MovieChat Forums > 30 Minutes or Less (2011) Discussion > Why the low rating?

Why the low rating?

posted 13 years ago by Bourne30
9 replies | jump to latest

6.2? Nah it deserves at least a 7.

This movie was hilarious!

[–] shark90-1 13 years ago

i agree it was really hysterical. i feel it deserved a 7

[–] Harry-Caul 13 years ago

I really enjoyed this found it really funny and loved all the performances. I never pay attention to what some rating says:-)

[–] jaxi2005 13 years ago

No the rating is correct, nothing more nothing less. Not the best in the genre but it wasn't bad either, 6.2 is accurate.

[–] 13 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Bugz_moran 13 years ago

I thought that part was pretty good too.

If the movie would have been about the two idiots it probably would have been a better comedy

[–] Eric1485 13 years ago

I thought this movie was pretty fun to watch, but not very memorable.

5/10

Check out my Blog @ http://ericsblogofawesomeness.blogspot.com/

Twitter @ ericm1129

[–] clickbait 11 years ago

The rating is messed up, this crapfest of a movie shouldnt have more than 1/10 in rating...one of the worst movies ever made...wasnt even one funny part in the whole movie.

[–] 11 years ago

[deleted]

[–] userrrrr 10 years ago

I remember seeing it 4 years ago. This movie is terrible. Vile. Bad. Not funny. At all.