For anyone who read the books...
Is this movie accurate on anything, like was OZ that big of a jerk when he first got there, or Theodora was somewhat good before becoming evil?
shareIs this movie accurate on anything, like was OZ that big of a jerk when he first got there, or Theodora was somewhat good before becoming evil?
shareThere was no Theodora in the books. The Wicked Witch of the West was already established as evil in the first book ("The Wonderful Wizard of Oz"), and had no backstory. She wasn't even all that much of a major character. She was yellow, had one eye, wore white, and was afraid of the dark.
The Wizard had a little bit of backstory, but not much. There was nothing to imply that he was a much of a jerk as in this movie, but nothing to say that he necessarily wasn't either.
Basically, this movie takes a period in Oz history about which there is little written in the books, and tells its own story. A few things in it directly contradict things in the books (in the books, the Wizard had the Emerald City built, in the movie it was already there; Glinda and Ozma are more or less combined into one character in the movie by making Glinda the daughter of the King of Oz, etc). Other parts, like Oz being a Jerk and the Wicked Witch of the West starting out as a naive woman named Theodora don't necesarily contradict anything in the books, but there also isn't anything in the books to imply them.
Courage, men! We've not sunk before, and we'll not sink now!
Ah, thank you for your reply.
shareWhat set me askew was that this seems to take place 30 years before Dorothy's journey, say, 1910 or so, yet the Emerald City is full of skyscrapers like 1930s New York, complete with electric lights.
The 1939 movie was set in the same time period of the Oz books (around 1900) as evidenced by the Kansans turn-of-the-century style of clothing, the lack of automobiles or other machines on the farm, and Professor Marvel's horse-drawn wagon. When the 1939 movie was made, the art deco style of the Emerald City was seen as ultra modern if not futuristic. The 2013 movie seems to have borrowed some of the 1939 movie's interpretation of the Emerald City because it would look "right" to people familiar with the classic.
shareThat's why the book/play Wicked is a completely different origin story, which was another discussion on a different thread somewhere in here.
shareIt's definitely closer to the books in terms of content, but there are a couple of things looks-wise that are from the MGM film - like the Wicked Witch's skin being green, the horse of a different colour in the field, the Emerald City actually being green and Oz people having counterparts in Kansas. Not to mention the two wicked witches being sisters, which they weren't in the book. And the flying monkeys are servants of the wicked witch, whereas in the book they're neutral and only serve whoever has the golden cap. Glinda travels by bubble here, which she doesn't in the book. And from what I remember the Wicked Witch of the West doesn't fly on a broomstick in the book.
The China village was in the books, as part of a lengthy journey to visit Glinda after the Wizard leaves. The film kind of references how it'll turn out in the future - as Dorothy and friends discover that any china people who get smashed have to be mended. In this film the China Girl doesn't know about mending - so I guess it's a shout out that Oscar introduces that idea for the future.
Glinda is the witch of the South in the books like she is in this film, and the Quadlings are indeed the name of her people. The witches in this also draw their magic from special items like they do in the book - Glinda has the wand, Evanora has the emerald necklace and Theodora has the ruby ring. In the books the witches made magic items because spell casting was a pain in the ass. So that's why Evanora is powerless after her necklace is destroyed, and why Glinda would be if Oscar had broken her wand. The witch still has her knowledge though and can make another power centre - which explains why Evanora would still be in power when Dorothy drops the house on her. A small detail is that Evanora's true form is actually inspired by the book's description of the Wicked Witch of the West
Another small thing is that the poppy field is already beside the Emerald City. In the MGM film the witch enchanted the poppies to put Dorothy and friends to sleep. But in the books Oz poppies just have that effect normally.
I'm gonna die of long hair!
In many ways the Wicked Witch of the West became Dorothy's "Moriarty". That is, in the books she's mentioned twice, but in the films and other adaptations she's assumed to be the arch-nemesis (although I remember a two season animated series where the Nome King was the big bad).
I really wish we could actually see proper film versions of the other Oz books. Disney combined a couple of them in "Return to Oz" but then, nothing more. The main trouble is that with many of them is that they're "processionals". The main character (mostly Dorothy) encounters a problem, and goes on a long search for an answer, adding extra characters along the way.
Laura Ess
[deleted]