR CRIMES or cold cases. Sorry Major Crimes is L.A.